{"title":"家禽养殖中的抗菌素耐药性:从家禽养殖场生长和休养期分离的环境大肠杆菌的回顾。","authors":"Sukanya Thongratsakul, Patamabhorn Amavisit, Chaithep Poolkhet","doi":"10.1155/2023/8354235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the production cycle of poultry farms, pathogens may remain in the next cycle of rearing young chickens. This study was conducted at three industrial chicken farms (A, B, and C) in central Thailand. Results showed that the percentages of <i>E. coli</i> during the resting period in farms A, B, and C were 28.6, 53.8, and 7.8, respectively, and those during the growing period were 45, 68.8, and 75. The most common resistant patterns during the resting period in all farms were AML-AMP-SXT and AML-AMP-DO-SXT, and those during the growing period were AML-AMP and AML-AMP-SXT. The locations of <i>bla</i><sub>TEM</sub>-positive <i>E. coli</i> isolates from the inside houses (inside buildings) of all farms included cloacal swabs, floors, water nipples, pan feeders, and husks, whereas that from the outside environment included boots, wastewater, soil, and water from cooling pads and tanks. Our results indicate that the percentage of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and its pattern depend on the husbandry period and the strictness of biosecurity. Moreover, our findings derived from samples gathered from broiler farms between 2013 and 2015 align with those of the current studies, highlighting persistent trends in <i>E. coli</i> resistance to various antimicrobial agents. Therefore, enhancing biosecurity measures throughout both the resting and growing periods is crucial, with a specific focus on managing raw materials, bedding, breeding equipment, and staff hygiene to reduce the transmission of antimicrobial resistance in poultry farms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23503,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine International","volume":"2023 ","pages":"8354235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry Farming: A Look Back at Environmental <i>Escherichia coli</i> Isolated from Poultry Farms during the Growing and Resting Periods.\",\"authors\":\"Sukanya Thongratsakul, Patamabhorn Amavisit, Chaithep Poolkhet\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8354235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the production cycle of poultry farms, pathogens may remain in the next cycle of rearing young chickens. This study was conducted at three industrial chicken farms (A, B, and C) in central Thailand. Results showed that the percentages of <i>E. coli</i> during the resting period in farms A, B, and C were 28.6, 53.8, and 7.8, respectively, and those during the growing period were 45, 68.8, and 75. The most common resistant patterns during the resting period in all farms were AML-AMP-SXT and AML-AMP-DO-SXT, and those during the growing period were AML-AMP and AML-AMP-SXT. The locations of <i>bla</i><sub>TEM</sub>-positive <i>E. coli</i> isolates from the inside houses (inside buildings) of all farms included cloacal swabs, floors, water nipples, pan feeders, and husks, whereas that from the outside environment included boots, wastewater, soil, and water from cooling pads and tanks. Our results indicate that the percentage of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and its pattern depend on the husbandry period and the strictness of biosecurity. Moreover, our findings derived from samples gathered from broiler farms between 2013 and 2015 align with those of the current studies, highlighting persistent trends in <i>E. coli</i> resistance to various antimicrobial agents. Therefore, enhancing biosecurity measures throughout both the resting and growing periods is crucial, with a specific focus on managing raw materials, bedding, breeding equipment, and staff hygiene to reduce the transmission of antimicrobial resistance in poultry farms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Medicine International\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"8354235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697774/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Medicine International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8354235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8354235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在家禽养殖场的生产周期中,病原体可能会在下一个饲养雏鸡的周期中残留。本研究在泰国中部的三个工业化养鸡场(A、B和C)进行。结果表明,A、B、C养殖场静息期大肠杆菌检出率分别为28.6、53.8、7.8,生长期大肠杆菌检出率分别为45、68.8、75。各养殖场静息期最常见的抗性型为AML-AMP- sxt和AML-AMP- do - sxt,生长期最常见的抗性型为AML-AMP和AML-AMP- sxt。在所有养殖场的室内(建筑物内)分离到blatemi阳性大肠杆菌的位置包括泄殖腔拭子、地板、水乳头、平底锅喂食器和外壳,而在外部环境中分离到的位置包括靴子、废水、土壤和冷却垫和水箱的水。结果表明,不同饲养年限和生物安全措施的严格程度决定了其耐药比例和模式。此外,我们从2013年至2015年从肉鸡农场收集的样本中得出的发现与当前的研究结果一致,强调了大肠杆菌对各种抗菌剂的耐药性的持续趋势。因此,在休养期和生长期加强生物安全措施至关重要,特别注重对原材料、床上用品、养殖设备和工作人员卫生进行管理,以减少抗菌素耐药性在家禽养殖场的传播。
Antimicrobial Resistance in Poultry Farming: A Look Back at Environmental Escherichia coli Isolated from Poultry Farms during the Growing and Resting Periods.
During the production cycle of poultry farms, pathogens may remain in the next cycle of rearing young chickens. This study was conducted at three industrial chicken farms (A, B, and C) in central Thailand. Results showed that the percentages of E. coli during the resting period in farms A, B, and C were 28.6, 53.8, and 7.8, respectively, and those during the growing period were 45, 68.8, and 75. The most common resistant patterns during the resting period in all farms were AML-AMP-SXT and AML-AMP-DO-SXT, and those during the growing period were AML-AMP and AML-AMP-SXT. The locations of blaTEM-positive E. coli isolates from the inside houses (inside buildings) of all farms included cloacal swabs, floors, water nipples, pan feeders, and husks, whereas that from the outside environment included boots, wastewater, soil, and water from cooling pads and tanks. Our results indicate that the percentage of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and its pattern depend on the husbandry period and the strictness of biosecurity. Moreover, our findings derived from samples gathered from broiler farms between 2013 and 2015 align with those of the current studies, highlighting persistent trends in E. coli resistance to various antimicrobial agents. Therefore, enhancing biosecurity measures throughout both the resting and growing periods is crucial, with a specific focus on managing raw materials, bedding, breeding equipment, and staff hygiene to reduce the transmission of antimicrobial resistance in poultry farms.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles and review articles in all areas of veterinary research. The journal will consider articles on the biological basis of disease, as well as diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and epidemiology.