从蚜虫微生物组分析中得出生态和进化推论取决于方法和实验设计

Adrian Wolfgang, Ayco J. M. Tack, Gabriele Berg, Ahmed Abdelfattah
{"title":"从蚜虫微生物组分析中得出生态和进化推论取决于方法和实验设计","authors":"Adrian Wolfgang,&nbsp;Ayco J. M. Tack,&nbsp;Gabriele Berg,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdelfattah","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Aphids play an important role in agroecological contexts as pests and vectors of plant diseases. Aphid performance is closely connected to microbial endosymbionts that provide different benefits or costs to both the aphids and their hosts plants. Furthermore, the microbiome of aphids is connected to soil microbiomes via the plant. Aphid microbiome experiments usually include a pooling step, where several individuals are sequenced together to obtain sufficient DNA concentrations but pooling may blur intraspecific variations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the effects of sequencing single versus pooled aphids on the results of microbiome analyses, we compared 16S rRNA/ITS amplicon libraries from pooled and single oak aphids (<i>Tuberculatus annulatus</i> HARTIG) under three different soil treatments. We tested whether results quantitatively or qualitatively depend on pooling aphids, prevalence-based in silico filtering or removal of the primary endosymbiont (<i>Buchnera aphidicola</i>). <i>Buchnera</i> phylogeny, prevalence and abundance of secondary endosymbionts and effects of soil microbiota were investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pooling leads to quantitative differences in bacteria and qualitative differences in fungal species richness, bacterial community composition and partially fungal community composition. Filtering-dependent results were obtained for bacterial evenness. <i>Buchnera</i> phylogeny supports the hypothesis of cospeciation of primary endosymbionts in oak aphids. We detected <i>Arsenophonus</i>, <i>Hamiltonella</i>, <i>Rickettsia</i>, <i>Rickettsiella</i>, <i>Serratia</i> and <i>Sphingopyxis</i> in oak aphids, with their prevalence and abundance partially affected by pooling. Pooling leads to overestimating the frequency of multispecies endosymbiont infections, while underestimating their relative abundance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We hereby extend our view on non-model aphid microbiomes and identify pitfalls in experimental design in aphid microbiome research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological and evolutionary inferences from aphid microbiome analyses depend on methods and experimental design\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Wolfgang,&nbsp;Ayco J. M. Tack,&nbsp;Gabriele Berg,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdelfattah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sae2.12087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Aphids play an important role in agroecological contexts as pests and vectors of plant diseases. Aphid performance is closely connected to microbial endosymbionts that provide different benefits or costs to both the aphids and their hosts plants. Furthermore, the microbiome of aphids is connected to soil microbiomes via the plant. Aphid microbiome experiments usually include a pooling step, where several individuals are sequenced together to obtain sufficient DNA concentrations but pooling may blur intraspecific variations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the effects of sequencing single versus pooled aphids on the results of microbiome analyses, we compared 16S rRNA/ITS amplicon libraries from pooled and single oak aphids (<i>Tuberculatus annulatus</i> HARTIG) under three different soil treatments. We tested whether results quantitatively or qualitatively depend on pooling aphids, prevalence-based in silico filtering or removal of the primary endosymbiont (<i>Buchnera aphidicola</i>). <i>Buchnera</i> phylogeny, prevalence and abundance of secondary endosymbionts and effects of soil microbiota were investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pooling leads to quantitative differences in bacteria and qualitative differences in fungal species richness, bacterial community composition and partially fungal community composition. Filtering-dependent results were obtained for bacterial evenness. <i>Buchnera</i> phylogeny supports the hypothesis of cospeciation of primary endosymbionts in oak aphids. We detected <i>Arsenophonus</i>, <i>Hamiltonella</i>, <i>Rickettsia</i>, <i>Rickettsiella</i>, <i>Serratia</i> and <i>Sphingopyxis</i> in oak aphids, with their prevalence and abundance partially affected by pooling. Pooling leads to overestimating the frequency of multispecies endosymbiont infections, while underestimating their relative abundance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We hereby extend our view on non-model aphid microbiomes and identify pitfalls in experimental design in aphid microbiome research.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12087\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 作为害虫和植物病害的传播媒介,蚜虫在农业生态环境中发挥着重要作用。蚜虫的表现与微生物内共生体密切相关,这些内共生体为蚜虫及其寄主植物提供不同的益处或成本。此外,蚜虫的微生物组通过植物与土壤微生物组相连。蚜虫微生物组实验通常包括一个汇集步骤,即几个个体一起测序以获得足够的 DNA 浓度,但汇集可能会模糊种内差异。 材料与方法 为了研究单个蚜虫测序与集合蚜虫测序对微生物组分析结果的影响,我们比较了三种不同土壤处理下集合栎蚜和单个栎蚜(Tuberculatus annulatus HARTIG)的 16S rRNA/ITS 扩增子文库。我们测试了结果的定量或定性是否取决于汇集蚜虫、基于流行率的硅学过滤或去除主要内共生体(Buchnera aphidicola)。研究了蚜虫系统发育、次生内共生体的流行率和丰度以及土壤微生物群的影响。 结果 汇集导致细菌数量上的差异以及真菌物种丰富度、细菌群落组成和部分真菌群落组成的质量差异。细菌均匀度的结果与过滤有关。Buchnera 系统发育支持橡树蚜主要内生菌共生的假说。我们在橡树蚜虫中检测到了阿森菌、哈密尔顿菌、立克次体、立克次氏体、沙雷氏菌和鞘翅目蚜虫,它们的流行率和丰度部分受到了汇集的影响。汇集会导致高估多物种内共生体感染的频率,同时低估其相对丰度。 结论 我们在此扩展了我们对非模式蚜虫微生物组的看法,并指出了蚜虫微生物组研究中实验设计的误区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecological and evolutionary inferences from aphid microbiome analyses depend on methods and experimental design

