肾移植后危险患者检测的临床决策支持系统的评价

Roland Roller, Manuel Mayrdorfer, Wiebke Duettmann, Marcel G. Naik, Danilo Schmidt, Fabian Halleck, Patrik Hummel, Aljoscha Burchardt, Sebastian Möller, Peter Dabrock, Bilgin Osmanodja, Klemens Budde
{"title":"肾移植后危险患者检测的临床决策支持系统的评价","authors":"Roland Roller, Manuel Mayrdorfer, Wiebke Duettmann, Marcel G. Naik, Danilo Schmidt, Fabian Halleck, Patrik Hummel, Aljoscha Burchardt, Sebastian Möller, Peter Dabrock, Bilgin Osmanodja, Klemens Budde","doi":"10.1101/2022.05.12.22275019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient care after kidney transplantation requires integration of complex information to make informed decisions on risk constellations. Many machine learning models have been developed for detecting patient outcomes in the past years. However, performance metrics alone do not determine practical utility. Often, the actual performance of medical professionals on the given task is not known. We present a newly developed clinical decision support system (CDSS) for detection of patients at risk for rejection and death-censored graft failure. The CDSS is based on clinical routine data including 1516 kidney transplant recipients and more than 100 000 data points. Additionally, we conduct a reader study to compare the performance of the system to estimations of physicians at a nephrology department with and without the CDSS. Internal validation shows AUC-ROC scores of 0.83 for rejection, and 0.95 for graft failure. The reader study shows that although the predictions by physicians converge towards the suggestions made by the CDSS, performance in terms of AUC-ROC does not improve (0.6413 vs. 0.6314 for rejection; 0.8072 vs. 0.7778 for graft failure). Finally, the study shows that the CDSS detects partially different patients at risk compared to physicians without CDSS. This indicates that the combination of both, medical professionals and a CDSS might help detect more patients at risk for graft failure. However, the question of how to integrate such a system efficiently into clinical practice remains open.","PeriodicalId":501561,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Transplantation","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Roland Roller, Manuel Mayrdorfer, Wiebke Duettmann, Marcel G. Naik, Danilo Schmidt, Fabian Halleck, Patrik Hummel, Aljoscha Burchardt, Sebastian Möller, Peter Dabrock, Bilgin Osmanodja, Klemens Budde\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2022.05.12.22275019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patient care after kidney transplantation requires integration of complex information to make informed decisions on risk constellations. Many machine learning models have been developed for detecting patient outcomes in the past years. However, performance metrics alone do not determine practical utility. Often, the actual performance of medical professionals on the given task is not known. We present a newly developed clinical decision support system (CDSS) for detection of patients at risk for rejection and death-censored graft failure. The CDSS is based on clinical routine data including 1516 kidney transplant recipients and more than 100 000 data points. Additionally, we conduct a reader study to compare the performance of the system to estimations of physicians at a nephrology department with and without the CDSS. Internal validation shows AUC-ROC scores of 0.83 for rejection, and 0.95 for graft failure. The reader study shows that although the predictions by physicians converge towards the suggestions made by the CDSS, performance in terms of AUC-ROC does not improve (0.6413 vs. 0.6314 for rejection; 0.8072 vs. 0.7778 for graft failure). Finally, the study shows that the CDSS detects partially different patients at risk compared to physicians without CDSS. This indicates that the combination of both, medical professionals and a CDSS might help detect more patients at risk for graft failure. However, the question of how to integrate such a system efficiently into clinical practice remains open.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.12.22275019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.12.22275019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾移植后的患者护理需要整合复杂的信息,以便对风险星座做出明智的决定。在过去的几年里,已经开发了许多机器学习模型来检测患者的结果。然而,性能指标本身并不能决定实际效用。通常,医疗专业人员在给定任务中的实际表现是未知的。我们提出了一个新开发的临床决策支持系统(CDSS),用于检测有排斥和死亡审查移植失败风险的患者。CDSS基于临床常规数据,包括1516名肾移植受者和超过10万个数据点。此外,我们进行了一项读者研究,将该系统的性能与有CDSS和没有CDSS的肾脏病科医生的评估进行比较。内部验证显示,排斥反应的AUC-ROC评分为0.83,移植失败的AUC-ROC评分为0.95。读者研究表明,尽管医生的预测趋近于CDSS的建议,但AUC-ROC的表现并没有改善(0.6413比0.6314拒绝;0.8072 vs 0.7778移植失败)。最后,研究表明,与没有CDSS的医生相比,CDSS检测到部分不同的风险患者。这表明,医学专业人员和CDSS的结合可能有助于发现更多有移植失败风险的患者。然而,如何将这样一个系统有效地融入临床实践的问题仍然是开放的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation
Patient care after kidney transplantation requires integration of complex information to make informed decisions on risk constellations. Many machine learning models have been developed for detecting patient outcomes in the past years. However, performance metrics alone do not determine practical utility. Often, the actual performance of medical professionals on the given task is not known. We present a newly developed clinical decision support system (CDSS) for detection of patients at risk for rejection and death-censored graft failure. The CDSS is based on clinical routine data including 1516 kidney transplant recipients and more than 100 000 data points. Additionally, we conduct a reader study to compare the performance of the system to estimations of physicians at a nephrology department with and without the CDSS. Internal validation shows AUC-ROC scores of 0.83 for rejection, and 0.95 for graft failure. The reader study shows that although the predictions by physicians converge towards the suggestions made by the CDSS, performance in terms of AUC-ROC does not improve (0.6413 vs. 0.6314 for rejection; 0.8072 vs. 0.7778 for graft failure). Finally, the study shows that the CDSS detects partially different patients at risk compared to physicians without CDSS. This indicates that the combination of both, medical professionals and a CDSS might help detect more patients at risk for graft failure. However, the question of how to integrate such a system efficiently into clinical practice remains open.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Access to Allogeneic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Search Prognosis: An Interventional Trial Donor HLA class 1 evolutionary divergence and late allograft rejection after liver transplantation in children: an emulated target trial. Improving Deceased Donor Kidney Utilization: Predicting Risk of Nonuse with Interpretable Models Improvements in Patient-Reported Functioning after Lung Transplant is Associated with Improved Quality of Life and Survival Influence of Information Access on Organ Donation: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1