可再生能源社区激励的最优投资与公平分担规则

Almendra Awerkin, Paolo Falbo, Tiziano Vargiolu
{"title":"可再生能源社区激励的最优投资与公平分担规则","authors":"Almendra Awerkin, Paolo Falbo, Tiziano Vargiolu","doi":"arxiv-2311.12055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus on Renewable Energy Communities (REC) is fastly growing after the\nEuropean Union (EU) has introduced a dedicated regulation in 2018. The idea of\ncreating local groups of citizens, small- and medium-sized companies, and\npublic institutions, which self-produce and self-consume energy from renewable\nsources is at the same time a way to save money for the participants, increase\nefficiency of the energy system, and reduce CO$_2$ emissions. Member states\ninside the EU are fixing more detailed regulations, which describe, how public\nincentives are measured. A natural objective for the incentive policies is of\ncourse to promote the self-consumption of a REC. A sophisticated incentive\npolicy is that based on the so called 'virtual framework'. Under this framework\nall the energy produced by a REC is sold to the market, and all the energy\nconsumed must be paid to retailers: self-consumption occurs only 'virtually',\nthanks a money compensation (paid by a central authority) for every MWh\nproduced and consumed by the REC in the same hour. In this context, two\nproblems have to be solved: the optimal investment in new technologies and a\nfair division of the incentive among the community members. We address these\nproblems by considering a particular type of REC, composed by a representative\nhousehold and a biogas producer, where the potential demand of the community is\ngiven by the household's demand, while both members produce renewable energy.\nWe set the problem as a leader-follower problem: the leader decide how to share\nthe incentive for the self-consumed energy, while the followers decide their\nown optimal installation strategy. We solve the leader's problem by searching\nfor a Nash bargaining solution for the incentive's fair division, while the\nfollower problem is solved by finding the Nash equilibria of a static\ncompetitive game between the members.","PeriodicalId":501487,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Investment and Fair Sharing Rules of the Incentives for Renewable Energy Communities\",\"authors\":\"Almendra Awerkin, Paolo Falbo, Tiziano Vargiolu\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2311.12055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The focus on Renewable Energy Communities (REC) is fastly growing after the\\nEuropean Union (EU) has introduced a dedicated regulation in 2018. The idea of\\ncreating local groups of citizens, small- and medium-sized companies, and\\npublic institutions, which self-produce and self-consume energy from renewable\\nsources is at the same time a way to save money for the participants, increase\\nefficiency of the energy system, and reduce CO$_2$ emissions. Member states\\ninside the EU are fixing more detailed regulations, which describe, how public\\nincentives are measured. A natural objective for the incentive policies is of\\ncourse to promote the self-consumption of a REC. A sophisticated incentive\\npolicy is that based on the so called 'virtual framework'. Under this framework\\nall the energy produced by a REC is sold to the market, and all the energy\\nconsumed must be paid to retailers: self-consumption occurs only 'virtually',\\nthanks a money compensation (paid by a central authority) for every MWh\\nproduced and consumed by the REC in the same hour. In this context, two\\nproblems have to be solved: the optimal investment in new technologies and a\\nfair division of the incentive among the community members. We address these\\nproblems by considering a particular type of REC, composed by a representative\\nhousehold and a biogas producer, where the potential demand of the community is\\ngiven by the household's demand, while both members produce renewable energy.\\nWe set the problem as a leader-follower problem: the leader decide how to share\\nthe incentive for the self-consumed energy, while the followers decide their\\nown optimal installation strategy. We solve the leader's problem by searching\\nfor a Nash bargaining solution for the incentive's fair division, while the\\nfollower problem is solved by finding the Nash equilibria of a static\\ncompetitive game between the members.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.12055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.12055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧盟(EU)于2018年推出专门法规后,对可再生能源社区(REC)的关注正在迅速增长。建立由当地居民、中小企业和公共机构组成的团体,自行生产和使用可再生能源,同时为参与者节省资金,提高能源系统的效率,减少二氧化碳排放。欧盟成员国正在制定更详细的法规,描述如何衡量公共激励。激励政策的自然目标当然是促进REC的自我消费。一个复杂的激励政策是基于所谓的“虚拟框架”。在这个框架下,REC生产的所有能源都出售给市场,所有消耗的能源都必须支付给零售商:由于REC在同一小时内生产和消耗的每兆瓦电力都有货币补偿(由中央当局支付),因此自我消费只发生“虚拟”。在此背景下,必须解决两个问题:对新技术的最优投资和社区成员之间激励的公平分配。我们通过考虑一种特定类型的REC来解决这些问题,该REC由一个有代表性的家庭和一个沼气生产商组成,其中社区的潜在需求由家庭的需求给出,而双方成员都生产可再生能源。我们将问题设置为一个领导-追随者问题:领导者决定如何分享自己消耗的能量的激励,而追随者决定自己的最优安装策略。我们通过寻找激励公平分配的纳什议价解来解决领导者问题,而通过寻找成员之间静态竞争博弈的纳什均衡来解决追随者问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal Investment and Fair Sharing Rules of the Incentives for Renewable Energy Communities
The focus on Renewable Energy Communities (REC) is fastly growing after the European Union (EU) has introduced a dedicated regulation in 2018. The idea of creating local groups of citizens, small- and medium-sized companies, and public institutions, which self-produce and self-consume energy from renewable sources is at the same time a way to save money for the participants, increase efficiency of the energy system, and reduce CO$_2$ emissions. Member states inside the EU are fixing more detailed regulations, which describe, how public incentives are measured. A natural objective for the incentive policies is of course to promote the self-consumption of a REC. A sophisticated incentive policy is that based on the so called 'virtual framework'. Under this framework all the energy produced by a REC is sold to the market, and all the energy consumed must be paid to retailers: self-consumption occurs only 'virtually', thanks a money compensation (paid by a central authority) for every MWh produced and consumed by the REC in the same hour. In this context, two problems have to be solved: the optimal investment in new technologies and a fair division of the incentive among the community members. We address these problems by considering a particular type of REC, composed by a representative household and a biogas producer, where the potential demand of the community is given by the household's demand, while both members produce renewable energy. We set the problem as a leader-follower problem: the leader decide how to share the incentive for the self-consumed energy, while the followers decide their own optimal installation strategy. We solve the leader's problem by searching for a Nash bargaining solution for the incentive's fair division, while the follower problem is solved by finding the Nash equilibria of a static competitive game between the members.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty of Supply Chains: Risk and Ambiguity Crypto Market Analysis & Real-Estate Business Protocol Proposal | Application of Ethereum Blockchain Monetary Policies on Green Financial Markets: Evidence from a Multi-Moment Connectedness Network Simulating the economic impact of rationality through reinforcement learning and agent-based modelling The Economy and Public Diplomacy: An Analysis of RT's Economic Content and Context on Facebook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1