水形态动力学模拟中砂滑方法的数值研究

IF 1 3区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering Pub Date : 2022-09-16 DOI:10.1680/jmaen.2021.016
Amir Bordbar, Soroosh Sharifi, Hassan Hemida
{"title":"水形态动力学模拟中砂滑方法的数值研究","authors":"Amir Bordbar, Soroosh Sharifi, Hassan Hemida","doi":"10.1680/jmaen.2021.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In numerical modelling of scour around riverine and coastal structures using a hydro-morphodynamic model, a discrete sand sliding procedure needs to be implemented to avoid the occurrence of unrealistic bed profiles. In this study, two commonly employed sand sliding techniques, namely, the artificial transport rate method (ATRM) and the geometry-based method (GBM), are implemented in OpenFOAM and their performances are evaluated for five three-dimensional test cases. The test cases are classified into cases with and without sediment transport induced by a flow field. In the first three test cases, in the absence of a flow field, sand heap avalanches for different geometries and bed boundary grid structures are modelled to compare the methods in terms of simulation time and mass continuity. In test cases 4 and 5, in the presence of a flow field, the sensitivity of the sand sliding methods coupled with a hydro-morphodynamic model to different bed mesh structures is evaluated in modelling scour. The results of the analysis demonstrate that modelling of the sand sliding procedure using ATRM requires higher computational time, while its results are highly independent of the bed mesh structure with lower mass continuity error, <0.2% in all test cases, in comparison with GBM.","PeriodicalId":54575,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical investigation of sand sliding methods for hydro-morphodynamic modelling\",\"authors\":\"Amir Bordbar, Soroosh Sharifi, Hassan Hemida\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jmaen.2021.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In numerical modelling of scour around riverine and coastal structures using a hydro-morphodynamic model, a discrete sand sliding procedure needs to be implemented to avoid the occurrence of unrealistic bed profiles. In this study, two commonly employed sand sliding techniques, namely, the artificial transport rate method (ATRM) and the geometry-based method (GBM), are implemented in OpenFOAM and their performances are evaluated for five three-dimensional test cases. The test cases are classified into cases with and without sediment transport induced by a flow field. In the first three test cases, in the absence of a flow field, sand heap avalanches for different geometries and bed boundary grid structures are modelled to compare the methods in terms of simulation time and mass continuity. In test cases 4 and 5, in the presence of a flow field, the sensitivity of the sand sliding methods coupled with a hydro-morphodynamic model to different bed mesh structures is evaluated in modelling scour. The results of the analysis demonstrate that modelling of the sand sliding procedure using ATRM requires higher computational time, while its results are highly independent of the bed mesh structure with lower mass continuity error, <0.2% in all test cases, in comparison with GBM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmaen.2021.016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmaen.2021.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在利用水形态动力学模型对河流和海岸构筑物冲刷进行数值模拟时,需要采用离散滑沙程序来避免出现不真实的河床剖面。本研究在OpenFOAM中实现了两种常用的滑砂技术,即人工输运率法(ATRM)和基于几何的方法(GBM),并通过5个三维测试用例对其性能进行了评价。试验用例分为有流场输沙和无流场输沙两种。在前三个测试用例中,在没有流场的情况下,对不同几何形状和床界网格结构的沙堆雪崩进行了建模,比较了模拟时间和质量连续性方面的方法。在试验用例4和5中,在流场存在的情况下,在模拟冲刷时,评估了砂滑方法与水形态动力学模型耦合对不同床网结构的敏感性。分析结果表明,与GBM模型相比,ATRM模型对砂体滑动过程的模拟需要更高的计算时间,而其结果与床网结构高度无关,且质量连续误差较小,在所有试验用例中均为0.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical investigation of sand sliding methods for hydro-morphodynamic modelling
In numerical modelling of scour around riverine and coastal structures using a hydro-morphodynamic model, a discrete sand sliding procedure needs to be implemented to avoid the occurrence of unrealistic bed profiles. In this study, two commonly employed sand sliding techniques, namely, the artificial transport rate method (ATRM) and the geometry-based method (GBM), are implemented in OpenFOAM and their performances are evaluated for five three-dimensional test cases. The test cases are classified into cases with and without sediment transport induced by a flow field. In the first three test cases, in the absence of a flow field, sand heap avalanches for different geometries and bed boundary grid structures are modelled to compare the methods in terms of simulation time and mass continuity. In test cases 4 and 5, in the presence of a flow field, the sensitivity of the sand sliding methods coupled with a hydro-morphodynamic model to different bed mesh structures is evaluated in modelling scour. The results of the analysis demonstrate that modelling of the sand sliding procedure using ATRM requires higher computational time, while its results are highly independent of the bed mesh structure with lower mass continuity error, <0.2% in all test cases, in comparison with GBM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
14.80%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maritime Engineering publishes technical papers relevant to civil engineering in port, estuarine, coastal and offshore environments. Relevant to consulting, client and contracting engineers as well as researchers and academics, the journal focuses on safe and sustainable engineering in the salt-water environment and comprises papers regarding management, planning, design, analysis, construction, operation, maintenance and applied research. The journal publishes papers and articles from industry and academia that conveys advanced research that those developing, designing or constructing schemes can begin to apply, as well as papers on good practices that others can learn from and utilise.
期刊最新文献
60MLD Floating Pump Station, Waikato River, New Zealand Performance of a novel concept of a monopile adapted with pre-tensioned tethers for intermediate waters Finite element analysis of a monopile under one-way and two-way lateral cyclic loading Preface: Offshore Structures and Subsea Technologies Risk assessment model of work safety in container dry ports: The adoption of the continuous risk matrix and Fuzzy AHP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1