公司宗旨与法律

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT European Management Review Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1111/emre.12629
Anna Grandori
{"title":"公司宗旨与法律","authors":"Anna Grandori","doi":"10.1111/emre.12629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <i>European Management Review</i> is pleased to host this Dialogue on an important theme, gaining increasing attention in the academic debate on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as in the policy initiatives of European institutions. The theme is the role of “purposes” in driving the conduct of enterprises. This Dialogue develops and articulates the argument that a debate on purposes not considering the role of law is destined to remain weak in consequences and imprecise in conceptualization.</p><p>The Dialogue comprises three pieces centered, in different ways, on that role. The pieces are developments of some of the presentations offered by the authors at a EURAM 2023 Symposium, of which EMR invited submission, for potential transformation in short articles to compose a Dialogue.</p><p>The contribution by Colin Mayer offers a set of broad interdisciplinary reflections on corporate purposes, in the context of contemporary challenges, in relation to economic theory and practice, to the evolving corporate law, and to performance and policy implications.</p><p>Livia Ventura mobilizes her juridical background for offering a much needed map for orienting in the complicated territory of emerging legal provisions; especially with reference to Europe, but including many comparative law observations with respect to the United Kingdom and the United States.</p><p>The analysis by Blanche Segrestin and Kevin Levillain reflects and draw general lessons and implications from an important European experience: the French reform instituting the form of <i>société à mission</i>, that the author themselves contributed in promoting. Those implications include how those developments in the law can suggest broadening and renewing the conceptualization of the role of management.</p><p>Thanking the authors for having considered EMR as a possible outlet, we hope the Dialogue can contribute useful inputs for strengthening the discussion on purposes in management, as well as for illuminating public policy regulation, in Europe and elsewhere.</p><p>Anna Grandori</p><p>Editor-in-Chief, European Management Review</p>","PeriodicalId":47372,"journal":{"name":"European Management Review","volume":"20 4","pages":"718"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emre.12629","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate purposes and the law\",\"authors\":\"Anna Grandori\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emre.12629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The <i>European Management Review</i> is pleased to host this Dialogue on an important theme, gaining increasing attention in the academic debate on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as in the policy initiatives of European institutions. The theme is the role of “purposes” in driving the conduct of enterprises. This Dialogue develops and articulates the argument that a debate on purposes not considering the role of law is destined to remain weak in consequences and imprecise in conceptualization.</p><p>The Dialogue comprises three pieces centered, in different ways, on that role. The pieces are developments of some of the presentations offered by the authors at a EURAM 2023 Symposium, of which EMR invited submission, for potential transformation in short articles to compose a Dialogue.</p><p>The contribution by Colin Mayer offers a set of broad interdisciplinary reflections on corporate purposes, in the context of contemporary challenges, in relation to economic theory and practice, to the evolving corporate law, and to performance and policy implications.</p><p>Livia Ventura mobilizes her juridical background for offering a much needed map for orienting in the complicated territory of emerging legal provisions; especially with reference to Europe, but including many comparative law observations with respect to the United Kingdom and the United States.</p><p>The analysis by Blanche Segrestin and Kevin Levillain reflects and draw general lessons and implications from an important European experience: the French reform instituting the form of <i>société à mission</i>, that the author themselves contributed in promoting. Those implications include how those developments in the law can suggest broadening and renewing the conceptualization of the role of management.</p><p>Thanking the authors for having considered EMR as a possible outlet, we hope the Dialogue can contribute useful inputs for strengthening the discussion on purposes in management, as well as for illuminating public policy regulation, in Europe and elsewhere.</p><p>Anna Grandori</p><p>Editor-in-Chief, European Management Review</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Management Review\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emre.12629\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emre.12629\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emre.12629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《欧洲管理评论》很高兴主办这一重要主题的对话,该对话在大西洋两岸的学术辩论以及欧洲机构的政策倡议中受到越来越多的关注。主题是“目的”在推动企业行为方面的作用。本《对话》发展并阐明了这样一种观点,即不考虑法律作用的关于目的的辩论注定在后果上是软弱的,在概念化上是不精确的。《对话》由三个部分组成,以不同的方式围绕这一角色展开。这些作品是作者在EURAM 2023研讨会上提供的一些演讲的发展,其中EMR邀请提交,用于潜在的简短文章转换,以组成对话。科林·梅尔的贡献提供了一系列广泛的跨学科思考,在当代挑战的背景下,与经济理论和实践、不断发展的公司法以及绩效和政策影响有关。Livia Ventura利用她的法律背景为在新兴法律条款的复杂领域中定位提供了急需的地图;特别是关于欧洲,但也包括许多关于英国和美国的比较法观察。Blanche Segrestin和Kevin Levillain的分析反映了并从一个重要的欧洲经验中得出了一般的教训和启示:法国改革建立了社会转型使命的形式,作者自己也参与了推动。这些影响包括法律的这些发展如何建议扩大和更新管理作用的概念。感谢作者将EMR作为一种可能的出路,我们希望对话能够为加强对管理目的的讨论以及为欧洲和其他地方的公共政策监管提供有益的投入。《欧洲管理评论》主编
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate purposes and the law

The European Management Review is pleased to host this Dialogue on an important theme, gaining increasing attention in the academic debate on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as in the policy initiatives of European institutions. The theme is the role of “purposes” in driving the conduct of enterprises. This Dialogue develops and articulates the argument that a debate on purposes not considering the role of law is destined to remain weak in consequences and imprecise in conceptualization.

The Dialogue comprises three pieces centered, in different ways, on that role. The pieces are developments of some of the presentations offered by the authors at a EURAM 2023 Symposium, of which EMR invited submission, for potential transformation in short articles to compose a Dialogue.

The contribution by Colin Mayer offers a set of broad interdisciplinary reflections on corporate purposes, in the context of contemporary challenges, in relation to economic theory and practice, to the evolving corporate law, and to performance and policy implications.

Livia Ventura mobilizes her juridical background for offering a much needed map for orienting in the complicated territory of emerging legal provisions; especially with reference to Europe, but including many comparative law observations with respect to the United Kingdom and the United States.

The analysis by Blanche Segrestin and Kevin Levillain reflects and draw general lessons and implications from an important European experience: the French reform instituting the form of société à mission, that the author themselves contributed in promoting. Those implications include how those developments in the law can suggest broadening and renewing the conceptualization of the role of management.

Thanking the authors for having considered EMR as a possible outlet, we hope the Dialogue can contribute useful inputs for strengthening the discussion on purposes in management, as well as for illuminating public policy regulation, in Europe and elsewhere.

Anna Grandori

Editor-in-Chief, European Management Review

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Management Review is an international journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of management in private and public sector organizations through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis. The European Management Review provides an international forum for dialogue between researchers, thereby improving the understanding of the nature of management in different settings and promoting the transfer of research results to management practice. Although one of the European Management Review"s aims is to foster the general advancement of management scholarship among European scholars and/or those academics interested in European management issues.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The theory of the MNE@64: Building on Hymer's legacy Hymer and the theory of the MNE: A commentary by John Cantwell Hymer and the theory of the MNE: A commentary by Niels Noorderhaven Buying knowledge-intensive business services: Overarching themes, actor relationships, and future research agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1