数字视频录制的模拟缝合技能测试是否比传统的兽医学生当面评估更能减轻压力和焦虑?

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of veterinary medical education Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.3138/jvme-2023-0091
Brigitte A. Brisson, R. Dobberstein, Gabrielle Monteith, Andria Jones
{"title":"数字视频录制的模拟缝合技能测试是否比传统的兽医学生当面评估更能减轻压力和焦虑?","authors":"Brigitte A. Brisson, R. Dobberstein, Gabrielle Monteith, Andria Jones","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2023-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anxiety can affect exam performance so exploring methods to improve mental health and academic performance is relevant. The objectives of this study were to investigate stress amongst veterinary students undergoing simulated suture skills examinations and determine if digital video recording can reduce stress compared to in-person examination. Thirty-nine students were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo two simulated suture examinations, a session proctored by an in-person examiner or one digitally recorded with no proctor present and then crossed over to the other group. Survey data, modified State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), salivary cortisol, heart rate (HR) and blood pressures were obtained at baseline, prior to, and post-examinations. STAI scores were significantly higher post- in-person examination compared to pre- in-person examination ( p = .0014) for first session. Pre- examination STAI scores were significantly higher for in-person examinations compared to recorded examinations ( p = .0312) during the second session. Blood pressure was significantly higher during the first session regardless of examination type ( p = .018) and HR was lower at baseline than pre- and post-examination, regardless of exam type (p<.0001). Students reported more stress with in-person examinations (p<.0001) and that if given a choice, they would preferentially opt for recorded examinations ( p < .0001). Twenty-eight of 32 students with prior suture skills examination experience reported that the simulated examination was less stressful. STAI scores and self-reported stress levels were significantly lower following recorded exams. Digital video recording of skills testing can reduce perceived stress in veterinary students compared to traditional in-person skills examination.","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":"54 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Digital Video Recorded Simulated Suture Skills Testing Associated With Lower Stress and Anxiety Than Traditional In-Person Assessment for Veterinary Students?\",\"authors\":\"Brigitte A. Brisson, R. Dobberstein, Gabrielle Monteith, Andria Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jvme-2023-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anxiety can affect exam performance so exploring methods to improve mental health and academic performance is relevant. The objectives of this study were to investigate stress amongst veterinary students undergoing simulated suture skills examinations and determine if digital video recording can reduce stress compared to in-person examination. Thirty-nine students were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo two simulated suture examinations, a session proctored by an in-person examiner or one digitally recorded with no proctor present and then crossed over to the other group. Survey data, modified State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), salivary cortisol, heart rate (HR) and blood pressures were obtained at baseline, prior to, and post-examinations. STAI scores were significantly higher post- in-person examination compared to pre- in-person examination ( p = .0014) for first session. Pre- examination STAI scores were significantly higher for in-person examinations compared to recorded examinations ( p = .0312) during the second session. Blood pressure was significantly higher during the first session regardless of examination type ( p = .018) and HR was lower at baseline than pre- and post-examination, regardless of exam type (p<.0001). Students reported more stress with in-person examinations (p<.0001) and that if given a choice, they would preferentially opt for recorded examinations ( p < .0001). Twenty-eight of 32 students with prior suture skills examination experience reported that the simulated examination was less stressful. STAI scores and self-reported stress levels were significantly lower following recorded exams. Digital video recording of skills testing can reduce perceived stress in veterinary students compared to traditional in-person skills examination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2023-0091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2023-0091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焦虑会影响考试成绩,因此探索改善心理健康和学习成绩的方法是相关的。本研究的目的是调查兽医学生在进行模拟缝合技能检查时的压力,并确定与现场检查相比,数字视频记录是否可以减轻压力。39名学生被纳入前瞻性研究,随机接受两次模拟缝合检查,一次由现场检查人员监督,或一次在没有监考人员在场的情况下进行数字记录,然后转到另一组。在基线、检查前和检查后获得调查数据、改进的状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、唾液皮质醇、心率(HR)和血压。与第一次面对面检查前相比,面对面检查后的STAI得分显著较高(p = 0.0014)。在第二阶段,面对面检查的考试前STAI分数明显高于记录检查(p = 0.0312)。无论检查类型如何,第一次检查时血压显著升高(p = 0.018),基线HR低于检查前和检查后,无论检查类型如何(p< 0.0001)。学生报告说,面对面考试的压力更大(p< 0.0001),如果有选择,他们会优先选择记录考试(p< 0.0001)。32名有缝合技能考试经验的学生中有28名报告模拟考试压力较小。在记录考试后,STAI分数和自我报告的压力水平显著降低。与传统的面对面技能考试相比,技能测试的数字视频记录可以减少兽医学生的感知压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Digital Video Recorded Simulated Suture Skills Testing Associated With Lower Stress and Anxiety Than Traditional In-Person Assessment for Veterinary Students?
Anxiety can affect exam performance so exploring methods to improve mental health and academic performance is relevant. The objectives of this study were to investigate stress amongst veterinary students undergoing simulated suture skills examinations and determine if digital video recording can reduce stress compared to in-person examination. Thirty-nine students were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo two simulated suture examinations, a session proctored by an in-person examiner or one digitally recorded with no proctor present and then crossed over to the other group. Survey data, modified State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), salivary cortisol, heart rate (HR) and blood pressures were obtained at baseline, prior to, and post-examinations. STAI scores were significantly higher post- in-person examination compared to pre- in-person examination ( p = .0014) for first session. Pre- examination STAI scores were significantly higher for in-person examinations compared to recorded examinations ( p = .0312) during the second session. Blood pressure was significantly higher during the first session regardless of examination type ( p = .018) and HR was lower at baseline than pre- and post-examination, regardless of exam type (p<.0001). Students reported more stress with in-person examinations (p<.0001) and that if given a choice, they would preferentially opt for recorded examinations ( p < .0001). Twenty-eight of 32 students with prior suture skills examination experience reported that the simulated examination was less stressful. STAI scores and self-reported stress levels were significantly lower following recorded exams. Digital video recording of skills testing can reduce perceived stress in veterinary students compared to traditional in-person skills examination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of Intern Applications and its Relationship to Performance. AAVMC Notes. Cadaveric Prosections Prepared by Qualified Instructional Staff Were More Efficient and Effective Teaching Modalities for Veterinary Gross Anatomy than In-Class Dissections by Students. Thank You & Welcome! Veterinarian Use of and Sentiment Regarding Standard of Care for Feline Ovarian Pedicle Tie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1