偏好偏差对推荐系统绩效的纵向影响

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Systems Research Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1287/isre.2021.0133
Meizi Zhou, Jingjing Zhang, Gediminas Adomavicius
{"title":"偏好偏差对推荐系统绩效的纵向影响","authors":"Meizi Zhou, Jingjing Zhang, Gediminas Adomavicius","doi":"10.1287/isre.2021.0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommender systems are ubiquitous on various online platforms and provide significant value to the users in helping them find relevant content/items to consume. After item consumption, users can often provide feedback (i.e., their preference ratings for the item) to the system. Research studies have shown that recommender systems’ predictions, observed by users, can cause biases in users’ postconsumption preference ratings. Because these ratings are typically fed back to the system as training data for future predictions, this process is likely to influence the system’s performance over time. We use a simulation approach to investigate the longitudinal impact of preference biases on the dynamics of recommender systems’ performance. Our results reveal that preference biases significantly impair recommendation performance and users’ consumption outcomes, and larger biases cause disproportionately large negative effects. Additionally, less popular and less distinctive (in terms of their content) items are more susceptible to preference biases. Furthermore, considering the substantial impact of preference biases on recommendation performance, we examine the issue of debiasing user-submitted ratings. We find that relying solely on historical rating data is unlikely to be effective in debiasing; thus, we propose/evaluate new debiasing approaches that use additional relevant information that can be collected by recommendation platforms.","PeriodicalId":48411,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal Impact of Preference Biases on Recommender Systems’ Performance\",\"authors\":\"Meizi Zhou, Jingjing Zhang, Gediminas Adomavicius\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/isre.2021.0133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recommender systems are ubiquitous on various online platforms and provide significant value to the users in helping them find relevant content/items to consume. After item consumption, users can often provide feedback (i.e., their preference ratings for the item) to the system. Research studies have shown that recommender systems’ predictions, observed by users, can cause biases in users’ postconsumption preference ratings. Because these ratings are typically fed back to the system as training data for future predictions, this process is likely to influence the system’s performance over time. We use a simulation approach to investigate the longitudinal impact of preference biases on the dynamics of recommender systems’ performance. Our results reveal that preference biases significantly impair recommendation performance and users’ consumption outcomes, and larger biases cause disproportionately large negative effects. Additionally, less popular and less distinctive (in terms of their content) items are more susceptible to preference biases. Furthermore, considering the substantial impact of preference biases on recommendation performance, we examine the issue of debiasing user-submitted ratings. We find that relying solely on historical rating data is unlikely to be effective in debiasing; thus, we propose/evaluate new debiasing approaches that use additional relevant information that can be collected by recommendation platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推荐系统在各种在线平台上无处不在,并为用户提供了重要的价值,帮助他们找到相关的内容/项目来消费。在物品消费之后,用户通常可以向系统提供反馈(例如,他们对物品的偏好等级)。研究表明,用户观察到的推荐系统的预测可能会导致用户消费后偏好评级的偏差。因为这些评级通常作为未来预测的训练数据反馈给系统,所以随着时间的推移,这个过程可能会影响系统的性能。我们使用模拟方法来研究偏好偏差对推荐系统性能动态的纵向影响。我们的研究结果表明,偏好偏差显著影响推荐性能和用户的消费结果,较大的偏好偏差会导致不成比例的大的负面影响。此外,不太受欢迎和不太独特(就其内容而言)的道具更容易受到偏好偏见的影响。此外,考虑到偏好偏差对推荐性能的重大影响,我们研究了消除用户提交评级偏见的问题。我们发现,仅仅依靠历史评级数据不太可能有效地消除偏见;因此,我们提出/评估使用推荐平台可以收集的额外相关信息的新的去偏见方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Longitudinal Impact of Preference Biases on Recommender Systems’ Performance
Recommender systems are ubiquitous on various online platforms and provide significant value to the users in helping them find relevant content/items to consume. After item consumption, users can often provide feedback (i.e., their preference ratings for the item) to the system. Research studies have shown that recommender systems’ predictions, observed by users, can cause biases in users’ postconsumption preference ratings. Because these ratings are typically fed back to the system as training data for future predictions, this process is likely to influence the system’s performance over time. We use a simulation approach to investigate the longitudinal impact of preference biases on the dynamics of recommender systems’ performance. Our results reveal that preference biases significantly impair recommendation performance and users’ consumption outcomes, and larger biases cause disproportionately large negative effects. Additionally, less popular and less distinctive (in terms of their content) items are more susceptible to preference biases. Furthermore, considering the substantial impact of preference biases on recommendation performance, we examine the issue of debiasing user-submitted ratings. We find that relying solely on historical rating data is unlikely to be effective in debiasing; thus, we propose/evaluate new debiasing approaches that use additional relevant information that can be collected by recommendation platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: ISR (Information Systems Research) is a journal of INFORMS, the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences. Information Systems Research is a leading international journal of theory, research, and intellectual development, focused on information systems in organizations, institutions, the economy, and society.
期刊最新文献
Win by Hook or Crook? Self-Injecting Favorable Online Reviews to Fight Adjacent Rivals Omnificence or Differentiation? An Empirical Study of Knowledge Structure and Career Development of IT Workers Timely Quality Problem Resolution in Peer-Production Systems: The Impact of Bots, Policy Citations, and Contributor Experience Does David Make A Goliath? Impact of Rival’s Expertise Signals on Online User Engagement How to Make My Bug Bounty Cost-Effective? A Game-Theoretical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1