使用印度本土纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)进行的结核菌素测试与国际标准 PPD 的一致性仅为中等水平

Devasahayam J. Christopher , N. Priya , Deepa Shankar , Barney Isaac , Andrea DeLuca , Sonali Sarkar , Senbagavalli Prakash Babu , Prasanna Samuel , Adithya Cattamanchi , Amita Gupta , Jerrold Ellner , Sudha Srinivasan , Samyra Cox , Balamugesh Thangakunam
{"title":"使用印度本土纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)进行的结核菌素测试与国际标准 PPD 的一致性仅为中等水平","authors":"Devasahayam J. Christopher ,&nbsp;N. Priya ,&nbsp;Deepa Shankar ,&nbsp;Barney Isaac ,&nbsp;Andrea DeLuca ,&nbsp;Sonali Sarkar ,&nbsp;Senbagavalli Prakash Babu ,&nbsp;Prasanna Samuel ,&nbsp;Adithya Cattamanchi ,&nbsp;Amita Gupta ,&nbsp;Jerrold Ellner ,&nbsp;Sudha Srinivasan ,&nbsp;Samyra Cox ,&nbsp;Balamugesh Thangakunam","doi":"10.1016/j.jctube.2023.100404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In India, the prevalence of Latent TB infection (LTBI) is estimated to be around 40%. Various formulations of PPD(Purified protein derivative) are available, for diagnosis of LTBI, which may give variable responses. The commercially available PPD in India is by Arkray Healthcare (TST-Arkray). It is unclear if this product may have a similar sensitivity compared to other internationally accepted tuberculins (TST-Tubersol).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the performance of the two TSTs compared to Quantiferon-Gold Plus (QFT-Plus).</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A blood sample was collected for the QFT-Plus test. Both the TSTs were placed in the right and the left volar aspect of the forearms and 48 hrs later, the subjects came back to the study site for reading.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 512 participants who were recruited, 326 subjects were healthcare professionals and 186 subjects were household contacts of patients with tuberculosis. They were tested with both TST-Tubersol and TST-Arkray, 139(27 %) participants tested positive for TST-Tubersol (≥10 mm), whereas 203 participants (40.1 %)tested positive for TST-Arkray. There was moderate agreement between the two tests with k = 0.58. Also, there was only poor agreement between both the TSTs with QFT Plus(kappa = 0.19 for Tubersol and 0.17 for Arkray). With QFT-Plus as gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of TST-Tubersol, ast an induration cut-off of 10 mm was 46.8 %,76.3 %,31.8 % and 85.8 %. respectively and TST- Arkray; 60.6 %, 64 %, 28.5 % and 87.2 % respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Indian TST (Arkray Diagnostics) has shown moderate agreement with the internationally accepted Tubersol. Additionally, there was poor agreement between the TSTs and QFT plus test.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579423000608/pdfft?md5=f241b1c00e529358b2937fdf7d0764ab&pid=1-s2.0-S2405579423000608-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tuberculin test using Indian indigenous purified-protein derivative (PPD) shows only moderate agreement with international standard PPD\",\"authors\":\"Devasahayam J. Christopher ,&nbsp;N. Priya ,&nbsp;Deepa Shankar ,&nbsp;Barney Isaac ,&nbsp;Andrea DeLuca ,&nbsp;Sonali Sarkar ,&nbsp;Senbagavalli Prakash Babu ,&nbsp;Prasanna Samuel ,&nbsp;Adithya Cattamanchi ,&nbsp;Amita Gupta ,&nbsp;Jerrold Ellner ,&nbsp;Sudha Srinivasan ,&nbsp;Samyra Cox ,&nbsp;Balamugesh Thangakunam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jctube.2023.100404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In India, the prevalence of Latent TB infection (LTBI) is estimated to be around 40%. Various formulations of PPD(Purified protein derivative) are available, for diagnosis of LTBI, which may give variable responses. The commercially available PPD in India is by Arkray Healthcare (TST-Arkray). It is unclear if this product may have a similar sensitivity compared to other internationally accepted tuberculins (TST-Tubersol).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the performance of the two TSTs compared to Quantiferon-Gold Plus (QFT-Plus).</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A blood sample was collected for the QFT-Plus test. Both the TSTs were placed in the right and the left volar aspect of the forearms and 48 hrs later, the subjects came back to the study site for reading.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 512 participants who were recruited, 326 subjects were healthcare professionals and 186 subjects were household contacts of patients with tuberculosis. They were tested with both TST-Tubersol and TST-Arkray, 139(27 %) participants tested positive for TST-Tubersol (≥10 mm), whereas 203 participants (40.1 %)tested positive for TST-Arkray. There was moderate agreement between the two tests with k = 0.58. Also, there was only poor agreement between both the TSTs with QFT Plus(kappa = 0.19 for Tubersol and 0.17 for Arkray). With QFT-Plus as gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of TST-Tubersol, ast an induration cut-off of 10 mm was 46.8 %,76.3 %,31.8 % and 85.8 %. respectively and TST- Arkray; 60.6 %, 64 %, 28.5 % and 87.2 % respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Indian TST (Arkray Diagnostics) has shown moderate agreement with the internationally accepted Tubersol. Additionally, there was poor agreement between the TSTs and QFT plus test.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579423000608/pdfft?md5=f241b1c00e529358b2937fdf7d0764ab&pid=1-s2.0-S2405579423000608-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579423000608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579423000608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景印度的潜伏肺结核感染率(LTBI)估计约为 40%。用于诊断 LTBI 的 PPD(纯化蛋白衍生物)有多种配方,其反应可能各不相同。印度市售的 PPD 由 Arkray Healthcare(TST-Arkray)生产。目前还不清楚该产品与其他国际公认的结核菌素(TST-Tubersol)相比是否具有相似的灵敏度。方法收集血液样本用于 QFT-Plus 检测。结果在招募的 512 名参与者中,326 名是医护人员,186 名是结核病患者的家庭接触者。他们同时接受了 TST-Tubersol 和 TST-Arkray 检测,其中 139 人(27%)的 TST-Tubersol 检测结果呈阳性(≥10 mm),而 203 人(40.1%)的 TST-Arkray 检测结果呈阳性。这两项检测结果的吻合度中等,k = 0.58。此外,两种 TST 与 QFT Plus 的一致性较差(Tubersol 的 kappa = 0.19,Arkray 的 kappa = 0.17)。以 QFT-Plus 作为金标准,TST-Tubersol(以 10 mm 为压痕临界值)和 TST- Arkray 的灵敏度、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 46.8%、76.3%、31.8% 和 85.8%;TST-Arkray 分别为 60.6%、64%、28.5% 和 87.2%。此外,TST 与 QFT plus 测试之间的一致性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tuberculin test using Indian indigenous purified-protein derivative (PPD) shows only moderate agreement with international standard PPD

