Behnam Moeini, John M. Linford, Neal Gallagher, Matthew R. Linford
{"title":"表面分析洞察注:x射线光电子能谱图像的光谱聚类分析示例","authors":"Behnam Moeini, John M. Linford, Neal Gallagher, Matthew R. Linford","doi":"10.1002/sia.7270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identification of similar and dissimilar spectra is an important part of analyzing X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) images. Cluster analysis (CA) is a commonly used exploratory data analysis (EDA) method that groups similar spectra in a data set. CA can be performed in either an agglomerative fashion, for example, using Ward's method, which involves successively linking together/clustering the most similar spectra in a data set, or in a divisive fashion, for example, using the K-means approach, which involves partitioning all the data into a specified number of clusters. In this note, we show the application of CA to an XPS image dataset. The use of Ward's method identified two major clusters in the image, where one of the clusters appeared as two subclusters. The K-means image based on two clusters agrees well with previous analyses of the same image. The average spectra corresponding to clusters helped confirm the assignments made by the CA algorithms, as did a multivariate curve resolution (MCR) analysis of the interior region identified in our cluster analysis. “Elbow” plots can help determine the number of clusters to keep in K-means clustering. The combination of the agglomerative and divisive forms of CA, where the first informs the second, can be effective in revealing the structures of XPS image datasets. The Procrustean bed is a metaphor for overfitting and underfitting in EDA.","PeriodicalId":22062,"journal":{"name":"Surface and Interface Analysis","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface analysis insight note: An example of a cluster analysis of spectra from an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy image\",\"authors\":\"Behnam Moeini, John M. Linford, Neal Gallagher, Matthew R. Linford\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sia.7270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identification of similar and dissimilar spectra is an important part of analyzing X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) images. Cluster analysis (CA) is a commonly used exploratory data analysis (EDA) method that groups similar spectra in a data set. CA can be performed in either an agglomerative fashion, for example, using Ward's method, which involves successively linking together/clustering the most similar spectra in a data set, or in a divisive fashion, for example, using the K-means approach, which involves partitioning all the data into a specified number of clusters. In this note, we show the application of CA to an XPS image dataset. The use of Ward's method identified two major clusters in the image, where one of the clusters appeared as two subclusters. The K-means image based on two clusters agrees well with previous analyses of the same image. The average spectra corresponding to clusters helped confirm the assignments made by the CA algorithms, as did a multivariate curve resolution (MCR) analysis of the interior region identified in our cluster analysis. “Elbow” plots can help determine the number of clusters to keep in K-means clustering. The combination of the agglomerative and divisive forms of CA, where the first informs the second, can be effective in revealing the structures of XPS image datasets. The Procrustean bed is a metaphor for overfitting and underfitting in EDA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surface and Interface Analysis\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surface and Interface Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.7270\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surface and Interface Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.7270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surface analysis insight note: An example of a cluster analysis of spectra from an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy image
Identification of similar and dissimilar spectra is an important part of analyzing X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) images. Cluster analysis (CA) is a commonly used exploratory data analysis (EDA) method that groups similar spectra in a data set. CA can be performed in either an agglomerative fashion, for example, using Ward's method, which involves successively linking together/clustering the most similar spectra in a data set, or in a divisive fashion, for example, using the K-means approach, which involves partitioning all the data into a specified number of clusters. In this note, we show the application of CA to an XPS image dataset. The use of Ward's method identified two major clusters in the image, where one of the clusters appeared as two subclusters. The K-means image based on two clusters agrees well with previous analyses of the same image. The average spectra corresponding to clusters helped confirm the assignments made by the CA algorithms, as did a multivariate curve resolution (MCR) analysis of the interior region identified in our cluster analysis. “Elbow” plots can help determine the number of clusters to keep in K-means clustering. The combination of the agglomerative and divisive forms of CA, where the first informs the second, can be effective in revealing the structures of XPS image datasets. The Procrustean bed is a metaphor for overfitting and underfitting in EDA.
期刊介绍:
Surface and Interface Analysis is devoted to the publication of papers dealing with the development and application of techniques for the characterization of surfaces, interfaces and thin films. Papers dealing with standardization and quantification are particularly welcome, and also those which deal with the application of these techniques to industrial problems. Papers dealing with the purely theoretical aspects of the technique will also be considered. Review articles will be published; prior consultation with one of the Editors is advised in these cases. Papers must clearly be of scientific value in the field and will be submitted to two independent referees. Contributions must be in English and must not have been published elsewhere, and authors must agree not to communicate the same material for publication to any other journal. Authors are invited to submit their papers for publication to John Watts (UK only), Jose Sanz (Rest of Europe), John T. Grant (all non-European countries, except Japan) or R. Shimizu (Japan only).