在比特币区块链上检测CoinJoin交易的启发式方法

Hugo Schnoering, Michalis Vazirgiannis
{"title":"在比特币区块链上检测CoinJoin交易的启发式方法","authors":"Hugo Schnoering, Michalis Vazirgiannis","doi":"arxiv-2311.12491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research delves into the intricacies of Bitcoin, a decentralized\npeer-to-peer network, and its associated blockchain, which records all\ntransactions since its inception. While this ensures integrity and\ntransparency, the transparent nature of Bitcoin potentially compromises users'\nprivacy rights. To address this concern, users have adopted CoinJoin, a method\nthat amalgamates multiple transaction intents into a single, larger transaction\nto bolster transactional privacy. This process complicates individual\ntransaction tracing and disrupts many established blockchain analysis\nheuristics. Despite its significance, limited research has been conducted on\nidentifying CoinJoin transactions. Particularly noteworthy are varied CoinJoin\nimplementations such as JoinMarket, Wasabi, and Whirlpool, each presenting\ndistinct challenges due to their unique transaction structures. This study\ndelves deeply into the open-source implementations of these protocols, aiming\nto develop refined heuristics for identifying their transactions on the\nblockchain. Our exhaustive analysis covers transactions up to block 760,000,\noffering a comprehensive insight into CoinJoin transactions and their\nimplications for Bitcoin blockchain analysis.","PeriodicalId":501372,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heuristics for Detecting CoinJoin Transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Schnoering, Michalis Vazirgiannis\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2311.12491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research delves into the intricacies of Bitcoin, a decentralized\\npeer-to-peer network, and its associated blockchain, which records all\\ntransactions since its inception. While this ensures integrity and\\ntransparency, the transparent nature of Bitcoin potentially compromises users'\\nprivacy rights. To address this concern, users have adopted CoinJoin, a method\\nthat amalgamates multiple transaction intents into a single, larger transaction\\nto bolster transactional privacy. This process complicates individual\\ntransaction tracing and disrupts many established blockchain analysis\\nheuristics. Despite its significance, limited research has been conducted on\\nidentifying CoinJoin transactions. Particularly noteworthy are varied CoinJoin\\nimplementations such as JoinMarket, Wasabi, and Whirlpool, each presenting\\ndistinct challenges due to their unique transaction structures. This study\\ndelves deeply into the open-source implementations of these protocols, aiming\\nto develop refined heuristics for identifying their transactions on the\\nblockchain. Our exhaustive analysis covers transactions up to block 760,000,\\noffering a comprehensive insight into CoinJoin transactions and their\\nimplications for Bitcoin blockchain analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.12491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - General Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2311.12491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究深入研究了比特币的复杂性,这是一个分散的点对点网络,以及它相关的区块链,它记录了自成立以来的所有交易。虽然这确保了完整性和透明度,但比特币的透明性可能会损害用户的隐私权。为了解决这个问题,用户采用了CoinJoin,这是一种将多个交易意图合并到一个更大的交易中以增强交易隐私的方法。这个过程使个人交易跟踪变得复杂,并破坏了许多已建立的区块链分析启发式方法。尽管它很重要,但在识别CoinJoin交易方面进行的研究有限。特别值得注意的是各种各样的coinjoinimplementation,如JoinMarket、Wasabi和Whirlpool,由于它们独特的交易结构,每个都呈现出不同的挑战。本研究深入研究了这些协议的开源实现,旨在开发精细的启发式方法来识别区块链上的交易。我们的详尽分析涵盖了高达76万笔的交易,为CoinJoin交易及其对比特币区块链分析的影响提供了全面的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heuristics for Detecting CoinJoin Transactions on the Bitcoin Blockchain
This research delves into the intricacies of Bitcoin, a decentralized peer-to-peer network, and its associated blockchain, which records all transactions since its inception. While this ensures integrity and transparency, the transparent nature of Bitcoin potentially compromises users' privacy rights. To address this concern, users have adopted CoinJoin, a method that amalgamates multiple transaction intents into a single, larger transaction to bolster transactional privacy. This process complicates individual transaction tracing and disrupts many established blockchain analysis heuristics. Despite its significance, limited research has been conducted on identifying CoinJoin transactions. Particularly noteworthy are varied CoinJoin implementations such as JoinMarket, Wasabi, and Whirlpool, each presenting distinct challenges due to their unique transaction structures. This study delves deeply into the open-source implementations of these protocols, aiming to develop refined heuristics for identifying their transactions on the blockchain. Our exhaustive analysis covers transactions up to block 760,000, offering a comprehensive insight into CoinJoin transactions and their implications for Bitcoin blockchain analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Asymmetry Index: The View of Market Analysts Market Failures of Carbon Trading Hydrogen Development in China and the EU: A Recommended Tian Ji's Horse Racing Strategy Applying the Nash Bargaining Solution for a Reasonable Royalty II Auction theory and demography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1