加密资产监管市场(MiCA)和欧盟数字金融战略

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW Capital Markets Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI:10.1093/cmlj/kmab005
Zetzsche D, Annunziata F, Arner D, et al.
{"title":"加密资产监管市场(MiCA)和欧盟数字金融战略","authors":"Zetzsche D, Annunziata F, Arner D, et al.","doi":"10.1093/cmlj/kmab005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><div><div>Key points</div><ul><li>The European Commission published its new Digital Finance Strategy on 24 September 2020. One of the centrepieces of the Strategy is the draft Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA), designed to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the EU.</li><li>With MiCA the EU Commission has proposed bespoke regulation for utility tokens and stablecoins including payments tokens, asset-backed tokens and ‘significant’ stablecoins (including ‘global stablecoins’). As to investment and securities tokens, the EU Digital Finance Strategy relies on the existing body of EU financial and securities law, with the Prospectus Regulation, the MiFID framework as well as the UCITSD and AIFMD at its core, with the intention to incorporate necessary changes as part of the existing ongoing amendment and review processes.</li><li>MiCA provides for a bespoke prospectus regime for crypto-assets, with the issuing of e-money tokens (ie payment tokens), asset-referenced tokens (also known as stablecoins) and crypto-asset services being regulated activities subject to licensing. While supervision of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) will rest with national authorities, supervision of significant asset-referenced and e-money tokens will rest mainly with the European Banking Authority.</li><li>The EU Digital Finance Strategy marks a very important step for the EU in promoting innovation and developing the Single Market. At the same time, while MiCA is an ambitious legislative project, there is room for improvement. First, the scope of MiCA remains uncertain as the draft MiCA does not clearly delineate between usage tokens subject to MiCA and investment tokens subject to EU securities law. Second, a systematic approach to EU law is absent. Thresholds and concepts known from other EU laws should be firmly embedded in MiCA. Third, a framework for supervisory cooperation with regard to truly global stablecoins is missing.</li></ul></div></span>","PeriodicalId":43720,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets Law Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA) and the EU digital finance strategy\",\"authors\":\"Zetzsche D, Annunziata F, Arner D, et al.\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cmlj/kmab005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><div><div>Key points</div><ul><li>The European Commission published its new Digital Finance Strategy on 24 September 2020. One of the centrepieces of the Strategy is the draft Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA), designed to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the EU.</li><li>With MiCA the EU Commission has proposed bespoke regulation for utility tokens and stablecoins including payments tokens, asset-backed tokens and ‘significant’ stablecoins (including ‘global stablecoins’). As to investment and securities tokens, the EU Digital Finance Strategy relies on the existing body of EU financial and securities law, with the Prospectus Regulation, the MiFID framework as well as the UCITSD and AIFMD at its core, with the intention to incorporate necessary changes as part of the existing ongoing amendment and review processes.</li><li>MiCA provides for a bespoke prospectus regime for crypto-assets, with the issuing of e-money tokens (ie payment tokens), asset-referenced tokens (also known as stablecoins) and crypto-asset services being regulated activities subject to licensing. While supervision of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) will rest with national authorities, supervision of significant asset-referenced and e-money tokens will rest mainly with the European Banking Authority.</li><li>The EU Digital Finance Strategy marks a very important step for the EU in promoting innovation and developing the Single Market. At the same time, while MiCA is an ambitious legislative project, there is room for improvement. First, the scope of MiCA remains uncertain as the draft MiCA does not clearly delineate between usage tokens subject to MiCA and investment tokens subject to EU securities law. Second, a systematic approach to EU law is absent. Thresholds and concepts known from other EU laws should be firmly embedded in MiCA. Third, a framework for supervisory cooperation with regard to truly global stablecoins is missing.