受益所有人登记册的运作:来自波兰的调查结果

IF 1.3 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Money Laundering Control Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1108/jmlc-09-2023-0149
Tomasz Michał Matras
{"title":"受益所有人登记册的运作:来自波兰的调查结果","authors":"Tomasz Michał Matras","doi":"10.1108/jmlc-09-2023-0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The implementation of the Directive 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing resulted in the enactment by the Polish Parliament of the Act of March 1, 2018, on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. One of the most important issues identified in the Act was the establishment of the Central Register of Beneficial Owners. The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the functioning of the Register in Poland from the perspective of three years since its establishment. The text presents the most important problems faced by reporting institutions and obliged entities due to discrepancies in the interpretation of the Act’s provisions – especially in terms of the definition of a beneficial owner.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The basic research approach was a comparative content analysis method. The objects of analysis included Polish Laws, Directive of the European Parliament and the Council (EU) 2015/849 and the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The theoretical legislative assumptions contained in the Acts were compared with reports, studies and communications prepared by public and private institutions. This made it possible to draw conclusions regarding the causes of problems with the functioning of the Register in Poland.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results of the research showed that the ambiguity of the definition of the beneficial owner leads to a number of problems on the part of reporting institutions, such as companies, foundations and associations. On the other hand, a large part of the data entered in the Register is questioned by obliged entities. The lack of personal data protection is also a problem. Consequently, this reduces the value of the Register as a tool that effectively mitigates the risk of money laundering.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The research focused only on the functioning of the Central Register of Beneficial Owners in Poland. The subject of the analysis addressed problems with the definition of beneficial owner, issues of data quality and openness and the process of verifying the Register’s data. The technical aspects of the Register operation and the financial penalties imposed by public oversight institutions were not reviewed. Also, no comparison was made with other European Union (EU) member states that have implemented Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) 2015/849.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study discusses the important issue of regulatory requirements introduced under EU regulations for private companies. Familiarization of companies, NGOs and obliged entities with the conclusions of the study can positively influence the consolidation of the correct interpretative path. In addition, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first scientific text that identifies and systematizes the most important problems of the Register’s functioning in Poland.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functioning of the register of beneficial owners: findings from Poland\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Michał Matras\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jmlc-09-2023-0149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The implementation of the Directive 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing resulted in the enactment by the Polish Parliament of the Act of March 1, 2018, on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. One of the most important issues identified in the Act was the establishment of the Central Register of Beneficial Owners. The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the functioning of the Register in Poland from the perspective of three years since its establishment. The text presents the most important problems faced by reporting institutions and obliged entities due to discrepancies in the interpretation of the Act’s provisions – especially in terms of the definition of a beneficial owner.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The basic research approach was a comparative content analysis method. The objects of analysis included Polish Laws, Directive of the European Parliament and the Council (EU) 2015/849 and the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The theoretical legislative assumptions contained in the Acts were compared with reports, studies and communications prepared by public and private institutions. This made it possible to draw conclusions regarding the causes of problems with the functioning of the Register in Poland.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results of the research showed that the ambiguity of the definition of the beneficial owner leads to a number of problems on the part of reporting institutions, such as companies, foundations and associations. On the other hand, a large part of the data entered in the Register is questioned by obliged entities. The lack of personal data protection is also a problem. Consequently, this reduces the value of the Register as a tool that effectively mitigates the risk of money laundering.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The research focused only on the functioning of the Central Register of Beneficial Owners in Poland. The subject of the analysis addressed problems with the definition of beneficial owner, issues of data quality and openness and the process of verifying the Register’s data. The technical aspects of the Register operation and the financial penalties imposed by public oversight institutions were not reviewed. Also, no comparison was made with other European Union (EU) member states that have implemented Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) 2015/849.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study discusses the important issue of regulatory requirements introduced under EU regulations for private companies. Familiarization of companies, NGOs and obliged entities with the conclusions of the study can positively influence the consolidation of the correct interpretative path. In addition, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first scientific text that identifies and systematizes the most important problems of the Register’s functioning in Poland.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":46042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Money Laundering Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Money Laundering Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-09-2023-0149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money Laundering Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-09-2023-0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲议会和理事会2015年5月20日关于防止将金融系统用于洗钱或恐怖主义融资目的的指令2015/849的实施导致波兰议会颁布了2018年3月1日关于防止洗钱和恐怖主义融资的法案。该法确定的最重要问题之一是建立受益所有人中央登记册。本文的目的是从登记册成立三年来的角度来批判性地分析其在波兰的运作。案文提出了报告机构和义务实体所面临的最重要的问题,这些问题是由于对该法条款的解释存在差异- -特别是在受益所有人的定义方面。设计/方法/方法基本研究方法是比较内容分析法。分析的对象包括波兰法律、欧洲议会和理事会指令(EU) 2015/849以及欧盟法院的判决。这些法令所载的理论立法假设与公共和私人机构编写的报告、研究和来文进行了比较。这使我们能够就登记册在波兰的运作出现问题的原因得出结论。研究结果表明,受益所有人定义的模糊性导致报告机构(如公司、基金会和协会)出现了一些问题。另一方面,在登记册中输入的大部分数据受到义务实体的质疑。个人数据保护的缺乏也是一个问题。因此,这降低了登记册作为有效减轻洗钱风险的工具的价值。研究限制/影响本研究仅关注波兰受益所有人中央登记册的运作。分析的主题涉及受益所有人的定义、数据质量和公开性问题以及登记册数据的核查过程等问题。登记册业务的技术方面和公共监督机构施加的经济处罚没有得到审查。此外,没有与其他实施欧洲议会和理事会(EU) 2015/849指令的欧盟(EU)成员国进行比较。原创性/价值本研究讨论了欧盟法规为私营公司引入的监管要求的重要问题。使公司、非政府组织和有义务的实体熟悉这项研究的结论可以对巩固正确的解释途径产生积极影响。此外,据作者所知,这是确定和系统化登记册在波兰运作的最重要问题的第一份科学文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Functioning of the register of beneficial owners: findings from Poland

