William C. Buettner, Tyler A. Beeton, Courtney A. Schultz, Michael D. Caggiano, Michelle S. Greiner
{"title":"利用 POD 整合火灾和燃料规划","authors":"William C. Buettner, Tyler A. Beeton, Courtney A. Schultz, Michael D. Caggiano, Michelle S. Greiner","doi":"10.1071/wf23022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Background</strong><p>Potential Wildfire Operational Delineations (PODs) were developed as a pre-season planning tool to promote safe and effective fire response. Past research on PODs has identified uses in an incident management context. There has been little research on how PODs are being utilised in non-incident management contexts to align forest and wildfire planning objectives.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>We sought to understand how actors are adopting and adapting the PODs framework to inform non-incident management, and to identify facilitators, barriers and recommendations.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>We investigated three cases, the San Juan National Forest, the San Isabel National Forest and the Washington Department of Natural Resources, through 13 semi-structured, key informant interviews.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>We found that PODs were helpful for validating fuels treatment plans and supporting communication among agency staff, and with private landowners and collaborators. Challenges included lack of technical knowledge and skills, unclear leadership direction, potential misalignment with other forest management goals and community and agency buy-in to using PODs.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>We offer insights into how PODs are being utilised within our case studies and align these findings with diffusion of innovation literature.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>This preliminary research is important given increased funding for PODs in recent legislation and the possibility of broader adoption for fuels treatment planning in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":14464,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","volume":"539 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using PODs to integrate fire and fuels planning\",\"authors\":\"William C. Buettner, Tyler A. Beeton, Courtney A. Schultz, Michael D. Caggiano, Michelle S. Greiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/wf23022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Background</strong><p>Potential Wildfire Operational Delineations (PODs) were developed as a pre-season planning tool to promote safe and effective fire response. Past research on PODs has identified uses in an incident management context. There has been little research on how PODs are being utilised in non-incident management contexts to align forest and wildfire planning objectives.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>We sought to understand how actors are adopting and adapting the PODs framework to inform non-incident management, and to identify facilitators, barriers and recommendations.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>We investigated three cases, the San Juan National Forest, the San Isabel National Forest and the Washington Department of Natural Resources, through 13 semi-structured, key informant interviews.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>We found that PODs were helpful for validating fuels treatment plans and supporting communication among agency staff, and with private landowners and collaborators. Challenges included lack of technical knowledge and skills, unclear leadership direction, potential misalignment with other forest management goals and community and agency buy-in to using PODs.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>We offer insights into how PODs are being utilised within our case studies and align these findings with diffusion of innovation literature.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>This preliminary research is important given increased funding for PODs in recent legislation and the possibility of broader adoption for fuels treatment planning in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Wildland Fire\",\"volume\":\"539 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Wildland Fire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/wf23022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/wf23022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景野外潜在火灾行动划界(POD)是作为一种季节前规划工具而开发的,旨在促进安全有效的火灾响应。过去关于 POD 的研究已经确定了在事故管理背景下的用途。关于如何在非事故管理背景下利用 POD 来调整森林和野火规划目标的研究则很少。目的我们试图了解参与者如何采用和调整 PODs 框架,为非事件管理提供信息,并确定促进因素、障碍和建议。方法我们对圣胡安国家森林、圣伊莎贝尔国家森林和华盛顿自然资源部这三个案例进行了调查,共进行了 13 次半结构化关键信息访谈。主要结果我们发现,POD 对于验证燃料处理计划、支持机构工作人员之间以及与私人土地所有者和合作者之间的沟通很有帮助。面临的挑战包括缺乏技术知识和技能、领导方向不明确、可能与其他森林管理目标不一致以及社区和机构对使用 POD 的支持。结论我们对案例研究中如何利用 POD 提出了见解,并将这些发现与创新传播文献进行了比对。启示鉴于最近的立法增加了对 POD 的资助,而且未来有可能在燃料处理规划中更广泛地采用 POD,因此这项初步研究非常重要。
Potential Wildfire Operational Delineations (PODs) were developed as a pre-season planning tool to promote safe and effective fire response. Past research on PODs has identified uses in an incident management context. There has been little research on how PODs are being utilised in non-incident management contexts to align forest and wildfire planning objectives.
Aims
We sought to understand how actors are adopting and adapting the PODs framework to inform non-incident management, and to identify facilitators, barriers and recommendations.
Methods
We investigated three cases, the San Juan National Forest, the San Isabel National Forest and the Washington Department of Natural Resources, through 13 semi-structured, key informant interviews.
Key results
We found that PODs were helpful for validating fuels treatment plans and supporting communication among agency staff, and with private landowners and collaborators. Challenges included lack of technical knowledge and skills, unclear leadership direction, potential misalignment with other forest management goals and community and agency buy-in to using PODs.
Conclusions
We offer insights into how PODs are being utilised within our case studies and align these findings with diffusion of innovation literature.
Implications
This preliminary research is important given increased funding for PODs in recent legislation and the possibility of broader adoption for fuels treatment planning in the future.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Wildland Fire publishes new and significant articles that advance basic and applied research concerning wildland fire. Published papers aim to assist in the understanding of the basic principles of fire as a process, its ecological impact at the stand level and the landscape level, modelling fire and its effects, as well as presenting information on how to effectively and efficiently manage fire. The journal has an international perspective, since wildland fire plays a major social, economic and ecological role around the globe.
The International Journal of Wildland Fire is published on behalf of the International Association of Wildland Fire.