经济危机、创新和组织反应:来自巴西的证据

Paulo Feitosa, Renato Garcia
{"title":"经济危机、创新和组织反应:来自巴西的证据","authors":"Paulo Feitosa, Renato Garcia","doi":"10.1108/jeee-05-2022-0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The economic crisis of 2008 resulted in a unique context for the empirical experimentation of organizational learning and entrepreneurship theories from Schumpeterian inspiration. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the economic downturns change the limits and possibilities to pursue both exploration and exploitation and thus achieve innovative performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study examines an original database with the patent portfolio of 2,309 firms based in Brazil, covering a period of eight years preceding the 2008 economic crisis, that is 2000–2007, and five years thereafter, 2008–2013. To test the hypotheses empirically, the authors use the negative binomial model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings add to the literature in two ways. First, this study found a positive association between exploitation and exploration behaviour and innovative performance. However, this relation is curvilinear because there are diminishing negative effects on innovation. Second, regarding the distinction between creative destruction and creative accumulation, the results support the prevalence of creative accumulation, although consistent with the notion of co-occurrence of both models.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study expands the discussion on how entrepreneurs respond to the economic crisis in specific contexts of an emerging economy. We provide new empirical evidence through the exploration of a unique data set on the patent portfolio of 2,309 firms based in Brazil. Most of the previous literature has applied this topic to developed countries, and there are few studies that apply this topic outside the focus of US and European countries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies","volume":"345 6‐7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic crisis, innovation and organizational responses: evidence from Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Feitosa, Renato Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jeee-05-2022-0145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The economic crisis of 2008 resulted in a unique context for the empirical experimentation of organizational learning and entrepreneurship theories from Schumpeterian inspiration. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the economic downturns change the limits and possibilities to pursue both exploration and exploitation and thus achieve innovative performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study examines an original database with the patent portfolio of 2,309 firms based in Brazil, covering a period of eight years preceding the 2008 economic crisis, that is 2000–2007, and five years thereafter, 2008–2013. To test the hypotheses empirically, the authors use the negative binomial model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings add to the literature in two ways. First, this study found a positive association between exploitation and exploration behaviour and innovative performance. However, this relation is curvilinear because there are diminishing negative effects on innovation. Second, regarding the distinction between creative destruction and creative accumulation, the results support the prevalence of creative accumulation, although consistent with the notion of co-occurrence of both models.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study expands the discussion on how entrepreneurs respond to the economic crisis in specific contexts of an emerging economy. We provide new empirical evidence through the exploration of a unique data set on the patent portfolio of 2,309 firms based in Brazil. Most of the previous literature has applied this topic to developed countries, and there are few studies that apply this topic outside the focus of US and European countries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":45682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies\",\"volume\":\"345 6‐7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-05-2022-0145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-05-2022-0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2008年的经济危机为熊彼特启发下的组织学习和创业理论的实证实验提供了一个独特的背景。本文的目的是研究经济衰退如何改变追求勘探和开发的限制和可能性,从而实现创新绩效。本研究考察了巴西2309家公司专利组合的原始数据库,涵盖了2008年经济危机之前的8年(2000-2007年)和之后的5年(2008 - 2013年)。为了从经验上检验这些假设,作者使用了负二项模型。这些发现从两个方面补充了文献。首先,本研究发现了开发和勘探行为与创新绩效之间的正相关关系。然而,这种关系是曲线的,因为对创新的负面影响越来越小。其次,关于创造性破坏和创造性积累之间的区别,研究结果支持创造性积累的普遍性,尽管这与两种模型共存的概念是一致的。原创性/价值本研究扩展了在新兴经济体的特定背景下企业家如何应对经济危机的讨论。我们通过探索巴西2309家公司专利组合的独特数据集,提供了新的经验证据。以往的文献大多将这一主题应用于发达国家,很少有研究将这一主题应用于美国和欧洲以外的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic crisis, innovation and organizational responses: evidence from Brazil

Purpose

The economic crisis of 2008 resulted in a unique context for the empirical experimentation of organizational learning and entrepreneurship theories from Schumpeterian inspiration. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the economic downturns change the limits and possibilities to pursue both exploration and exploitation and thus achieve innovative performance.

Design/methodology/approach

This study examines an original database with the patent portfolio of 2,309 firms based in Brazil, covering a period of eight years preceding the 2008 economic crisis, that is 2000–2007, and five years thereafter, 2008–2013. To test the hypotheses empirically, the authors use the negative binomial model.

Findings

The findings add to the literature in two ways. First, this study found a positive association between exploitation and exploration behaviour and innovative performance. However, this relation is curvilinear because there are diminishing negative effects on innovation. Second, regarding the distinction between creative destruction and creative accumulation, the results support the prevalence of creative accumulation, although consistent with the notion of co-occurrence of both models.

Originality/value

This study expands the discussion on how entrepreneurs respond to the economic crisis in specific contexts of an emerging economy. We provide new empirical evidence through the exploration of a unique data set on the patent portfolio of 2,309 firms based in Brazil. Most of the previous literature has applied this topic to developed countries, and there are few studies that apply this topic outside the focus of US and European countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: JEEE acquaints the readers with the latest trends and directions of explorations in the theory and practice of entrepreneurship. For the research section, the Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies considers high quality theoretical and empirical academic research articles in the field of entrepreneurship, as well as general reviews. The ‘Entrepreneurship in practice’ section publishes insights from industry, case studies, policy focus pieces and interviews with entrepreneurs. Coverage will focus primarily on the following topics: Government policy on entrepreneurship International entrepreneurship Small and medium-sized enterprises Family-owned businesses The innovator as an individual and as a personality type New venture creation and acquisitions of a growing company Entrepreneurial behaviour in large organizations Venture financing and entrepreneurial education Minority issues in small business and entrepreneurship Corporate and non-profit entrepreneurship Ethics, the entrepreneur and the company Entrepreneurial cooperation and networking Entrepreneurial environment and cross-cultural management Comparative studies of entrepreneurship and marketing issues Development of the service sector and Chinese economy Chinese marketing and business innovation Service marketing and service innovation Brand management and network innovation Supply chain management and customer relationship management Entrepreneurial processes Risk management and venture capital Entrepreneurship and environmental sustainability Entrepreneurial growth and business sustainability Entrepreneurship, social sustainability, and social justice Entrepreneurship, proverty alleviation, and economic development.
期刊最新文献
The impact of robotic working patterns on employee work life and job satisfaction: evidence from ethnic minority businesses in the UK Inequality and entrepreneurship: future research trends Why small business owners get demotivated? Modeling “unwillingness to grow” using ISM approach Disentangling tech-enabled system change in social enterprises: an empirical exploration of Ashoka fellows Navigating the digital landscape: communication visibility and entrepreneurial opportunity identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1