在社会服务领域开展循证实践:工作场所教育的经验和影响

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Workplace Learning Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1108/jwl-12-2022-0168
Birgitta Schwartz, K. Tilling
{"title":"在社会服务领域开展循证实践:工作场所教育的经验和影响","authors":"Birgitta Schwartz, K. Tilling","doi":"10.1108/jwl-12-2022-0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nResearch and experience show that evidence-based practice (EBP), i.e. using the best available knowledge in daily professional work, is difficult to achieve in social services. The purpose of this study is to understand the development of organizational EBP learning processes in daily work through workplace education for staff and managers of supported homes for people with cognitive disabilities. The authors examine how the EBP model and new knowledge are understood and made actionable in the workplace, applying theories of organizational learning.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors used empirical material collected from an EBP workplace education pilot in Sweden, as well as documents on national EBP implementation in Swedish social services. Before the pilot, a focus group interview was conducted with regional senior managers. Participating managers and staff were individually interviewed two to three years after the pilot.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study illustrates how knowledge-based action emerged from education where EBP was interpreted, understood, reflected on, and tested, supported by codified EBP tools in the work context. The participants, when supervised, and when observing and questioning their own behaviors in practice, contributed to double-loop learning (DLL) processes. Codification of EBP knowledge into useful tools and socialization processes during education and workplace meetings was crucial in developing individual and group DLL and knowledge-based actions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe bottom-up approach to EBP development and the adaptive contextual learning at the workplace gave new insights into organizational learning in social service workplaces.\n","PeriodicalId":47077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Learning","volume":"57 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making evidence-based practice actionable in the social service context: experiences and implications of workplace education\",\"authors\":\"Birgitta Schwartz, K. Tilling\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jwl-12-2022-0168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nResearch and experience show that evidence-based practice (EBP), i.e. using the best available knowledge in daily professional work, is difficult to achieve in social services. The purpose of this study is to understand the development of organizational EBP learning processes in daily work through workplace education for staff and managers of supported homes for people with cognitive disabilities. The authors examine how the EBP model and new knowledge are understood and made actionable in the workplace, applying theories of organizational learning.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors used empirical material collected from an EBP workplace education pilot in Sweden, as well as documents on national EBP implementation in Swedish social services. Before the pilot, a focus group interview was conducted with regional senior managers. Participating managers and staff were individually interviewed two to three years after the pilot.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study illustrates how knowledge-based action emerged from education where EBP was interpreted, understood, reflected on, and tested, supported by codified EBP tools in the work context. The participants, when supervised, and when observing and questioning their own behaviors in practice, contributed to double-loop learning (DLL) processes. Codification of EBP knowledge into useful tools and socialization processes during education and workplace meetings was crucial in developing individual and group DLL and knowledge-based actions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe bottom-up approach to EBP development and the adaptive contextual learning at the workplace gave new insights into organizational learning in social service workplaces.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Workplace Learning\",\"volume\":\"57 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Workplace Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-12-2022-0168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-12-2022-0168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究和经验表明,在社会服务中很难实现循证实践(EBP),即在日常专业工作中使用现有的最佳知识。本研究旨在透过对认知障碍之家员工及管理人员的工作场所教育,了解日常工作中组织性EBP学习过程的发展。作者研究了EBP模型和新知识如何被理解,并在工作场所应用组织学习理论。设计/方法/方法作者使用了从瑞典EBP工作场所教育试点中收集的经验材料,以及瑞典社会服务中国家EBP实施的文件。在试点之前,对区域高级管理人员进行了焦点小组访谈。参与的管理人员和工作人员在试点后的两到三年内分别接受了采访。研究结果说明了基于知识的行动是如何从教育中产生的,在教育中,EBP被解释、理解、反思和测试,并在工作环境中得到编纂的EBP工具的支持。参与者在受到监督的情况下,以及在实践中观察和质疑自己的行为时,都有助于双循环学习(DLL)过程。在教育和工作场所会议期间,将EBP知识编纂成有用的工具和社会化过程,对于发展个人和团体DLL和基于知识的行动至关重要。自底向上的EBP开发方法和工作场所的适应性情境学习为社会服务工作场所的组织学习提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making evidence-based practice actionable in the social service context: experiences and implications of workplace education
Purpose Research and experience show that evidence-based practice (EBP), i.e. using the best available knowledge in daily professional work, is difficult to achieve in social services. The purpose of this study is to understand the development of organizational EBP learning processes in daily work through workplace education for staff and managers of supported homes for people with cognitive disabilities. The authors examine how the EBP model and new knowledge are understood and made actionable in the workplace, applying theories of organizational learning. Design/methodology/approach The authors used empirical material collected from an EBP workplace education pilot in Sweden, as well as documents on national EBP implementation in Swedish social services. Before the pilot, a focus group interview was conducted with regional senior managers. Participating managers and staff were individually interviewed two to three years after the pilot. Findings The study illustrates how knowledge-based action emerged from education where EBP was interpreted, understood, reflected on, and tested, supported by codified EBP tools in the work context. The participants, when supervised, and when observing and questioning their own behaviors in practice, contributed to double-loop learning (DLL) processes. Codification of EBP knowledge into useful tools and socialization processes during education and workplace meetings was crucial in developing individual and group DLL and knowledge-based actions. Originality/value The bottom-up approach to EBP development and the adaptive contextual learning at the workplace gave new insights into organizational learning in social service workplaces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Workplace Learning
Journal of Workplace Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Workplace Learning aims to provide an avenue for the presentation and discussion of research related to the workplace as a site for learning. Its scope encompasses formal, informal and incidental learning in the workplace for individuals, groups and teams, as well as work-based learning, and off-the-job learning for the workplace. This focus on learning in, from and for the workplace also brings with it questions about the nature of interventions that might assist the learning process and of the roles of those responsible directly or indirectly for such interventions. Since workplace learning cannot be considered without reference to its context, another aim of the journal is to explore the organisational, policy, political, resource issues and other factors which influence how, when and why that learning takes place.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing learning organizations through employee resilience: Investigating the mediating influence of psychological empowerment Learning organization culture and knowledge sharing: the mediating role of social capital How do care workers learn to care for people with dementia living in care homes? A model of informal learning A catalyst for activation against racism: case study on effectiveness of workplace equity, inclusion and diversity conversations Using SIM-TLX to investigate the potential impacts on cognitive load while undertaking tasks in a virtual workplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1