覆盖作物对半干旱区葡萄园土壤有机质数量和质量的十年影响

IF 3.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Land Pub Date : 2023-12-08 DOI:10.3390/land12122143
M. Jiménez-González, Hugo López-Romano, P. Carral, Ana María Álvarez-González, J. Herranz-Luque, Blanca Esther Sastre-Rodríguez, A. García‐Díaz, Gregorio Muñoz-Organero, María José Marques
{"title":"覆盖作物对半干旱区葡萄园土壤有机质数量和质量的十年影响","authors":"M. Jiménez-González, Hugo López-Romano, P. Carral, Ana María Álvarez-González, J. Herranz-Luque, Blanca Esther Sastre-Rodríguez, A. García‐Díaz, Gregorio Muñoz-Organero, María José Marques","doi":"10.3390/land12122143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil organic matter depletion is a significant concern in agricultural soils, impacting crucial aspects of ecosystem health, especially soil properties such as fertility and soil moisture retention. Adopting sustainable soil management practices, such as cover crops, can mitigate this issue. In this study, we analyzed the soil organic carbon (SOC) content and quality in vineyards using two distinct management methods: permanent spontaneous cover crops and conventional tillage. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was quantified and chemically characterized using UV–visible spectroscopy. Our results showed an increase of 4.7 Mg C/ha in the carbon stock (50 cm depth) after 10 years of implementing vegetation covers compared with tilled soil. Additionally, cover crop management increased less humified soluble carbon in surface soil layers, while tillage transformed the solubilized carbon. This finding is important because tilled soil becomes more accessible to microbial degradation and leaching, which, in the long term, leads to a SOM content decrease. In conclusion, an increase in carbon stock was observed when using cover crops due to the incorporation of fresh organic matter, whereas tilled soils showed a depletion of carbon stock, including the mobilization of more stable carbon.","PeriodicalId":37702,"journal":{"name":"Land","volume":"22 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten-Year Impact of Cover Crops on Soil Organic Matter Quantity and Quality in Semi-Arid Vineyards\",\"authors\":\"M. Jiménez-González, Hugo López-Romano, P. Carral, Ana María Álvarez-González, J. Herranz-Luque, Blanca Esther Sastre-Rodríguez, A. García‐Díaz, Gregorio Muñoz-Organero, María José Marques\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/land12122143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil organic matter depletion is a significant concern in agricultural soils, impacting crucial aspects of ecosystem health, especially soil properties such as fertility and soil moisture retention. Adopting sustainable soil management practices, such as cover crops, can mitigate this issue. In this study, we analyzed the soil organic carbon (SOC) content and quality in vineyards using two distinct management methods: permanent spontaneous cover crops and conventional tillage. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was quantified and chemically characterized using UV–visible spectroscopy. Our results showed an increase of 4.7 Mg C/ha in the carbon stock (50 cm depth) after 10 years of implementing vegetation covers compared with tilled soil. Additionally, cover crop management increased less humified soluble carbon in surface soil layers, while tillage transformed the solubilized carbon. This finding is important because tilled soil becomes more accessible to microbial degradation and leaching, which, in the long term, leads to a SOM content decrease. In conclusion, an increase in carbon stock was observed when using cover crops due to the incorporation of fresh organic matter, whereas tilled soils showed a depletion of carbon stock, including the mobilization of more stable carbon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land\",\"volume\":\"22 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/land12122143\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/land12122143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤有机质耗竭是农业土壤的一个重要问题,影响着生态系统健康的关键方面,特别是土壤性质,如肥力和土壤水分保持。采用可持续的土壤管理措施,如覆盖作物,可以缓解这一问题。本研究分析了葡萄园土壤有机碳(SOC)含量和质量,采用两种不同的管理方法:永久自然覆盖作物和常规耕作。采用紫外可见光谱法对溶解有机碳(DOC)进行了定量分析和化学表征。结果表明,与耕作土壤相比,实施植被覆盖10年后,土壤碳储量(50 cm深度)增加4.7 Mg C/ha。此外,覆盖作物管理增加了表层土壤中腐殖质可溶性碳,而耕作则改变了可溶性碳。这一发现很重要,因为耕作过的土壤更容易被微生物降解和浸出,从长远来看,这会导致SOM含量下降。综上所述,由于新鲜有机质的加入,覆盖作物增加了碳储量,而耕作土壤则显示出碳储量的枯竭,包括更稳定的碳的动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ten-Year Impact of Cover Crops on Soil Organic Matter Quantity and Quality in Semi-Arid Vineyards
Soil organic matter depletion is a significant concern in agricultural soils, impacting crucial aspects of ecosystem health, especially soil properties such as fertility and soil moisture retention. Adopting sustainable soil management practices, such as cover crops, can mitigate this issue. In this study, we analyzed the soil organic carbon (SOC) content and quality in vineyards using two distinct management methods: permanent spontaneous cover crops and conventional tillage. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was quantified and chemically characterized using UV–visible spectroscopy. Our results showed an increase of 4.7 Mg C/ha in the carbon stock (50 cm depth) after 10 years of implementing vegetation covers compared with tilled soil. Additionally, cover crop management increased less humified soluble carbon in surface soil layers, while tillage transformed the solubilized carbon. This finding is important because tilled soil becomes more accessible to microbial degradation and leaching, which, in the long term, leads to a SOM content decrease. In conclusion, an increase in carbon stock was observed when using cover crops due to the incorporation of fresh organic matter, whereas tilled soils showed a depletion of carbon stock, including the mobilization of more stable carbon.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land
Land ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
1927
期刊介绍: Land is an international and cross-disciplinary, peer-reviewed, open access journal of land system science, landscape, soil–sediment–water systems, urban study, land–climate interactions, water–energy–land–food (WELF) nexus, biodiversity research and health nexus, land modelling and data processing, ecosystem services, and multifunctionality and sustainability etc., published monthly online by MDPI. The International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE), European Land-use Institute (ELI), and Landscape Institute (LI) are affiliated with Land, and their members receive a discount on the article processing charge.
期刊最新文献
Rice Terrace Experience in Japan: An Ode to the Beauty of Seasonality and Nostalgia Market Access and Agricultural Diversification: An Analysis of Brazilian Municipalities The Role of Vegetation Monitoring in the Conservation of Coastal Habitats N2000: A Case Study of a Wetland Area in Southeast Sicily (Italy) Analysis of Land Suitability for Maize Production under Climate Change and Its Mitigation Potential through Crop Residue Management Public Private Partnership to Brownfield Remediation Projects in China: A Combined Risk Evaluation Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1