Bartosz Maćkiewicz, Jan Wodowski, Joanna Andrusiewicz
{"title":"为什么人们在 VR 中似乎比在问卷调查中更加功利？","authors":"Bartosz Maćkiewicz, Jan Wodowski, Joanna Andrusiewicz","doi":"10.1080/09515089.2023.2282060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several experimental studies on moral judgment and moral decision-making show that in virtual reality people tend to make more “characteristically utilitarian” decisions than when responding to sta...","PeriodicalId":47485,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Psychology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do people seem to be more utilitarian in VR than in questionnaires?\",\"authors\":\"Bartosz Maćkiewicz, Jan Wodowski, Joanna Andrusiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09515089.2023.2282060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several experimental studies on moral judgment and moral decision-making show that in virtual reality people tend to make more “characteristically utilitarian” decisions than when responding to sta...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2282060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2282060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why do people seem to be more utilitarian in VR than in questionnaires?
Several experimental studies on moral judgment and moral decision-making show that in virtual reality people tend to make more “characteristically utilitarian” decisions than when responding to sta...
期刊介绍：
Philosophical Psychology is an international journal devoted to developing and strengthening the links between philosophy and the psychological sciences, both as basic sciences and as employed in applied settings, by publishing original, peer-refereed contributions to this expanding field of study and research. Published articles deal with issues that arise in the cognitive and brain sciences, and in areas of applied psychology.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
