新兴数字技术传播中的流行病效应:人工智能应用的证据

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104917
Johannes Dahlke , Mathias Beck , Jan Kinne , David Lenz , Robert Dehghan , Martin Wörter , Bernd Ebersberger
{"title":"新兴数字技术传播中的流行病效应:人工智能应用的证据","authors":"Johannes Dahlke ,&nbsp;Mathias Beck ,&nbsp;Jan Kinne ,&nbsp;David Lenz ,&nbsp;Robert Dehghan ,&nbsp;Martin Wörter ,&nbsp;Bernd Ebersberger","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2023.104917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The properties of emerging, digital, general-purpose technologies make it hard to observe their adoption by firms and identify the salient determinants of adoption. However, these aspects are critical since the patterns related to early-stage diffusion establish path-dependencies which have implications for the distribution of the technological opportunities and socio-economic returns linked to these technologies. We focus on the case of artificial intelligence (AI) and train a transformer language model to identify firm-level AI adoption using textual data from over 1.1 million websites and constructing a hyperlink network that includes &gt;380,000 firms in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. We use these data to expand and test epidemic models of inter-firm technology diffusion by integrating the concepts of social capital and network embeddedness. We find that AI adoption is related to three epidemic effect mechanisms: 1) Indirect co-location in industrial and regional hot-spots associated to production of AI knowledge; 2) Direct exposure to sources transmitting deep AI knowledge; 3) Relational embeddedness in the AI knowledge network. The pattern of adoption identified is highly clustered and features a rather closed system of AI adopters which is likely to hinder its broader diffusion. This has implications for policy which should facilitate diffusion beyond localized clusters of expertise. Our findings also point to the need to employ a systemic perspective to investigate the relation between AI adoption and firm performance to identify whether appropriation of the benefits of AI depends on network position and social capital.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323002019/pdfft?md5=52bffc65e05868551d05578ceba1f5fd&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733323002019-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemic effects in the diffusion of emerging digital technologies: evidence from artificial intelligence adoption\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Dahlke ,&nbsp;Mathias Beck ,&nbsp;Jan Kinne ,&nbsp;David Lenz ,&nbsp;Robert Dehghan ,&nbsp;Martin Wörter ,&nbsp;Bernd Ebersberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2023.104917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The properties of emerging, digital, general-purpose technologies make it hard to observe their adoption by firms and identify the salient determinants of adoption. However, these aspects are critical since the patterns related to early-stage diffusion establish path-dependencies which have implications for the distribution of the technological opportunities and socio-economic returns linked to these technologies. We focus on the case of artificial intelligence (AI) and train a transformer language model to identify firm-level AI adoption using textual data from over 1.1 million websites and constructing a hyperlink network that includes &gt;380,000 firms in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. We use these data to expand and test epidemic models of inter-firm technology diffusion by integrating the concepts of social capital and network embeddedness. We find that AI adoption is related to three epidemic effect mechanisms: 1) Indirect co-location in industrial and regional hot-spots associated to production of AI knowledge; 2) Direct exposure to sources transmitting deep AI knowledge; 3) Relational embeddedness in the AI knowledge network. The pattern of adoption identified is highly clustered and features a rather closed system of AI adopters which is likely to hinder its broader diffusion. This has implications for policy which should facilitate diffusion beyond localized clusters of expertise. Our findings also point to the need to employ a systemic perspective to investigate the relation between AI adoption and firm performance to identify whether appropriation of the benefits of AI depends on network position and social capital.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323002019/pdfft?md5=52bffc65e05868551d05578ceba1f5fd&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733323002019-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323002019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733323002019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于新兴数字通用技术的特性,很难观察到企业采用这些技术的情况,也很难确定采用这些技术的突出决定因素。然而,这些方面至关重要,因为与早期阶段传播相关的模式建立了路径依赖,这对与这些技术相关的技术机会和社会经济回报的分配产生了影响。我们以人工智能(AI)为例,利用来自 110 多万个网站的文本数据,构建了一个包括德国、奥地利和瑞士 38 万家企业的超链接网络,训练了一个转换器语言模型,以识别企业层面的人工智能采用情况。通过整合社会资本和网络嵌入性的概念,我们利用这些数据扩展并测试了企业间技术扩散的流行模型。我们发现,人工智能的采用与三种流行病效应机制有关:1)与人工智能知识生产相关的工业和区域热点地区的间接同地办公;2)直接接触传播深层次人工智能知识的来源;3)人工智能知识网络中的关系嵌入。已确定的采用模式高度集群,其特点是人工智能采用者系统相当封闭,这可能会阻碍其更广泛的传播。这对政策也有影响,因为政策应促进传播,使其超越本地化的专业知识集群。我们的研究结果还表明,有必要从系统的角度来研究采用人工智能与公司业绩之间的关系,以确定人工智能效益的获取是否取决于网络地位和社会资本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epidemic effects in the diffusion of emerging digital technologies: evidence from artificial intelligence adoption

The properties of emerging, digital, general-purpose technologies make it hard to observe their adoption by firms and identify the salient determinants of adoption. However, these aspects are critical since the patterns related to early-stage diffusion establish path-dependencies which have implications for the distribution of the technological opportunities and socio-economic returns linked to these technologies. We focus on the case of artificial intelligence (AI) and train a transformer language model to identify firm-level AI adoption using textual data from over 1.1 million websites and constructing a hyperlink network that includes >380,000 firms in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. We use these data to expand and test epidemic models of inter-firm technology diffusion by integrating the concepts of social capital and network embeddedness. We find that AI adoption is related to three epidemic effect mechanisms: 1) Indirect co-location in industrial and regional hot-spots associated to production of AI knowledge; 2) Direct exposure to sources transmitting deep AI knowledge; 3) Relational embeddedness in the AI knowledge network. The pattern of adoption identified is highly clustered and features a rather closed system of AI adopters which is likely to hinder its broader diffusion. This has implications for policy which should facilitate diffusion beyond localized clusters of expertise. Our findings also point to the need to employ a systemic perspective to investigate the relation between AI adoption and firm performance to identify whether appropriation of the benefits of AI depends on network position and social capital.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Transformation of the governance of failure for radical innovation: The role of strategic leaders How media portrayal of CEO overconfidence impacts radical innovation The determinants of parallel invention: Measuring the role of information sharing and personal interaction between inventors Do the elite university projects promote scientific research competitiveness: Evidence from NSFC grants The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1