揭示创客教育者在目标设定互动中的异质专业代理愿景

Megan Goeke, David DeLiema
{"title":"揭示创客教育者在目标设定互动中的异质专业代理愿景","authors":"Megan Goeke, David DeLiema","doi":"10.1007/s11423-023-10317-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agency is a core pedagogical goal of the maker education movement. However, there are still many unknowns about how agency is identified in maker settings. To document maker educator professional visions of agency, we conducted video-cued interviews with eleven U.S-based maker educators using video clips of families making in a drop-in cardboard-focused museum makerspace. We found that heterogenous professional visions of agency are in use within the maker education field, falling across for distinct themes: agency as <i>open-endedness</i>, agency as <i>progressive development</i>, agency as <i>pursuing-own-ideas</i>, and agency as <i>authority</i>. Depending on which of these lenses was foregrounded during video-cued reflections, maker educators interpreted the same video-recorded moments as evidence for and against maker agency. Further, these competing visions held different underlying assumptions about power in makerspace interactions. This documentation of heterogeneity indicates the complexity of agency as a maker pedagogical goal, makes a case that researchers should adopt multiple perspectives when conducting video-based microgenetic analyses, and raises questions about how to grapple with and mitigate inequitable power dynamics in makerspaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":501584,"journal":{"name":"Educational Technology Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering maker educators’ heterogenous professional visions of agency within goal setting interactions\",\"authors\":\"Megan Goeke, David DeLiema\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11423-023-10317-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Agency is a core pedagogical goal of the maker education movement. However, there are still many unknowns about how agency is identified in maker settings. To document maker educator professional visions of agency, we conducted video-cued interviews with eleven U.S-based maker educators using video clips of families making in a drop-in cardboard-focused museum makerspace. We found that heterogenous professional visions of agency are in use within the maker education field, falling across for distinct themes: agency as <i>open-endedness</i>, agency as <i>progressive development</i>, agency as <i>pursuing-own-ideas</i>, and agency as <i>authority</i>. Depending on which of these lenses was foregrounded during video-cued reflections, maker educators interpreted the same video-recorded moments as evidence for and against maker agency. Further, these competing visions held different underlying assumptions about power in makerspace interactions. This documentation of heterogeneity indicates the complexity of agency as a maker pedagogical goal, makes a case that researchers should adopt multiple perspectives when conducting video-based microgenetic analyses, and raises questions about how to grapple with and mitigate inequitable power dynamics in makerspaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Technology Research and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Technology Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10317-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Technology Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10317-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代理是创客教育运动的核心教学目标。然而,关于如何在创客环境中识别代理仍然存在许多未知因素。为了记录创客教育者对机构的专业看法,我们对11位美国创客教育者进行了视频采访,使用了家庭在一个以纸板为中心的博物馆创客空间制作的视频剪辑。我们发现,在创客教育领域中,不同的代理专业愿景正在被使用,它们有不同的主题:作为开放性的代理,作为进步发展的代理,作为追求自己想法的代理,以及作为权威的代理。根据这些镜头在视频提示的反思中出现的前景,创客教育者将相同的视频记录时刻解释为支持或反对创客代理的证据。此外,这些相互竞争的愿景对创客空间互动中的权力有着不同的潜在假设。这篇关于异质性的文献表明了作为创客教学目标的代理的复杂性,提出了研究人员在进行基于视频的微遗传学分析时应该采用多种视角的案例,并提出了如何应对和减轻创客空间中不公平的权力动态的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncovering maker educators’ heterogenous professional visions of agency within goal setting interactions

Agency is a core pedagogical goal of the maker education movement. However, there are still many unknowns about how agency is identified in maker settings. To document maker educator professional visions of agency, we conducted video-cued interviews with eleven U.S-based maker educators using video clips of families making in a drop-in cardboard-focused museum makerspace. We found that heterogenous professional visions of agency are in use within the maker education field, falling across for distinct themes: agency as open-endedness, agency as progressive development, agency as pursuing-own-ideas, and agency as authority. Depending on which of these lenses was foregrounded during video-cued reflections, maker educators interpreted the same video-recorded moments as evidence for and against maker agency. Further, these competing visions held different underlying assumptions about power in makerspace interactions. This documentation of heterogeneity indicates the complexity of agency as a maker pedagogical goal, makes a case that researchers should adopt multiple perspectives when conducting video-based microgenetic analyses, and raises questions about how to grapple with and mitigate inequitable power dynamics in makerspaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of combining emphasis manipulation and simplifying conditions sequencing method in gaining expertise while utilizing whole task sequencing Education and technology: elements of a relevant, comprehensive, and cumulative research agenda Analyzing the impact of basic psychological needs on student academic performance: a comparison of post-pandemic interactive synchronous hyflex and pre-pandemic traditional face-to-face instruction Evidence-based development of an instrument for the assessment of teachers’ self-perceptions of their artificial intelligence competence DUDA: a digital didactic learning unit based on educational escape rooms and multisensory learning activities for primary school children during COVID-19 lockdown
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1