在线研究方法课程中效用价值干预的效果检验:Hulleman et al.(2017,研究2)的概念复制

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching of Psychology Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.1177/00986283221101850
Paul C. Price, Kiana Crisosto, Anthony Carvalho, Constance J. Jones, Meaghan McCready, Amber Shaver, Andrea N. Wiemann
{"title":"在线研究方法课程中效用价值干预的效果检验:Hulleman et al.(2017,研究2)的概念复制","authors":"Paul C. Price, Kiana Crisosto, Anthony Carvalho, Constance J. Jones, Meaghan McCready, Amber Shaver, Andrea N. Wiemann","doi":"10.1177/00986283221101850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h2>Background</h2><p>Utility-value (UV) classroom interventions typically involve students completing assignments that involve writing about the usefulness of the course material. They are widely recommended and have received some empirical support.</p><h2>Objective</h2><p>This study tested the effectiveness of a UV intervention in an online research methods course. It was a conceptual replication of a study by Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2).</p><h2>Method</h2><p>Students (<i>N</i> = 264) were randomly assigned to complete three assignments that required them to write about the usefulness of course material or three assignments that required them to summarize course material. The groups were compared in terms of their scores on a research methods knowledge test, their final papers, their final exams, and their final point totals, along with measures of the interestingness and usefulness of the course material.</p><h2>Results</h2><p>There were no differences between conditions on any of the outcome variables.</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>The UV intervention was ineffective. Further research is needed to establish the conditions under which such interventions are and are not effective.</p><h2>Teaching Implications</h2><p>UV interventions do not necessarily improve student performance. Instructors who use them should consider doing so in a way that allows for an assessment of their effect in their local context.</p>","PeriodicalId":47708,"journal":{"name":"Teaching of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the Effects of a Utility Value Intervention in an Online Research Methods Course: A Conceptual Replication of Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2)\",\"authors\":\"Paul C. Price, Kiana Crisosto, Anthony Carvalho, Constance J. Jones, Meaghan McCready, Amber Shaver, Andrea N. Wiemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00986283221101850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h2>Background</h2><p>Utility-value (UV) classroom interventions typically involve students completing assignments that involve writing about the usefulness of the course material. They are widely recommended and have received some empirical support.</p><h2>Objective</h2><p>This study tested the effectiveness of a UV intervention in an online research methods course. It was a conceptual replication of a study by Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2).</p><h2>Method</h2><p>Students (<i>N</i> = 264) were randomly assigned to complete three assignments that required them to write about the usefulness of course material or three assignments that required them to summarize course material. The groups were compared in terms of their scores on a research methods knowledge test, their final papers, their final exams, and their final point totals, along with measures of the interestingness and usefulness of the course material.</p><h2>Results</h2><p>There were no differences between conditions on any of the outcome variables.</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p>The UV intervention was ineffective. Further research is needed to establish the conditions under which such interventions are and are not effective.</p><h2>Teaching Implications</h2><p>UV interventions do not necessarily improve student performance. Instructors who use them should consider doing so in a way that allows for an assessment of their effect in their local context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221101850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221101850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实用价值(UV)课堂干预通常涉及学生完成涉及撰写课程材料有用性的作业。它们被广泛推荐,并得到了一些实证支持。目的探讨紫外线干预在线研究方法课程的有效性。这是对Hulleman等人(2017,study 2)研究的概念复制。方法随机分配学生(N = 264)完成三项作业,要求他们撰写课程材料的有用性,或三项作业要求他们总结课程材料。研究人员比较了两组学生在研究方法知识测试、期末论文、期末考试和期末总分数方面的得分,并衡量了课程材料的趣味性和实用性。结果两组在各结果变量上均无差异。结论紫外线干预无效。需要进一步的研究来确定这些干预措施有效和无效的条件。教学意义suv干预不一定能提高学生的表现。使用这些工具的教师应该考虑在使用这些工具时,对其在当地环境中的效果进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing the Effects of a Utility Value Intervention in an Online Research Methods Course: A Conceptual Replication of Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2)

Background

Utility-value (UV) classroom interventions typically involve students completing assignments that involve writing about the usefulness of the course material. They are widely recommended and have received some empirical support.

Objective

This study tested the effectiveness of a UV intervention in an online research methods course. It was a conceptual replication of a study by Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2).

Method

Students (N = 264) were randomly assigned to complete three assignments that required them to write about the usefulness of course material or three assignments that required them to summarize course material. The groups were compared in terms of their scores on a research methods knowledge test, their final papers, their final exams, and their final point totals, along with measures of the interestingness and usefulness of the course material.

Results

There were no differences between conditions on any of the outcome variables.

Conclusion

The UV intervention was ineffective. Further research is needed to establish the conditions under which such interventions are and are not effective.

Teaching Implications

UV interventions do not necessarily improve student performance. Instructors who use them should consider doing so in a way that allows for an assessment of their effect in their local context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Basic and introductory psychology courses are the most popular electives on college campuses and a rapidly growing addition to high school curriculums. As such, Teaching of Psychology is indispensable as a source book for teaching methods and as a forum for new ideas. Dedicated to improving the learning and teaching process at all educational levels, this journal has established itself as a leading source of information and inspiration for all who teach psychology. Coverage includes empirical research on teaching and learning; studies of teacher or student characteristics; subject matter or content reviews for class use; investigations of student, course, or teacher assessment; professional problems of teachers; essays on teaching.
期刊最新文献
Does Lecture Style Matter in Asynchronous Online Interteaching? Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing The Use of AI Disclosure Statements in Teaching: Developing Skills for Psychologists of the Future Navigating the New Frontier: Recommendations to Address the Crisis and Potential of AI in the Classroom Recommendations for Implementing Anti-Ableism Across the Psychology Curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1