不同债券数据集的收益率曲线

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Review of Derivatives Research Pub Date : 2019-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s11147-019-09162-z
Antonio Díaz, Francisco Jareño, Eliseo Navarro
{"title":"不同债券数据集的收益率曲线","authors":"Antonio Díaz, Francisco Jareño, Eliseo Navarro","doi":"10.1007/s11147-019-09162-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that zero coupon rates are not observable variables. Their estimation process may be cumbersome and time consuming. We explore the extent to which the set of security prices used in the yield curve construction of three popular interest rate datasets (from the Federal Reserve Board, the US Department of the Treasury, and Bloomberg) may determine the results of different analyses. Using the same US Treasury prices from GovPX and applying the same fitting technique, we estimate zero coupon rates using different baskets of assets, i.e., including/excluding bills, on-the-run, and off-the-run bonds, attempting to mimic those used by each data providers. To illustrate the uncertainty surrounding these alternatives representations of the underlying yield curve, we examine common uses of these data sets in pricing, risk management and macroeconomic purposes. We find significant and sometime overwhelming differences in the volatility term structure, the pricing of interest rate derivatives, and the correlations among different forward rates particularly in both ends of the yield curve. Relevant implications are also observed on a classic test of the expectations hypothesis. The simplest asset basket, which only includes the on-the-run bills and bonds, is probably the one with the best results.","PeriodicalId":45022,"journal":{"name":"Review of Derivatives Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yield curves from different bond data sets\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Díaz, Francisco Jareño, Eliseo Navarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11147-019-09162-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that zero coupon rates are not observable variables. Their estimation process may be cumbersome and time consuming. We explore the extent to which the set of security prices used in the yield curve construction of three popular interest rate datasets (from the Federal Reserve Board, the US Department of the Treasury, and Bloomberg) may determine the results of different analyses. Using the same US Treasury prices from GovPX and applying the same fitting technique, we estimate zero coupon rates using different baskets of assets, i.e., including/excluding bills, on-the-run, and off-the-run bonds, attempting to mimic those used by each data providers. To illustrate the uncertainty surrounding these alternatives representations of the underlying yield curve, we examine common uses of these data sets in pricing, risk management and macroeconomic purposes. We find significant and sometime overwhelming differences in the volatility term structure, the pricing of interest rate derivatives, and the correlations among different forward rates particularly in both ends of the yield curve. Relevant implications are also observed on a classic test of the expectations hypothesis. The simplest asset basket, which only includes the on-the-run bills and bonds, is probably the one with the best results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Derivatives Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Derivatives Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-019-09162-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Derivatives Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-019-09162-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

众所周知,零息利率是不可观察的变量。他们的评估过程可能是繁琐和耗时的。我们探讨了在三种流行的利率数据集(来自美联储委员会、美国财政部和彭博社)的收益率曲线构建中使用的一组证券价格在多大程度上可能决定不同分析的结果。使用来自GovPX的相同的美国国债价格,并应用相同的拟合技术,我们使用不同的资产篮子来估计零票面利率,即,包括/不包括票据、流通中的和未流通的债券,试图模仿每个数据提供商使用的那些。为了说明围绕潜在收益率曲线的这些替代表示的不确定性,我们研究了这些数据集在定价、风险管理和宏观经济目的中的常见用途。我们发现,在波动性期限结构、利率衍生品的定价以及不同远期利率之间的相关性,特别是在收益率曲线的两端,存在显著的、有时是压倒性的差异。在期望假设的经典检验中也观察到相关的含义。最简单的资产篮子,只包括流通中的票据和债券,可能是最好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Yield curves from different bond data sets
It is well known that zero coupon rates are not observable variables. Their estimation process may be cumbersome and time consuming. We explore the extent to which the set of security prices used in the yield curve construction of three popular interest rate datasets (from the Federal Reserve Board, the US Department of the Treasury, and Bloomberg) may determine the results of different analyses. Using the same US Treasury prices from GovPX and applying the same fitting technique, we estimate zero coupon rates using different baskets of assets, i.e., including/excluding bills, on-the-run, and off-the-run bonds, attempting to mimic those used by each data providers. To illustrate the uncertainty surrounding these alternatives representations of the underlying yield curve, we examine common uses of these data sets in pricing, risk management and macroeconomic purposes. We find significant and sometime overwhelming differences in the volatility term structure, the pricing of interest rate derivatives, and the correlations among different forward rates particularly in both ends of the yield curve. Relevant implications are also observed on a classic test of the expectations hypothesis. The simplest asset basket, which only includes the on-the-run bills and bonds, is probably the one with the best results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The proliferation of derivative assets during the past two decades is unprecedented. With this growth in derivatives comes the need for financial institutions, institutional investors, and corporations to use sophisticated quantitative techniques to take full advantage of the spectrum of these new financial instruments. Academic research has significantly contributed to our understanding of derivative assets and markets. The growth of derivative asset markets has been accompanied by a commensurate growth in the volume of scientific research. The Review of Derivatives Research provides an international forum for researchers involved in the general areas of derivative assets. The Review publishes high-quality articles dealing with the pricing and hedging of derivative assets on any underlying asset (commodity, interest rate, currency, equity, real estate, traded or non-traded, etc.). Specific topics include but are not limited to: econometric analyses of derivative markets (efficiency, anomalies, performance, etc.) analysis of swap markets market microstructure and volatility issues regulatory and taxation issues credit risk new areas of applications such as corporate finance (capital budgeting, debt innovations), international trade (tariffs and quotas), banking and insurance (embedded options, asset-liability management) risk-sharing issues and the design of optimal derivative securities risk management, management and control valuation and analysis of the options embedded in capital projects valuation and hedging of exotic options new areas for further development (i.e. natural resources, environmental economics. The Review has a double-blind refereeing process. In contrast to the delays in the decision making and publication processes of many current journals, the Review will provide authors with an initial decision within nine weeks of receipt of the manuscript and a goal of publication within six months after acceptance. Finally, a section of the journal is available for rapid publication on `hot'' issues in the market, small technical pieces, and timely essays related to pending legislation and policy. Officially cited as: Rev Deriv Res
期刊最新文献
The interaction between equity-based compensation and debt in managerial risk choices An affine model for short rates when monetary policy is path dependent A two-factor structural model for valuing corporate securities Martingale defects in the volatility surface and bubble conditions in the underlying Pricing levered warrants under the CEV diffusion model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1