国家参与是促进还是破坏绿色创新?

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Creativity and Innovation Management Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1111/caim.12581
Abdul Qadeer, Xu Jiang, Ramiz Ur Rehman, Bohao Deng
{"title":"国家参与是促进还是破坏绿色创新?","authors":"Abdul Qadeer,&nbsp;Xu Jiang,&nbsp;Ramiz Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Bohao Deng","doi":"10.1111/caim.12581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the literature advocates that the state plays a significant role in affecting firms' behaviour in emerging economies, whether state participation promotes or impedes firms' innovation decisions requires further scholarly attention. In this study, we develop a framework in which we examine <i>how</i> and <i>under what conditions</i> state participation affects firms' green innovation. Results from publicly listed firms in China show an inverted U-shaped relationship between state participation and green innovation, so that state participation in the form of minority ownership is most effective for firms seeking to conduct green innovation. This curvilinear relationship is negatively moderated by firm age and firm size, such that the inverted U-shape flattens when a firm is older and larger. The relationship is positively moderated by subnational institutional development such that the inverted U-shape steepens when institutional development is higher. These findings provide useful implications for resource dependence theory in explaining whether state participation serves as a facilitator of or a burden on firms' green innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47923,"journal":{"name":"Creativity and Innovation Management","volume":"33 1","pages":"61-76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does state participation promote or damage green innovation?\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Qadeer,&nbsp;Xu Jiang,&nbsp;Ramiz Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Bohao Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/caim.12581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although the literature advocates that the state plays a significant role in affecting firms' behaviour in emerging economies, whether state participation promotes or impedes firms' innovation decisions requires further scholarly attention. In this study, we develop a framework in which we examine <i>how</i> and <i>under what conditions</i> state participation affects firms' green innovation. Results from publicly listed firms in China show an inverted U-shaped relationship between state participation and green innovation, so that state participation in the form of minority ownership is most effective for firms seeking to conduct green innovation. This curvilinear relationship is negatively moderated by firm age and firm size, such that the inverted U-shape flattens when a firm is older and larger. The relationship is positively moderated by subnational institutional development such that the inverted U-shape steepens when institutional development is higher. These findings provide useful implications for resource dependence theory in explaining whether state participation serves as a facilitator of or a burden on firms' green innovation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creativity and Innovation Management\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"61-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creativity and Innovation Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caim.12581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity and Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caim.12581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管文献主张国家在影响新兴经济体企业行为方面发挥着重要作用,但国家参与是促进还是阻碍了企业的创新决策,还需要进一步的学术关注。在本研究中,我们开发了一个框架,在这个框架中,我们考察了国家参与如何以及在什么条件下影响企业的绿色创新。中国上市公司的研究结果显示,国家参与与绿色创新之间存在倒U型关系,因此,对于寻求进行绿色创新的公司来说,以少数股权形式的国家参与是最有效的。这种曲线关系受公司年龄和公司规模的负向调节,因此当公司年龄更大时,倒U形趋于平缓。地方制度发展对这一关系有正向调节作用,当制度发展越高时,倒U形曲线就越陡峭。这些发现为资源依赖理论解释国家参与是企业绿色创新的推动者还是负担提供了有益的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does state participation promote or damage green innovation?

Although the literature advocates that the state plays a significant role in affecting firms' behaviour in emerging economies, whether state participation promotes or impedes firms' innovation decisions requires further scholarly attention. In this study, we develop a framework in which we examine how and under what conditions state participation affects firms' green innovation. Results from publicly listed firms in China show an inverted U-shaped relationship between state participation and green innovation, so that state participation in the form of minority ownership is most effective for firms seeking to conduct green innovation. This curvilinear relationship is negatively moderated by firm age and firm size, such that the inverted U-shape flattens when a firm is older and larger. The relationship is positively moderated by subnational institutional development such that the inverted U-shape steepens when institutional development is higher. These findings provide useful implications for resource dependence theory in explaining whether state participation serves as a facilitator of or a burden on firms' green innovation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.40%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Creativity and Innovation Management bridges the gap between the theory and practice of organizing imagination and innovation. The journal''s central consideration is how to challenge and facilitate creative potential, and how then to embed this into results-oriented innovative business development. The creativity of individuals, coupled with structured and well-managed innovation projects, creates a sound base from which organizations may operate effectively within their inter-organizational and societal environment. Today, successful operations must go hand in hand with the ability to anticipate future opportunities. Therefore, a cultural focus and inspiring leadership are as crucial to an organization''s success as efficient structural arrangements and support facilities. This is reflected in the journal''s contents: -Leadership for creativity and innovation; the behavioural side of innovation management. -Organizational structures and processes to support creativity and innovation; interconnecting creative and innovative processes. -Creativity, motivation, work environment/creative climate and organizational behaviour, creative and innovative entrepreneurship. -Deliberate development of creative and innovative skills including the use of a variety of tools such as TRIZ or CPS. -Creative professions and personalities; creative products; the relationship between creativity and humour; arts and amp; humanities side of creativity.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The effect of manager's profile on the social innovation in Cameroonian industrial companies Open innovation to scale up the circular economy: Exploring the mediating role of Industry 4.0 technologies Issue Information Critical features of ecosystem practice empowering industrial sustainability transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1