{"title":"首席执行官的资本利得税负债与会计保守主义","authors":"Gunratan Lonare","doi":"10.1111/jbfa.12770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent studies show that the tax-induced lock-in effect discourages CEOs from unwinding their unrestricted equity and subsequently exacerbates their risk-aversion. I investigate how CEOs’ unrealized capital gains tax liabilities (tax burdens) influence financial reporting conservatism. I find that the demand for accounting conservatism decreases with CEO tax burdens. Further analyses show that the negative relation between CEO tax burden and conservatism is stronger when the firm has high leverage and high default risk and when the CEO's incentives are more aligned with equity holders. This highlights the shareholder–creditor agency conflicts mitigation role of CEO tax burdens in reducing creditors’ demand for conservatism. I exploit the Federal Taxpayer Reform Act of 1997 and staggered state-level tax cuts that significantly decreased personal capital gains tax rates as identification strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","volume":"51 7-8","pages":"1943-1979"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CEOs’ capital gains tax liabilities and accounting conservatism\",\"authors\":\"Gunratan Lonare\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbfa.12770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent studies show that the tax-induced lock-in effect discourages CEOs from unwinding their unrestricted equity and subsequently exacerbates their risk-aversion. I investigate how CEOs’ unrealized capital gains tax liabilities (tax burdens) influence financial reporting conservatism. I find that the demand for accounting conservatism decreases with CEO tax burdens. Further analyses show that the negative relation between CEO tax burden and conservatism is stronger when the firm has high leverage and high default risk and when the CEO's incentives are more aligned with equity holders. This highlights the shareholder–creditor agency conflicts mitigation role of CEO tax burdens in reducing creditors’ demand for conservatism. I exploit the Federal Taxpayer Reform Act of 1997 and staggered state-level tax cuts that significantly decreased personal capital gains tax rates as identification strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting\",\"volume\":\"51 7-8\",\"pages\":\"1943-1979\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12770\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbfa.12770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近的研究表明,税收导致的锁定效应会阻碍首席执行官解除其未受限股权,进而加剧其风险规避行为。我研究了首席执行官的未实现资本利得税负(税收负担)如何影响财务报告保守主义。我发现,对会计保守主义的需求会随着首席执行官税务负担的增加而减少。进一步的分析表明,当公司具有高杠杆率和高违约风险时,以及当首席执行官的激励机制与股权持有人更加一致时,首席执行官税负与保守主义之间的负相关关系会更强。这凸显了首席执行官税负在减少债权人对保守主义的需求方面所起的股东-债权人代理冲突缓解作用。我利用《1997 年联邦纳税人改革法案》(Federal Taxpayer Reform Act of 1997)和州一级的交错减税政策(这些政策大幅降低了个人资本利得税税率)作为识别策略。
CEOs’ capital gains tax liabilities and accounting conservatism
Recent studies show that the tax-induced lock-in effect discourages CEOs from unwinding their unrestricted equity and subsequently exacerbates their risk-aversion. I investigate how CEOs’ unrealized capital gains tax liabilities (tax burdens) influence financial reporting conservatism. I find that the demand for accounting conservatism decreases with CEO tax burdens. Further analyses show that the negative relation between CEO tax burden and conservatism is stronger when the firm has high leverage and high default risk and when the CEO's incentives are more aligned with equity holders. This highlights the shareholder–creditor agency conflicts mitigation role of CEO tax burdens in reducing creditors’ demand for conservatism. I exploit the Federal Taxpayer Reform Act of 1997 and staggered state-level tax cuts that significantly decreased personal capital gains tax rates as identification strategies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting exists to publish high quality research papers in accounting, corporate finance, corporate governance and their interfaces. The interfaces are relevant in many areas such as financial reporting and communication, valuation, financial performance measurement and managerial reward and control structures. A feature of JBFA is that it recognises that informational problems are pervasive in financial markets and business organisations, and that accounting plays an important role in resolving such problems. JBFA welcomes both theoretical and empirical contributions. Nonetheless, theoretical papers should yield novel testable implications, and empirical papers should be theoretically well-motivated. The Editors view accounting and finance as being closely related to economics and, as a consequence, papers submitted will often have theoretical motivations that are grounded in economics. JBFA, however, also seeks papers that complement economics-based theorising with theoretical developments originating in other social science disciplines or traditions. While many papers in JBFA use econometric or related empirical methods, the Editors also welcome contributions that use other empirical research methods. Although the scope of JBFA is broad, it is not a suitable outlet for highly abstract mathematical papers, or empirical papers with inadequate theoretical motivation. Also, papers that study asset pricing, or the operations of financial markets, should have direct implications for one or more of preparers, regulators, users of financial statements, and corporate financial decision makers, or at least should have implications for the development of future research relevant to such users.