图模型的伪似然估计:存在性与唯一性

Benjamin Roycraft, Bala Rajaratnam
{"title":"图模型的伪似然估计:存在性与唯一性","authors":"Benjamin Roycraft, Bala Rajaratnam","doi":"arxiv-2311.15528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graphical and sparse (inverse) covariance models have found widespread use in\nmodern sample-starved high dimensional applications. A part of their wide\nappeal stems from the significantly low sample sizes required for the existence\nof estimators, especially in comparison with the classical full covariance\nmodel. For undirected Gaussian graphical models, the minimum sample size\nrequired for the existence of maximum likelihood estimators had been an open\nquestion for almost half a century, and has been recently settled. The very\nsame question for pseudo-likelihood estimators has remained unsolved ever since\ntheir introduction in the '70s. Pseudo-likelihood estimators have recently\nreceived renewed attention as they impose fewer restrictive assumptions and\nhave better computational tractability, improved statistical performance, and\nappropriateness in modern high dimensional applications, thus renewing interest\nin this longstanding problem. In this paper, we undertake a comprehensive study\nof this open problem within the context of the two classes of pseudo-likelihood\nmethods proposed in the literature. We provide a precise answer to this\nquestion for both pseudo-likelihood approaches and relate the corresponding\nsolutions to their Gaussian counterpart.","PeriodicalId":501330,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory","volume":"34 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pseudo-likelihood Estimators for Graphical Models: Existence and Uniqueness\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Roycraft, Bala Rajaratnam\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2311.15528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Graphical and sparse (inverse) covariance models have found widespread use in\\nmodern sample-starved high dimensional applications. A part of their wide\\nappeal stems from the significantly low sample sizes required for the existence\\nof estimators, especially in comparison with the classical full covariance\\nmodel. For undirected Gaussian graphical models, the minimum sample size\\nrequired for the existence of maximum likelihood estimators had been an open\\nquestion for almost half a century, and has been recently settled. The very\\nsame question for pseudo-likelihood estimators has remained unsolved ever since\\ntheir introduction in the '70s. Pseudo-likelihood estimators have recently\\nreceived renewed attention as they impose fewer restrictive assumptions and\\nhave better computational tractability, improved statistical performance, and\\nappropriateness in modern high dimensional applications, thus renewing interest\\nin this longstanding problem. In this paper, we undertake a comprehensive study\\nof this open problem within the context of the two classes of pseudo-likelihood\\nmethods proposed in the literature. We provide a precise answer to this\\nquestion for both pseudo-likelihood approaches and relate the corresponding\\nsolutions to their Gaussian counterpart.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.15528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Statistics Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.15528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图形化和稀疏(逆)协方差模型在现代缺乏样本的高维应用中得到了广泛的应用。它们的广泛吸引力的一部分源于存在估计量所需的显著低样本量,特别是与经典的全协方差模型相比。对于无向高斯图形模型,最大似然估计存在所需的最小样本量是近半个世纪以来一个悬而未决的问题,最近才得到解决。伪似然估计器自70年代问世以来,同样的问题一直没有得到解决。伪似然估计最近受到了新的关注,因为它们施加了更少的限制性假设,具有更好的计算可追溯性,改进的统计性能,以及在现代高维应用中的适用性,从而重新引起了对这个长期存在的问题的兴趣。在本文中,我们在文献中提出的两类伪似然方法的背景下对这个开放问题进行了全面的研究。我们为这两种伪似然方法提供了这个问题的精确答案,并将相应的解与它们的高斯对应解联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pseudo-likelihood Estimators for Graphical Models: Existence and Uniqueness
Graphical and sparse (inverse) covariance models have found widespread use in modern sample-starved high dimensional applications. A part of their wide appeal stems from the significantly low sample sizes required for the existence of estimators, especially in comparison with the classical full covariance model. For undirected Gaussian graphical models, the minimum sample size required for the existence of maximum likelihood estimators had been an open question for almost half a century, and has been recently settled. The very same question for pseudo-likelihood estimators has remained unsolved ever since their introduction in the '70s. Pseudo-likelihood estimators have recently received renewed attention as they impose fewer restrictive assumptions and have better computational tractability, improved statistical performance, and appropriateness in modern high dimensional applications, thus renewing interest in this longstanding problem. In this paper, we undertake a comprehensive study of this open problem within the context of the two classes of pseudo-likelihood methods proposed in the literature. We provide a precise answer to this question for both pseudo-likelihood approaches and relate the corresponding solutions to their Gaussian counterpart.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Precision-based designs for sequential randomized experiments Strang Splitting for Parametric Inference in Second-order Stochastic Differential Equations Stability of a Generalized Debiased Lasso with Applications to Resampling-Based Variable Selection Tuning parameter selection in econometrics Limiting Behavior of Maxima under Dependence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1