COVID-19 与中国人的心理健康:人格的影响

Xiao Zhang, Michele Battisti, Eugenio Proto
{"title":"COVID-19 与中国人的心理健康:人格的影响","authors":"Xiao Zhang, Michele Battisti, Eugenio Proto","doi":"10.1136/jech-2023-221077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background China was the first country affected by the COVID-19 virus, and it is a very important case to study the effects of the virus and the consequent restrictions. However, national representative studies of how the COVID-19 pandemic affects mental health in China are still limited. Methods Using two waves of the China Family Panel Studies, we follow the same individuals before and during the pandemic. We compare weighted means using 95% CIs to explore mental health deterioration, and we and perform several linear regressions with the Ordinaly Least Square (OLS) estimator to identify individuals most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Results The prevalence of severe cases of depression, measured using an eight-item version of the common Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), increased from 6.68% in 2018 to 7.86% in 2020; quantifiable as around a 18% increase. This deterioration is higher for individuals subject to strict lockdowns, about 0.4 symptoms more on average, and it is stronger among those who already reported symptoms of depression in the 2018 wave of data. Individuals with more open personalities tend to experience more severe deterioration: a 1 SD change in the openness trait corresponds to 0.05 more symptoms. On the other hand, more neurotic individuals seem less negatively affected. Conclusion We find clear evidence of a moderate level of mental health deterioration between 2018 and 2020. These effects are larger for individuals subject to stricter lockdowns and for individuals with more open personalities. Data are available on reasonable request. This paper uses data from China Family Panel Studies (wave 2018 and wave 2020), which are available to researchers on request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the (CFPS Data Platform) repository, (<http://www.isss.pku.edu.cn/cfps/download>). Please contact the China Family Panel Studies project team for data access. Their mailing address is Office of China Family Panel Studies, Science Building #5, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China; Postal Code:100871; email: isss.cfps@pku.edu.cn.The authors will make replication files (Stata do file) available.","PeriodicalId":15778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and mental health in China: the effects of personality\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Zhang, Michele Battisti, Eugenio Proto\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jech-2023-221077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background China was the first country affected by the COVID-19 virus, and it is a very important case to study the effects of the virus and the consequent restrictions. However, national representative studies of how the COVID-19 pandemic affects mental health in China are still limited. Methods Using two waves of the China Family Panel Studies, we follow the same individuals before and during the pandemic. We compare weighted means using 95% CIs to explore mental health deterioration, and we and perform several linear regressions with the Ordinaly Least Square (OLS) estimator to identify individuals most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Results The prevalence of severe cases of depression, measured using an eight-item version of the common Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), increased from 6.68% in 2018 to 7.86% in 2020; quantifiable as around a 18% increase. This deterioration is higher for individuals subject to strict lockdowns, about 0.4 symptoms more on average, and it is stronger among those who already reported symptoms of depression in the 2018 wave of data. Individuals with more open personalities tend to experience more severe deterioration: a 1 SD change in the openness trait corresponds to 0.05 more symptoms. On the other hand, more neurotic individuals seem less negatively affected. Conclusion We find clear evidence of a moderate level of mental health deterioration between 2018 and 2020. These effects are larger for individuals subject to stricter lockdowns and for individuals with more open personalities. Data are available on reasonable request. This paper uses data from China Family Panel Studies (wave 2018 and wave 2020), which are available to researchers on request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the (CFPS Data Platform) repository, (<http://www.isss.pku.edu.cn/cfps/download>). Please contact the China Family Panel Studies project team for data access. Their mailing address is Office of China Family Panel Studies, Science Building #5, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China; Postal Code:100871; email: isss.cfps@pku.edu.cn.The authors will make replication files (Stata do file) available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-221077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-221077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景 中国是第一个受到 COVID-19 病毒影响的国家,也是研究该病毒的影响和相应限制的重要案例。然而,关于 COVID-19 在中国的流行如何影响心理健康的国家代表性研究仍然有限。方法 我们利用中国家庭面板研究的两次波次,分别对大流行之前和期间的相同个体进行跟踪调查。我们使用 95% CI 比较了加权平均值,以探究心理健康状况的恶化,并使用正交最小二乘法(OLS)估计器进行了多次线性回归,以确定受 COVID-19 大流行影响最大的个体。结果 使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的八项目版本测量的严重抑郁症患病率从 2018 年的 6.68% 上升到 2020 年的 7.86%;可量化为约 18% 的增长。对于受到严格禁闭的人来说,这种恶化程度更高,平均多出约 0.4 个症状,而且在 2018 年的数据浪潮中已经报告了抑郁症状的人中,这种恶化程度更强。性格更开放的个体往往会经历更严重的恶化:开放特质每变化 1 SD,症状就会增加 0.05 个。另一方面,神经质较强的个体受到的负面影响似乎较小。结论 我们发现有明确的证据表明,在 2018 年至 2020 年期间,精神健康状况出现了中等程度的恶化。对于受到更严格限制的个人和性格更开放的个人来说,这些影响更大。如有合理要求,可提供数据。本文使用的数据来自中国家庭面板研究(2018 年波和 2020 年波),研究人员可索取这些数据。本研究中生成和/或分析的数据集可在(CFPS 数据平台)存储库()中获取。如需获取数据,请联系中国家庭调查项目组。邮寄地址:北京市海淀区颐和园路 5 号北京大学科学馆 5 号楼中国家庭面板研究办公室;邮政编码:100871;电子邮件:isss.cfps@pku.edu.cn.The 作者将提供复制文件(Stata do file)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 and mental health in China: the effects of personality
Background China was the first country affected by the COVID-19 virus, and it is a very important case to study the effects of the virus and the consequent restrictions. However, national representative studies of how the COVID-19 pandemic affects mental health in China are still limited. Methods Using two waves of the China Family Panel Studies, we follow the same individuals before and during the pandemic. We compare weighted means using 95% CIs to explore mental health deterioration, and we and perform several linear regressions with the Ordinaly Least Square (OLS) estimator to identify individuals most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Results The prevalence of severe cases of depression, measured using an eight-item version of the common Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), increased from 6.68% in 2018 to 7.86% in 2020; quantifiable as around a 18% increase. This deterioration is higher for individuals subject to strict lockdowns, about 0.4 symptoms more on average, and it is stronger among those who already reported symptoms of depression in the 2018 wave of data. Individuals with more open personalities tend to experience more severe deterioration: a 1 SD change in the openness trait corresponds to 0.05 more symptoms. On the other hand, more neurotic individuals seem less negatively affected. Conclusion We find clear evidence of a moderate level of mental health deterioration between 2018 and 2020. These effects are larger for individuals subject to stricter lockdowns and for individuals with more open personalities. Data are available on reasonable request. This paper uses data from China Family Panel Studies (wave 2018 and wave 2020), which are available to researchers on request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the (CFPS Data Platform) repository, (). Please contact the China Family Panel Studies project team for data access. Their mailing address is Office of China Family Panel Studies, Science Building #5, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China; Postal Code:100871; email: isss.cfps@pku.edu.cn.The authors will make replication files (Stata do file) available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early adulthood socioeconomic trajectories contribute to inequalities in adult diet quality, independent of childhood and adulthood socioeconomic position Education-related inequalities in disability during the last years of life: a full population register-based study Impact of increasing workforce racial diversity on black-white disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality Gender-specific aspects of socialisation and risk of cardiovascular disease among community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study using machine learning algorithms and a conventional method Poverty trajectories and child and mother well-being outcomes in Ireland: findings from an Irish prospective cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1