我在 L2 写作中需要反馈还是回避反馈?自我效能感和害羞对寻求反馈行为的影响

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100805
Jian Xu , Yabing Wang
{"title":"我在 L2 写作中需要反馈还是回避反馈?自我效能感和害羞对寻求反馈行为的影响","authors":"Jian Xu ,&nbsp;Yabing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whether second or foreign (L2) writing self-efficacy predicts feedback-seeking behavior (FSB) positively or negatively remains unresolved. Moreover, empirical research regarding the influence of shyness on FSB is lacking. The investigation of self-efficacy, shyness, and FSB addresses how efficacious and shy individuals seek feedback and provides implications for overcoming shyness and recognizing the need to seek feedback for academic growth. Thus, the aim of the present study is to explore the impact of L2 writing self-efficacy and shyness on FSB. A battery of questionnaires was administered to 606 Chinese participants and six L2 learners’ writing experiences were elicited in relation to the three concepts. The quantitative results revealed that linguistic self-efficacy negatively impacted feedback inquiry, whereas performance self-efficacy positively impacted it. Further, self-regulatory self-efficacy had a positive impact on both feedback monitoring and inquiry. Shyness had a positive impact on feedback monitoring. Interviews revealed that L2 learners were confident about grammar and vocabulary in writing, but they struggled with organization, self-monitored feedback to avoid burdening teachers, relied on self-monitoring if feedback was delayed, and inquired about feedback when preparing for tests. Herein, implications for L2 writing pedagogy are provided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 100805"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523001137/pdfft?md5=2c2504e47f0ddac8757e3dd812134274&pid=1-s2.0-S1075293523001137-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do I need feedback or avoid it in L2 writing? Impacts of self-efficacy and shyness on feedback-seeking behavior\",\"authors\":\"Jian Xu ,&nbsp;Yabing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Whether second or foreign (L2) writing self-efficacy predicts feedback-seeking behavior (FSB) positively or negatively remains unresolved. Moreover, empirical research regarding the influence of shyness on FSB is lacking. The investigation of self-efficacy, shyness, and FSB addresses how efficacious and shy individuals seek feedback and provides implications for overcoming shyness and recognizing the need to seek feedback for academic growth. Thus, the aim of the present study is to explore the impact of L2 writing self-efficacy and shyness on FSB. A battery of questionnaires was administered to 606 Chinese participants and six L2 learners’ writing experiences were elicited in relation to the three concepts. The quantitative results revealed that linguistic self-efficacy negatively impacted feedback inquiry, whereas performance self-efficacy positively impacted it. Further, self-regulatory self-efficacy had a positive impact on both feedback monitoring and inquiry. Shyness had a positive impact on feedback monitoring. Interviews revealed that L2 learners were confident about grammar and vocabulary in writing, but they struggled with organization, self-monitored feedback to avoid burdening teachers, relied on self-monitoring if feedback was delayed, and inquired about feedback when preparing for tests. Herein, implications for L2 writing pedagogy are provided.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523001137/pdfft?md5=2c2504e47f0ddac8757e3dd812134274&pid=1-s2.0-S1075293523001137-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523001137\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523001137","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二语言或外语(L2)写作自我效能感对反馈寻求行为(FSB)的预测是积极的还是消极的,这个问题仍未解决。此外,有关害羞对FSB影响的实证研究也很缺乏。对自我效能感、害羞和寻求反馈行为的调查,探讨了效能感高的人和害羞的人是如何寻求反馈的,并为克服害羞和认识到寻求反馈对学术成长的必要性提供了启示。因此,本研究旨在探讨 L2 写作自我效能感和害羞对 FSB 的影响。本研究对 606 名中国受试者进行了一系列问卷调查,并结合这三个概念了解了六名 L2 学习者的写作经验。定量结果显示,语言自我效能感对反馈探究有负面影响,而表现自我效能感对反馈探究有正面影响。此外,自我调节自我效能感对反馈监测和探究都有积极影响。害羞对反馈监控有积极影响。访谈显示,L2 学习者对写作中的语法和词汇有信心,但他们在组织方面有困难,他们会自我监控反馈以避免给教师造成负担,如果反馈延迟,他们会依靠自我监控,并在准备考试时询问反馈。在此,我们提出了对第二语言写作教学法的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do I need feedback or avoid it in L2 writing? Impacts of self-efficacy and shyness on feedback-seeking behavior

Whether second or foreign (L2) writing self-efficacy predicts feedback-seeking behavior (FSB) positively or negatively remains unresolved. Moreover, empirical research regarding the influence of shyness on FSB is lacking. The investigation of self-efficacy, shyness, and FSB addresses how efficacious and shy individuals seek feedback and provides implications for overcoming shyness and recognizing the need to seek feedback for academic growth. Thus, the aim of the present study is to explore the impact of L2 writing self-efficacy and shyness on FSB. A battery of questionnaires was administered to 606 Chinese participants and six L2 learners’ writing experiences were elicited in relation to the three concepts. The quantitative results revealed that linguistic self-efficacy negatively impacted feedback inquiry, whereas performance self-efficacy positively impacted it. Further, self-regulatory self-efficacy had a positive impact on both feedback monitoring and inquiry. Shyness had a positive impact on feedback monitoring. Interviews revealed that L2 learners were confident about grammar and vocabulary in writing, but they struggled with organization, self-monitored feedback to avoid burdening teachers, relied on self-monitoring if feedback was delayed, and inquired about feedback when preparing for tests. Herein, implications for L2 writing pedagogy are provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of voice in Chinese English-major undergraduates’ timed and untimed argument writing The impact of task duration on the scoring of independent writing responses of adult L2-English writers A structural equation investigation of linguistic features as indices of writing quality in assessed secondary-level EMI learners’ scientific reports Detecting and assessing AI-generated and human-produced texts: The case of second language writing teachers Validating an integrated reading-into-writing scale with trained university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1