使用偏好评估确定自闭症青少年的偏好工作任务

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Education and Treatment of Children Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s43494-021-00061-3
St. Peter, Claire, Shuler, Natalie J., Toegel, Cory, Diaz-Salvat, Claudia, Jones, Stephanie H.
{"title":"使用偏好评估确定自闭症青少年的偏好工作任务","authors":"St. Peter, Claire, Shuler, Natalie J., Toegel, Cory, Diaz-Salvat, Claudia, Jones, Stephanie H.","doi":"10.1007/s43494-021-00061-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Matching job tasks to the individual’s preferences improves job performance. Preference assessments, including paired stimulus (PS) and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement (MSWO) procedures, can be used to identify preferred vocational tasks for individuals with disabilities. However, there are few direct comparisons of the efficacy and efficiency of these two assessments for identifying preferred job tasks. We completed the PS and MSWO assessments for three participants who had limited vocal skills and analyzed correspondence between the assessment outcomes. We then assessed the validity of each assessment by evaluating engagement in the tasks identified as high- and low-preferred. Lastly, we asked teachers to watch videos of students engaged in high- and low-preferred tasks and rate student engagement, student happiness, and whether they would recommend the task. For all participants, both preference assessments identified the same high-preferred job task, but different low-preferred tasks. All participants remained engaged when completing the high-preferred task, but two participants were less engaged with the low-preferred tasks identified by the PS than the low-preferred task identified by the MSWO. All teachers suggested that they would recommend the task that was identified as high-preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":"30 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Preference Assessments to Identify Preferred Job Tasks for Adolescents with Autism\",\"authors\":\"St. Peter, Claire, Shuler, Natalie J., Toegel, Cory, Diaz-Salvat, Claudia, Jones, Stephanie H.\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43494-021-00061-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Matching job tasks to the individual’s preferences improves job performance. Preference assessments, including paired stimulus (PS) and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement (MSWO) procedures, can be used to identify preferred vocational tasks for individuals with disabilities. However, there are few direct comparisons of the efficacy and efficiency of these two assessments for identifying preferred job tasks. We completed the PS and MSWO assessments for three participants who had limited vocal skills and analyzed correspondence between the assessment outcomes. We then assessed the validity of each assessment by evaluating engagement in the tasks identified as high- and low-preferred. Lastly, we asked teachers to watch videos of students engaged in high- and low-preferred tasks and rate student engagement, student happiness, and whether they would recommend the task. For all participants, both preference assessments identified the same high-preferred job task, but different low-preferred tasks. All participants remained engaged when completing the high-preferred task, but two participants were less engaged with the low-preferred tasks identified by the PS than the low-preferred task identified by the MSWO. All teachers suggested that they would recommend the task that was identified as high-preferred.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"volume\":\"30 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00061-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00061-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

将工作任务与个人偏好相匹配可以提高工作绩效。偏好评估,包括配对刺激(PS)和多重刺激-无替代(MSWO)程序,可用于确定残疾人偏好的职业任务。然而,很少有直接比较这两种评估的效力和效率,以确定首选的工作任务。我们完成了三个声音技能有限的参与者的PS和MSWO评估,并分析了评估结果之间的对应关系。然后,我们通过评估被确定为高偏好和低偏好的任务的参与程度来评估每个评估的有效性。最后,我们要求教师观看学生参与高偏好和低偏好任务的视频,并评估学生的参与度,学生的幸福感,以及他们是否会推荐该任务。对于所有参与者来说,两种偏好评估都确定了相同的高偏好工作任务,但不同的低偏好任务。所有参与者在完成高偏好任务时都保持专注,但两名参与者在完成低偏好任务时的专注度低于完成低偏好任务时的专注度。所有的老师都建议他们推荐被认为是高偏好的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Preference Assessments to Identify Preferred Job Tasks for Adolescents with Autism

Matching job tasks to the individual’s preferences improves job performance. Preference assessments, including paired stimulus (PS) and multiple-stimulus-without-replacement (MSWO) procedures, can be used to identify preferred vocational tasks for individuals with disabilities. However, there are few direct comparisons of the efficacy and efficiency of these two assessments for identifying preferred job tasks. We completed the PS and MSWO assessments for three participants who had limited vocal skills and analyzed correspondence between the assessment outcomes. We then assessed the validity of each assessment by evaluating engagement in the tasks identified as high- and low-preferred. Lastly, we asked teachers to watch videos of students engaged in high- and low-preferred tasks and rate student engagement, student happiness, and whether they would recommend the task. For all participants, both preference assessments identified the same high-preferred job task, but different low-preferred tasks. All participants remained engaged when completing the high-preferred task, but two participants were less engaged with the low-preferred tasks identified by the PS than the low-preferred task identified by the MSWO. All teachers suggested that they would recommend the task that was identified as high-preferred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness- and Relationship-Based Interventions: Which Break is Better for Improving Classroom Behavior? Enhancing Ci3T Professional Learning: Initial Lessons Learned from Ci3T Implementers A Systematic Review of Explicit Instruction and Frequency Building Interventions to Teach Students to Write The Daily Report Card and Check-in/Check-out: A Commentary About Two Siloed Interventions Training Behavior Analysts as Strategic Scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1