DEXi-乳制品:评估欧洲各地区乳制品生产系统可持续性的事后多标准工具

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agronomy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1007/s13593-023-00935-3
Aurelie Wilfart, Vincent Baillet, Lorraine Balaine, Xabier Díaz de Otálora, Federico Dragoni, Dominika Joanna Krol, Joanna Frątczak-Müller, Anna Rychła, Divina Gracia P. Rodriguez, James Breen, Vasileios Anestis, Cathal Buckley, Habtamu Alem, Wilfried Winiwarter, Nouraya Akkal-Corfini, Barbara Amon
{"title":"DEXi-乳制品:评估欧洲各地区乳制品生产系统可持续性的事后多标准工具","authors":"Aurelie Wilfart,&nbsp;Vincent Baillet,&nbsp;Lorraine Balaine,&nbsp;Xabier Díaz de Otálora,&nbsp;Federico Dragoni,&nbsp;Dominika Joanna Krol,&nbsp;Joanna Frątczak-Müller,&nbsp;Anna Rychła,&nbsp;Divina Gracia P. Rodriguez,&nbsp;James Breen,&nbsp;Vasileios Anestis,&nbsp;Cathal Buckley,&nbsp;Habtamu Alem,&nbsp;Wilfried Winiwarter,&nbsp;Nouraya Akkal-Corfini,&nbsp;Barbara Amon","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00935-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Growing awareness of global challenges and increasing pressures on the farming sector, including the urgent requirement to rapidly cut greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, emphasize the need for sustainable production, which is particularly relevant for dairy production systems. Comparing dairy production systems across the three sustainability dimensions is a considerable challenge, notably due to the heterogeneity of production conditions in Europe. To overcome this, we developed an ex post multicriteria assessment tool that adopts a holistic approach across the three sustainability dimensions. This tool is based on the DEXi framework, which associates a hierarchical decision model with an expert perspective and follows a tree shaped structure; thus, we called it the DEXi-Dairy tool. For each dimension of sustainability, qualitative attributes were defined and organized in themes, sub-themes, and indicators. Their choice was guided by three objectives: (i) better describe main challenges faced by European dairy production systems, (ii) point out synergies and trade-offs across sustainability dimensions, and (iii) contribute to the identification of GHG mitigation strategies at the farm level. Qualitative scales for each theme, sub-theme, and indicator were defined together with weighting factors used to aggregate each level of the tree. Based on selected indicators, a list of farm data requirements was developed to populate the sustainability tree. The model was then tested on seven case study farms distributed across Europe. DEXi-Dairy presents a qualitative method that allows for the comparison of different inputs and the evaluation of the three sustainability dimensions in an integrated manner. By assessing synergies and trade-offs across sustainability dimensions, DEXi-Dairy is able to reflect the heterogeneity of dairy production systems. Results indicate that, while trade-offs occasionally exist among respective selected sub-themes, certain farming systems tend to achieve a higher sustainability score than others and hence could serve as benchmarks for further analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00935-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEXi-Dairy: an ex post multicriteria tool to assess the sustainability of dairy production systems in various European regions\",\"authors\":\"Aurelie Wilfart,&nbsp;Vincent Baillet,&nbsp;Lorraine Balaine,&nbsp;Xabier Díaz de Otálora,&nbsp;Federico Dragoni,&nbsp;Dominika Joanna Krol,&nbsp;Joanna Frątczak-Müller,&nbsp;Anna Rychła,&nbsp;Divina Gracia P. Rodriguez,&nbsp;James Breen,&nbsp;Vasileios Anestis,&nbsp;Cathal Buckley,&nbsp;Habtamu Alem,&nbsp;Wilfried Winiwarter,&nbsp;Nouraya Akkal-Corfini,&nbsp;Barbara Amon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-023-00935-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Growing awareness of global challenges and increasing pressures on the farming sector, including the urgent requirement to rapidly cut greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, emphasize the need for sustainable production, which is particularly relevant for dairy production systems. Comparing dairy production systems across the three sustainability dimensions is a considerable challenge, notably due to the heterogeneity of production conditions in Europe. To overcome this, we developed an ex post multicriteria assessment tool that adopts a holistic approach across the three sustainability dimensions. This tool is based on the DEXi framework, which associates a hierarchical decision model with an expert perspective and follows a tree shaped structure; thus, we called it the DEXi-Dairy tool. For each dimension of sustainability, qualitative attributes were defined and organized in themes, sub-themes, and indicators. Their choice was guided by three