既不是多级治理,也不是战场。了解欧洲中小地区移民融合的政治

Governance Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1111/gove.12833
Tiziana Caponio, Andrea Pettrachin
{"title":"既不是多级治理,也不是战场。了解欧洲中小地区移民融合的政治","authors":"Tiziana Caponio, Andrea Pettrachin","doi":"10.1111/gove.12833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the link between migration governance and politics in small and medium-sized localities (SMsLs), asking: what modes of immigrant integration governance emerge in SMsLs?; how are these modes of governance shaped by political factors such as local governments' (LGs) political affiliation, the presence/absence of radical right parties (RPPs) in local councils and the political affiliation of governments at higher levels? To answer these questions, we selected 26 European SMsLs across seven EU countries and applied a mixed-method design combining social network analysis and qualitative content analysis. We find that political dynamics decisively shape integration governance in SMsLs. Centre-left LGs have more frequent and collaborative relations with nonpublic actors, especially when RRPs hold seat in local councils and support regional/national governments. Centre-right LGs usually disengage from integration governance or, when facing strong RRPs, develop strategies to maintain control on issues perceived as highly salient. Vertical relations are either conflictual or absent in all SMsLs.","PeriodicalId":501138,"journal":{"name":"Governance","volume":"427 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neither multilevel governance nor battleground. Understanding the politics of immigrant integration in small and medium European localities\",\"authors\":\"Tiziana Caponio, Andrea Pettrachin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gove.12833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the link between migration governance and politics in small and medium-sized localities (SMsLs), asking: what modes of immigrant integration governance emerge in SMsLs?; how are these modes of governance shaped by political factors such as local governments' (LGs) political affiliation, the presence/absence of radical right parties (RPPs) in local councils and the political affiliation of governments at higher levels? To answer these questions, we selected 26 European SMsLs across seven EU countries and applied a mixed-method design combining social network analysis and qualitative content analysis. We find that political dynamics decisively shape integration governance in SMsLs. Centre-left LGs have more frequent and collaborative relations with nonpublic actors, especially when RRPs hold seat in local councils and support regional/national governments. Centre-right LGs usually disengage from integration governance or, when facing strong RRPs, develop strategies to maintain control on issues perceived as highly salient. Vertical relations are either conflictual or absent in all SMsLs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Governance\",\"volume\":\"427 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了中小地方(SMsLs)移民治理与政治之间的联系,提出了以下问题:中小地方出现了哪些移民融合治理模式?这些治理模式如何受到政治因素的影响,如地方政府(LGs)的政治派别,地方议会中激进右翼政党(RPPs)的存在/缺失,以及更高级别政府的政治派别?为了回答这些问题,我们选择了7个欧盟国家的26个欧洲短信用户,并采用了结合社会网络分析和定性内容分析的混合方法设计。我们发现,政治动态决定性地塑造了smsl中的集成治理。中间偏左的地方政府集团与非公共行为体有更频繁的合作关系,尤其是在地方议会中拥有席位并支持地区/国家政府的地方政府集团。中右翼的LGs通常脱离整合治理,或者在面对强大的rrp时,制定策略来保持对被认为非常突出的问题的控制。垂直关系在所有sms中要么是冲突的,要么是不存在的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neither multilevel governance nor battleground. Understanding the politics of immigrant integration in small and medium European localities
This article explores the link between migration governance and politics in small and medium-sized localities (SMsLs), asking: what modes of immigrant integration governance emerge in SMsLs?; how are these modes of governance shaped by political factors such as local governments' (LGs) political affiliation, the presence/absence of radical right parties (RPPs) in local councils and the political affiliation of governments at higher levels? To answer these questions, we selected 26 European SMsLs across seven EU countries and applied a mixed-method design combining social network analysis and qualitative content analysis. We find that political dynamics decisively shape integration governance in SMsLs. Centre-left LGs have more frequent and collaborative relations with nonpublic actors, especially when RRPs hold seat in local councils and support regional/national governments. Centre-right LGs usually disengage from integration governance or, when facing strong RRPs, develop strategies to maintain control on issues perceived as highly salient. Vertical relations are either conflictual or absent in all SMsLs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The political economy of open contracting reforms in low‐ and middle‐income countries In court we trust? Political affinity and citizen's attitudes toward court's decisions A red flag for public goods? The correlates of civil society restrictions Drivers of transnational administrative coordination on super‐wicked policy issues: The role of institutional homophily European union funding of interest groups: Reassessing the balancing function and the promotion of good organizational practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1