Background

In India, the prevalence of Latent TB infection (LTBI) is estimated to be around 40%. Various formulations of PPD(Purified protein derivative) are available, for diagnosis of LTBI, which may give variable responses. The commercially available PPD in India is by Arkray Healthcare (TST-Arkray). It is unclear if this product may have a similar sensitivity compared to other internationally accepted tuberculins (TST-Tubersol).

Objectives

To assess the performance of the two TSTs compared to Quantiferon-Gold Plus (QFT-Plus).

Methodology

A blood sample was collected for the QFT-Plus test. Both the TSTs were placed in the right and the left volar aspect of the forearms and 48 hrs later, the subjects came back to the study site for reading.

Results

Among the 512 participants who were recruited, 326 subjects were healthcare professionals and 186 subjects were household contacts of patients with tuberculosis. They were tested with both TST-Tubersol and TST-Arkray, 139(27 %) participants tested positive for TST-Tubersol (≥10 mm), whereas 203 participants (40.1 %)tested positive for TST-Arkray. There was moderate agreement between the two tests with k = 0.58. Also, there was only poor agreement between both the TSTs with QFT Plus(kappa = 0.19 for Tubersol and 0.17 for Arkray). With QFT-Plus as gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of TST-Tubersol, ast an induration cut-off of 10 mm was 46.8 %,76.3 %,31.8 % and 85.8 %. respectively and TST- Arkray; 60.6 %, 64 %, 28.5 % and 87.2 % respectively.

Conclusion

The Indian TST (Arkray Diagnostics) has shown moderate agreement with the internationally accepted Tubersol. Additionally, there was poor agreement between the TSTs and QFT plus test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases aims to provide a forum for clinically relevant articles on all aspects of tuberculosis and other mycobacterial infections, including (but not limited to) epidemiology, clinical investigation, transmission, diagnosis, treatment, drug-resistance and public policy, and encourages the submission of clinical studies, thematic reviews and case reports. Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases is an Open Access publication.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of nutritional support in combination with standard Buruli ulcer treatment: A case study in Côte d’Ivoire Computational investigation of the global prevalence of multidrug resistant Mycobacterium leprae: A systematic review and meta-analysis Endogenous reactivation cases identified by whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Exploration of possible causes in Latvian tuberculosis patients Bovine tuberculosis reactor cattle in Southwest Ethiopia: Risk factors for bovine tuberculosis Rapidly growing knowledge of Mycobacterium smegmatis: A case series and review of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1