莱斯品种马铃薯的知识产权--是公共利益还是私人利益?

Jayakrishnan S
{"title":"莱斯品种马铃薯的知识产权--是公共利益还是私人利益?","authors":"Jayakrishnan S","doi":"10.1108/eemcs-03-2023-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning outcomes\nThe objectives of the case study are to provide an overview of intellectual property rights and intellectual property rights in Indian context; understand the intellectual property rights implementation and challenges for implementing it in emerging economies; understand what would be the best approach that companies can adopt when the companies face backlash in such circumstances; and explore the scope for redefining the intellectual property rights in the changing global environment.\n\nCase overview/synopsis\nIn December 2021, the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPV&FRA) in India revoked the plant variety protection (PVP) certificate granted to PepsiCo India Holding (PHI) for its Lays variety potato (FL-2027, known as FC-5). The FC-5 variety possessed low moisture content which made it suitable for making potato chips. The controversy started with Pepsi suing the small and marginal farmers of Gujarat for alleged patent infringement and cultivating the patented variety. Pepsi’s legal suit against nine marginal potato farmers in Gujarat initiated the dispute over how intellectual property (IP) rights are used to intimidate small, marginal farmers and its infringement of farmers’ rights. But, on the other side, the interesting aspect was how IP infringement could be a setback for the companies that made the capital investment to develop the variety. The case study discusses the backlash Pepsi faced due to this IP rights legal suit and the punitive aspects of IP rights (IPR) law. Moreover, in the context of the global pandemic, the case study helped discuss the need to redefine the intellectual property rights regime keeping in mind global welfare.\n\nComplexity academic level\nThe case is intended for use in postgraduate-level management courses in agricultural marketing, agribusiness, international business and economics. This study can help management students understand how IPR is defined, the apparent complexities associated with it and the adverse effect of it on small and marginal farmers in emerging economies.\n\nSupplementary materials\nTeaching notes are available for educators only.\n\nSubject code\nCSS 5: International business.\n","PeriodicalId":36648,"journal":{"name":"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IPR of Lays variety potato – Is it a matter of public or private interests?\",\"authors\":\"Jayakrishnan S\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/eemcs-03-2023-0090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning outcomes\\nThe objectives of the case study are to provide an overview of intellectual property rights and intellectual property rights in Indian context; understand the intellectual property rights implementation and challenges for implementing it in emerging economies; understand what would be the best approach that companies can adopt when the companies face backlash in such circumstances; and explore the scope for redefining the intellectual property rights in the changing global environment.\\n\\nCase overview/synopsis\\nIn December 2021, the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPV&FRA) in India revoked the plant variety protection (PVP) certificate granted to PepsiCo India Holding (PHI) for its Lays variety potato (FL-2027, known as FC-5). The FC-5 variety possessed low moisture content which made it suitable for making potato chips. The controversy started with Pepsi suing the small and marginal farmers of Gujarat for alleged patent infringement and cultivating the patented variety. Pepsi’s legal suit against nine marginal potato farmers in Gujarat initiated the dispute over how intellectual property (IP) rights are used to intimidate small, marginal farmers and its infringement of farmers’ rights. But, on the other side, the interesting aspect was how IP infringement could be a setback for the companies that made the capital investment to develop the variety. The case study discusses the backlash Pepsi faced due to this IP rights legal suit and the punitive aspects of IP rights (IPR) law. Moreover, in the context of the global pandemic, the case study helped discuss the need to redefine the intellectual property rights regime keeping in mind global welfare.\\n\\nComplexity academic level\\nThe case is intended for use in postgraduate-level management courses in agricultural marketing, agribusiness, international business and economics. This study can help management students understand how IPR is defined, the apparent complexities associated with it and the adverse effect of it on small and marginal farmers in emerging economies.\\n\\nSupplementary materials\\nTeaching notes are available for educators only.\\n\\nSubject code\\nCSS 5: International business.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/eemcs-03-2023-0090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/eemcs-03-2023-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习成果案例研究的目的是提供印度知识产权和知识产权的概述;了解知识产权的实施和挑战,在新兴经济体实施它;了解当公司在这种情况下面临反弹时,公司可以采取的最佳方法是什么;并探讨在不断变化的全球环境中重新定义知识产权的范围。2021年12月,印度植物品种保护和农民权利管理局(PPV&FRA)撤销了授予百事印度控股公司(PHI)的植物品种保护(PVP)证书,该证书授予百事印度控股公司(PHI)的马铃薯品种(FL-2027,称为FC-5)。FC-5品种水分含量低,适于制作薯片。这场争议始于百事可乐起诉古吉拉特邦的小农民和边缘农民涉嫌侵犯专利和种植专利品种。百事可乐对古吉拉特邦九名边缘马铃薯农民提起的法律诉讼引发了关于知识产权(IP)如何被用来恐吓小的边缘农民及其侵犯农民权利的争议。但另一方面,有趣的是,知识产权侵权对那些投入资金开发游戏的公司来说可能是一种挫折。该案例研究讨论了百事可乐因这一知识产权法律诉讼和知识产权法律的惩罚性方面所面临的反弹。此外,在全球大流行病的背景下,案例研究有助于讨论在考虑到全球福利的情况下重新定义知识产权制度的必要性。本案例适用于农业市场营销、农业综合企业、国际商务和经济学的研究生管理课程。这项研究可以帮助管理专业的学生理解知识产权是如何定义的,与之相关的明显复杂性,以及它对新兴经济体中小农和边缘农民的不利影响。补充材料教学笔记只供教育工作者使用。科目codeCSS 5:国际商务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IPR of Lays variety potato – Is it a matter of public or private interests?
Learning outcomes The objectives of the case study are to provide an overview of intellectual property rights and intellectual property rights in Indian context; understand the intellectual property rights implementation and challenges for implementing it in emerging economies; understand what would be the best approach that companies can adopt when the companies face backlash in such circumstances; and explore the scope for redefining the intellectual property rights in the changing global environment. Case overview/synopsis In December 2021, the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPV&FRA) in India revoked the plant variety protection (PVP) certificate granted to PepsiCo India Holding (PHI) for its Lays variety potato (FL-2027, known as FC-5). The FC-5 variety possessed low moisture content which made it suitable for making potato chips. The controversy started with Pepsi suing the small and marginal farmers of Gujarat for alleged patent infringement and cultivating the patented variety. Pepsi’s legal suit against nine marginal potato farmers in Gujarat initiated the dispute over how intellectual property (IP) rights are used to intimidate small, marginal farmers and its infringement of farmers’ rights. But, on the other side, the interesting aspect was how IP infringement could be a setback for the companies that made the capital investment to develop the variety. The case study discusses the backlash Pepsi faced due to this IP rights legal suit and the punitive aspects of IP rights (IPR) law. Moreover, in the context of the global pandemic, the case study helped discuss the need to redefine the intellectual property rights regime keeping in mind global welfare. Complexity academic level The case is intended for use in postgraduate-level management courses in agricultural marketing, agribusiness, international business and economics. This study can help management students understand how IPR is defined, the apparent complexities associated with it and the adverse effect of it on small and marginal farmers in emerging economies. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 5: International business.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies
Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊最新文献
Dos Hemisferios: putting high-quality Ecuadorian wines on the map Protecting digital rights of India: planning for succession at Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) Redesigning the HR processes for scaling up ISOQAR (India) Private Limited DealShare: Value Based Positioning in B2C Markets Pizza Italia – Indian pizza brand in the battle of David vs Goliath
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1