Purpose

The implementation of the Directive 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing resulted in the enactment by the Polish Parliament of the Act of March 1, 2018, on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. One of the most important issues identified in the Act was the establishment of the Central Register of Beneficial Owners. The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the functioning of the Register in Poland from the perspective of three years since its establishment. The text presents the most important problems faced by reporting institutions and obliged entities due to discrepancies in the interpretation of the Act’s provisions – especially in terms of the definition of a beneficial owner.

Design/methodology/approach

The basic research approach was a comparative content analysis method. The objects of analysis included Polish Laws, Directive of the European Parliament and the Council (EU) 2015/849 and the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The theoretical legislative assumptions contained in the Acts were compared with reports, studies and communications prepared by public and private institutions. This made it possible to draw conclusions regarding the causes of problems with the functioning of the Register in Poland.

Findings

The results of the research showed that the ambiguity of the definition of the beneficial owner leads to a number of problems on the part of reporting institutions, such as companies, foundations and associations. On the other hand, a large part of the data entered in the Register is questioned by obliged entities. The lack of personal data protection is also a problem. Consequently, this reduces the value of the Register as a tool that effectively mitigates the risk of money laundering.

Research limitations/implications

The research focused only on the functioning of the Central Register of Beneficial Owners in Poland. The subject of the analysis addressed problems with the definition of beneficial owner, issues of data quality and openness and the process of verifying the Register’s data. The technical aspects of the Register operation and the financial penalties imposed by public oversight institutions were not reviewed. Also, no comparison was made with other European Union (EU) member states that have implemented Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) 2015/849.

Originality/value

This study discusses the important issue of regulatory requirements introduced under EU regulations for private companies. Familiarization of companies, NGOs and obliged entities with the conclusions of the study can positively influence the consolidation of the correct interpretative path. In addition, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first scientific text that identifies and systematizes the most important problems of the Register’s functioning in Poland.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Money Laundering Control
Journal of Money Laundering Control CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
27.30%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Facets of drug trafficking in Manipur, a border state of India: volumes, ethnicity and value Evolution of the whistleblowing regime: the UAE model Improving client risk classification with machine learning to increase anti-money laundering detection efficiency Deciphering the links: evaluating central bank transparency impact on corruption perception index in G20 countries Banks’ internal governance obligations vis-à-vis money laundering risks emerging from the new technology-enabled means to transfer funds or value (“crypto assets”)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1