基于 CRISPR/Cas 的微藻类基因组编辑

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecological genetics Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.17816/ecogen568609
Pavel A. Virolainen, Elena M. Chekunova
{"title":"基于 CRISPR/Cas 的微藻类基因组编辑","authors":"Pavel A. Virolainen, Elena M. Chekunova","doi":"10.17816/ecogen568609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CRISPR/Cas systems are presently the most attractive genome editing technology, that is widely used for genetic engineering of various crops and industrial microorganisms. Currently, application of the CRISPR/Cas based genome editing promises advances in microalgae biotechnology aimed at boosting the output of biofuels and valuable bioactive compounds. However, algae remain relatively complex objects for genetic manipulation [1]. The main problems are associated with the need of a species-oriented approach when creating a transformation toolbox due to the peculiarities in the structure of membranes and the cell wall of a particular taxon. The proper selection and design of a CRISPR construct is also required due to the possible presence of a powerful silencing system against introduced genetic constructs in the cell. These difficulties explain the low efficiency of microalgae transformation and the meager list of successfully edited species [1, 2]. \nThe first instance of genome editing in microalgae using CRISPR/Cas was reported inChlamydomonas reinhardtiiP.A. Dang [3]. To date, four transformation methods (Agrobacterium-mediated, particle bombardment, glass beads agitation, electroporation) have been successfully used for editing (knock-in and knock-out) theC. reinhardtiigenome with two types of CRISPR constructs (plasmid and ribonucleoprotein). The developed protocols make it possible to achieve high efficiency of genomic editing — for example, in our study it varied from 10.6% to 68.8% [4]. These benefits along with completely sequenced genome, well-studied genetics, accessibility and haplontic life cycle makesC.reinhardtiian outstanding model organism for CRISPR/Cas application in microalgae research [5].","PeriodicalId":11431,"journal":{"name":"Ecological genetics","volume":"28 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CRISPR/Cas based genome editing in microalgae\",\"authors\":\"Pavel A. Virolainen, Elena M. Chekunova\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/ecogen568609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CRISPR/Cas systems are presently the most attractive genome editing technology, that is widely used for genetic engineering of various crops and industrial microorganisms. Currently, application of the CRISPR/Cas based genome editing promises advances in microalgae biotechnology aimed at boosting the output of biofuels and valuable bioactive compounds. However, algae remain relatively complex objects for genetic manipulation [1]. The main problems are associated with the need of a species-oriented approach when creating a transformation toolbox due to the peculiarities in the structure of membranes and the cell wall of a particular taxon. The proper selection and design of a CRISPR construct is also required due to the possible presence of a powerful silencing system against introduced genetic constructs in the cell. These difficulties explain the low efficiency of microalgae transformation and the meager list of successfully edited species [1, 2]. \\nThe first instance of genome editing in microalgae using CRISPR/Cas was reported inChlamydomonas reinhardtiiP.A. Dang [3]. To date, four transformation methods (Agrobacterium-mediated, particle bombardment, glass beads agitation, electroporation) have been successfully used for editing (knock-in and knock-out) theC. reinhardtiigenome with two types of CRISPR constructs (plasmid and ribonucleoprotein). The developed protocols make it possible to achieve high efficiency of genomic editing — for example, in our study it varied from 10.6% to 68.8% [4]. These benefits along with completely sequenced genome, well-studied genetics, accessibility and haplontic life cycle makesC.reinhardtiian outstanding model organism for CRISPR/Cas application in microalgae research [5].\",\"PeriodicalId\":11431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological genetics\",\"volume\":\"28 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen568609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen568609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CRISPR/Cas系统是目前最具吸引力的基因组编辑技术,广泛应用于各种作物和工业微生物的基因工程。目前,基于CRISPR/Cas的基因组编辑的应用有望在微藻生物技术方面取得进展,旨在提高生物燃料和有价值的生物活性化合物的产量。然而,藻类仍然是相对复杂的遗传操作对象[1]。由于膜和细胞壁结构的特殊性,在创建转化工具箱时,主要的问题是需要以物种为导向的方法。由于可能存在强大的沉默系统来对抗细胞中引入的遗传结构,因此也需要正确选择和设计CRISPR结构。这些困难解释了微藻转化效率低,成功编辑的物种很少[1,2]。利用CRISPR/Cas技术对微藻进行基因组编辑的第一个实例是莱茵衣藻(chlamydomonas reinhardtiipa)。党[3]。迄今为止,四种转化方法(农杆菌介导、粒子轰击、玻璃珠搅拌、电穿孔)已成功用于编辑(敲入和敲除)c。用两种类型的CRISPR构建体(质粒和核糖核蛋白)来重组基因。开发的方案使实现基因组编辑的高效率成为可能——例如,在我们的研究中,它从10.6%到68.8%不等[4]。这些好处加上完全测序的基因组,充分研究的遗传学,可及性和单倍体生命周期使esc。赖因哈蒂菌是CRISPR/Cas在微藻研究中应用的杰出模式生物[5]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CRISPR/Cas based genome editing in microalgae
CRISPR/Cas systems are presently the most attractive genome editing technology, that is widely used for genetic engineering of various crops and industrial microorganisms. Currently, application of the CRISPR/Cas based genome editing promises advances in microalgae biotechnology aimed at boosting the output of biofuels and valuable bioactive compounds. However, algae remain relatively complex objects for genetic manipulation [1]. The main problems are associated with the need of a species-oriented approach when creating a transformation toolbox due to the peculiarities in the structure of membranes and the cell wall of a particular taxon. The proper selection and design of a CRISPR construct is also required due to the possible presence of a powerful silencing system against introduced genetic constructs in the cell. These difficulties explain the low efficiency of microalgae transformation and the meager list of successfully edited species [1, 2]. The first instance of genome editing in microalgae using CRISPR/Cas was reported inChlamydomonas reinhardtiiP.A. Dang [3]. To date, four transformation methods (Agrobacterium-mediated, particle bombardment, glass beads agitation, electroporation) have been successfully used for editing (knock-in and knock-out) theC. reinhardtiigenome with two types of CRISPR constructs (plasmid and ribonucleoprotein). The developed protocols make it possible to achieve high efficiency of genomic editing — for example, in our study it varied from 10.6% to 68.8% [4]. These benefits along with completely sequenced genome, well-studied genetics, accessibility and haplontic life cycle makesC.reinhardtiian outstanding model organism for CRISPR/Cas application in microalgae research [5].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological genetics
Ecological genetics Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological genetics is an international journal which accepts for consideration original manuscripts that reflect the results of field and experimental studies, and fundamental research of broad conceptual and/or comparative context corresponding to the profile of the Journal. Once a year, the editorial Board reviews and, if necessary, corrects the rules for authors and the journal rubrics.
期刊最新文献
CRISPR/Cas editing of a CPC gene in Arabidopsis thaliana Hairy roots biochemical characteristics of vegetable pea’s morphotype with modified leaf Erratum to “The strong base for using base editing in plants” (doi: 10.17816/ecogen567885) PCR-based genome walking methods (review) Ecological genetics. What is it? 20 years later
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1