{"title":"异质信念下谨慎决策者的最优保险","authors":"Mario Ghossoub, Wenjun Jiang, Jiandong Ren","doi":"10.1007/s13385-022-00335-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper we extend some of the results in the literature on optimal insurance under heterogeneous beliefs in the presence of the no-sabotage condition, by allowing the likelihood ratio function to be non-monotone. Under the assumption of prudence and a mild smoothness condition on the likelihood ratio function, we first partition the whole domain of loss into disjoint regions and then obtain an explicit parametric form for the optimal indemnity function over each piece, by resorting to the marginal indemnity function formulation. The case where there exists belief singularity between the decision maker and the insurer is also studied. As an illustration, we consider a special case of our setting in which the premium principle is a distortion premium principle. We then obtain a closed-form characterization of the optimal indemnity for the cases where premia are determined by Value-at-Risk and Tail Value-at-Risk. Our study complements the literature and provides new insights into several similar problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":44305,"journal":{"name":"European Actuarial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal insurance for a prudent decision maker under heterogeneous beliefs\",\"authors\":\"Mario Ghossoub, Wenjun Jiang, Jiandong Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13385-022-00335-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper we extend some of the results in the literature on optimal insurance under heterogeneous beliefs in the presence of the no-sabotage condition, by allowing the likelihood ratio function to be non-monotone. Under the assumption of prudence and a mild smoothness condition on the likelihood ratio function, we first partition the whole domain of loss into disjoint regions and then obtain an explicit parametric form for the optimal indemnity function over each piece, by resorting to the marginal indemnity function formulation. The case where there exists belief singularity between the decision maker and the insurer is also studied. As an illustration, we consider a special case of our setting in which the premium principle is a distortion premium principle. We then obtain a closed-form characterization of the optimal indemnity for the cases where premia are determined by Value-at-Risk and Tail Value-at-Risk. Our study complements the literature and provides new insights into several similar problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Actuarial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Actuarial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-022-00335-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-022-00335-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal insurance for a prudent decision maker under heterogeneous beliefs
In this paper we extend some of the results in the literature on optimal insurance under heterogeneous beliefs in the presence of the no-sabotage condition, by allowing the likelihood ratio function to be non-monotone. Under the assumption of prudence and a mild smoothness condition on the likelihood ratio function, we first partition the whole domain of loss into disjoint regions and then obtain an explicit parametric form for the optimal indemnity function over each piece, by resorting to the marginal indemnity function formulation. The case where there exists belief singularity between the decision maker and the insurer is also studied. As an illustration, we consider a special case of our setting in which the premium principle is a distortion premium principle. We then obtain a closed-form characterization of the optimal indemnity for the cases where premia are determined by Value-at-Risk and Tail Value-at-Risk. Our study complements the literature and provides new insights into several similar problems.
期刊介绍:
Actuarial science and actuarial finance deal with the study, modeling and managing of insurance and related financial risks for which stochastic models and statistical methods are available. Topics include classical actuarial mathematics such as life and non-life insurance, pension funds, reinsurance, and also more recent areas of interest such as risk management, asset-and-liability management, solvency, catastrophe modeling, systematic changes in risk parameters, longevity, etc. EAJ is designed for the promotion and development of actuarial science and actuarial finance. For this, we publish original actuarial research papers, either theoretical or applied, with innovative applications, as well as case studies on the evaluation and implementation of new mathematical methods in insurance and actuarial finance. We also welcome survey papers on topics of recent interest in the field. EAJ is the successor of six national actuarial journals, and particularly focuses on links between actuarial theory and practice. In order to serve as a platform for this exchange, we also welcome discussions (typically from practitioners, with a length of 1-3 pages) on published papers that highlight the application aspects of the discussed paper. Such discussions can also suggest modifications of the studied problem which are of particular interest to actuarial practice. Thus, they can serve as motivation for further studies.Finally, EAJ now also publishes ‘Letters’, which are short papers (up to 5 pages) that have academic and/or practical relevance and consist of e.g. an interesting idea, insight, clarification or observation of a cross-connection that deserves publication, but is shorter than a usual research article. A detailed description or proposition of a new relevant research question, short but curious mathematical results that deserve the attention of the actuarial community as well as novel applications of mathematical and actuarial concepts are equally welcome. Letter submissions will be reviewed within 6 weeks, so that they provide an opportunity to get good and pertinent ideas published quickly, while the same refereeing standards as for other submissions apply. Both academics and practitioners are encouraged to contribute to this new format. Authors are invited to submit their papers online via http://euaj.edmgr.com.