</li></ul></div></span>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capital Markets Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capital Markets Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmab005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmab005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟委员会于2020年9月24日发布了新的数字金融战略。该战略的核心之一是加密资产市场监管草案(MiCA),旨在为欧盟的数字资产提供全面的监管框架。通过MiCA,欧盟委员会提出了针对公用事业代币和稳定币的定制监管,包括支付代币、资产支持代币和“重要”稳定币(包括“全球稳定币”)。至于投资和证券代币,欧盟数字金融战略依赖于现有的欧盟金融和证券法,以《招股说明书条例》、MiFID框架以及UCITSD和AIFMD为核心,目的是将必要的变化纳入现有的正在进行的修订和审查过程的一部分。MiCA为加密资产提供了一个定制的招股说明书制度,发行电子货币代币(即支付代币)、资产参考代币(也称为稳定币)和加密资产服务是受监管的活动,需要获得许可。虽然对加密资产服务提供商(casp)的监管将由国家当局负责,但对重要资产参考和电子货币代币的监管将主要由欧洲银行管理局负责。欧盟数字金融战略是欧盟在推动创新和发展单一市场方面迈出的重要一步。与此同时,尽管MiCA是一个雄心勃勃的立法项目,但仍有改进的余地。首先,MiCA的范围仍然不确定,因为MiCA草案没有明确划分受MiCA约束的使用代币和受欧盟证券法约束的投资代币。其次,缺乏对欧盟法律的系统研究。从其他欧盟法律中了解到的门槛和概念应该牢固地嵌入到MiCA中。第三,缺乏关于真正的全球稳定币的监管合作框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA) and the EU digital finance strategy
Key points
  • The European Commission published its new Digital Finance Strategy on 24 September 2020. One of the centrepieces of the Strategy is the draft Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA), designed to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the EU.
  • With MiCA the EU Commission has proposed bespoke regulation for utility tokens and stablecoins including payments tokens, asset-backed tokens and ‘significant’ stablecoins (including ‘global stablecoins’). As to investment and securities tokens, the EU Digital Finance Strategy relies on the existing body of EU financial and securities law, with the Prospectus Regulation, the MiFID framework as well as the UCITSD and AIFMD at its core, with the intention to incorporate necessary changes as part of the existing ongoing amendment and review processes.
  • MiCA provides for a bespoke prospectus regime for crypto-assets, with the issuing of e-money tokens (ie payment tokens), asset-referenced tokens (also known as stablecoins) and crypto-asset services being regulated activities subject to licensing. While supervision of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) will rest with national authorities, supervision of significant asset-referenced and e-money tokens will rest mainly with the European Banking Authority.
  • The EU Digital Finance Strategy marks a very important step for the EU in promoting innovation and developing the Single Market. At the same time, while MiCA is an ambitious legislative project, there is room for improvement. First, the scope of MiCA remains uncertain as the draft MiCA does not clearly delineate between usage tokens subject to MiCA and investment tokens subject to EU securities law. Second, a systematic approach to EU law is absent. Thresholds and concepts known from other EU laws should be firmly embedded in MiCA. Third, a framework for supervisory cooperation with regard to truly global stablecoins is missing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: This journal is essential for all serious capital markets practitioners and for academics with an interest in this growing field around the World. It is the first periodical to focus entirely on aspects related to capital markets for lawyers and covers all of the fields within this practice area: Debt; Derivatives; Equity; High Yield Products; Securitisation; and Repackaging. With an international perspective, each issue covers articles and news relevant to the financial centres in the US, Europe and Asia. The journal provides a mix of thoughtful and in-depth consideration of the law and practice of capital markets through analytical articles on topical issues written by leading practitioners and academics in the international arena. There are also articles on matters of best practice and opinion on legal and practice developments from around the world. In particular the journal offers: • Unique specialist coverage of international capital markets practice • High level of analysis for experienced lawyers and academics • Team of internationally respected editors from leading centres in the US, Europe and Asia • Quality of articles assured through peer review system.
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): payments’ final frontier? Can GDP-linked debt be the answer to sovereign debt crises? Auditors report and the German Capital Markets Model Case Act (KapMuG)—legal consequences for EY in the Wirecard scandal Editors’ Note Do we really need a ‘perfectly reasonable investor’ within MAR?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1