Introduction

Aphids play an important role in agroecological contexts as pests and vectors of plant diseases. Aphid performance is closely connected to microbial endosymbionts that provide different benefits or costs to both the aphids and their hosts plants. Furthermore, the microbiome of aphids is connected to soil microbiomes via the plant. Aphid microbiome experiments usually include a pooling step, where several individuals are sequenced together to obtain sufficient DNA concentrations but pooling may blur intraspecific variations.

Materials and Methods

To investigate the effects of sequencing single versus pooled aphids on the results of microbiome analyses, we compared 16S rRNA/ITS amplicon libraries from pooled and single oak aphids (Tuberculatus annulatus HARTIG) under three different soil treatments. We tested whether results quantitatively or qualitatively depend on pooling aphids, prevalence-based in silico filtering or removal of the primary endosymbiont (Buchnera aphidicola). Buchnera phylogeny, prevalence and abundance of secondary endosymbionts and effects of soil microbiota were investigated.

Results

Pooling leads to quantitative differences in bacteria and qualitative differences in fungal species richness, bacterial community composition and partially fungal community composition. Filtering-dependent results were obtained for bacterial evenness. Buchnera phylogeny supports the hypothesis of cospeciation of primary endosymbionts in oak aphids. We detected Arsenophonus, Hamiltonella, Rickettsia, Rickettsiella, Serratia and Sphingopyxis in oak aphids, with their prevalence and abundance partially affected by pooling. Pooling leads to overestimating the frequency of multispecies endosymbiont infections, while underestimating their relative abundance.

Conclusion

We hereby extend our view on non-model aphid microbiomes and identify pitfalls in experimental design in aphid microbiome research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Influence of climate on soil viral communities in Australia on a regional scale Biodegradable plastic film mulch increases the mineralisation of organic amendments and prevents nitrate leaching during the growing season in organic vegetable production Pretreatment and fermentation of lignocellulose from oil palm fronds as a potential source of fibre for ruminant feed: a review Psyllium husk mucilage as a novel seed encapsulant for agriculture and reforestation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1