objectives: (i) better describe main challenges faced by European dairy production systems, (ii) point out synergies and trade-offs across sustainability dimensions, and (iii) contribute to the identification of GHG mitigation strategies at the farm level. Qualitative scales for each theme, sub-theme, and indicator were defined together with weighting factors used to aggregate each level of the tree. Based on selected indicators, a list of farm data requirements was developed to populate the sustainability tree. The model was then tested on seven case study farms distributed across Europe. DEXi-Dairy presents a qualitative method that allows for the comparison of different inputs and the evaluation of the three sustainability dimensions in an integrated manner. By assessing synergies and trade-offs across sustainability dimensions, DEXi-Dairy is able to reflect the heterogeneity of dairy production systems. Results indicate that, while trade-offs occasionally exist among respective selected sub-themes, certain farming systems tend to achieve a higher sustainability score than others and hence could serve as benchmarks for further analyses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00935-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00935-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00935-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对全球挑战的认识不断提高,农业部门面临的压力日益增大,包括迫切需要迅速减少温室气体(GHG)的排放,这些都强调了可持续生产的必要性,这一点与奶业生产系统尤为相关。从三个可持续性维度对奶业生产系统进行比较是一项相当大的挑战,这主要是由于欧洲生产条件的差异性。为了克服这一难题,我们开发了一种事后多标准评估工具,采用一种跨越三个可持续性维度的整体方法。该工具以 DEXi 框架为基础,将分层决策模型与专家视角相结合,并采用树形结构;因此,我们称之为 DEXi-Dairy 工具。对于可持续性的每个维度,我们都定义了定性属性,并将其组织为主题、子主题和指标。选择这些属性有三个目的:(i)更好地描述欧洲乳制品生产系统所面临的主要挑战;(ii)指出各可持续性维度之间的协同作用和权衡;(iii)有助于确定牧场层面的温室气体减排战略。为每个主题、次主题和指标定义了定性量表,并使用加权因子对树状结构的每个层次进行汇总。根据选定的指标,制定了一份农场数据要求清单,以填充可持续性树。然后在分布于欧洲的七个案例研究牧场对该模型进行了测试。DEXi-Dairy 提出了一种定性方法,可对不同投入进行比较,并以综合方式对三个可持续性维度进行评估。通过评估各可持续性维度之间的协同作用和权衡,DEXi-Dairy 能够反映奶业生产系统的异质性。结果表明,虽然在各自选定的子主题之间偶尔存在权衡,但某些牧场系统的可持续性得分往往高于其他系统,因此可作为进一步分析的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DEXi-Dairy: an ex post multicriteria tool to assess the sustainability of dairy production systems in various European regions

Growing awareness of global challenges and increasing pressures on the farming sector, including the urgent requirement to rapidly cut greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, emphasize the need for sustainable production, which is particularly relevant for dairy production systems. Comparing dairy production systems across the three sustainability dimensions is a considerable challenge, notably due to the heterogeneity of production conditions in Europe. To overcome this, we developed an ex post multicriteria assessment tool that adopts a holistic approach across the three sustainability dimensions. This tool is based on the DEXi framework, which associates a hierarchical decision model with an expert perspective and follows a tree shaped structure; thus, we called it the DEXi-Dairy tool. For each dimension of sustainability, qualitative attributes were defined and organized in themes, sub-themes, and indicators. Their choice was guided by three objectives: (i) better describe main challenges faced by European dairy production systems, (ii) point out synergies and trade-offs across sustainability dimensions, and (iii) contribute to the identification of GHG mitigation strategies at the farm level. Qualitative scales for each theme, sub-theme, and indicator were defined together with weighting factors used to aggregate each level of the tree. Based on selected indicators, a list of farm data requirements was developed to populate the sustainability tree. The model was then tested on seven case study farms distributed across Europe. DEXi-Dairy presents a qualitative method that allows for the comparison of different inputs and the evaluation of the three sustainability dimensions in an integrated manner. By assessing synergies and trade-offs across sustainability dimensions, DEXi-Dairy is able to reflect the heterogeneity of dairy production systems. Results indicate that, while trade-offs occasionally exist among respective selected sub-themes, certain farming systems tend to achieve a higher sustainability score than others and hence could serve as benchmarks for further analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
期刊最新文献
Adaptation rather than adoption: a case study of cropping system change in West Africa Versatile crop yield estimator Carbon footprint of mixed farming crop-livestock rotational-based grazing beef systems using long term experimental data Multidimensional measures of farmer well-being: A scoping review Determinants of oilseed rape-service plant intercropping performance variability across a farmers’ fields network in Western Switzerland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1