从非自由民主的角度看匈牙利行政权对立法权和司法权的主导地位(2010-2021 年)。新体制方法

S. Kubas
{"title":"从非自由民主的角度看匈牙利行政权对立法权和司法权的主导地位(2010-2021 年)。新体制方法","authors":"S. Kubas","doi":"10.17951/bc.2023.8.49-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the problem of limiting the competences of the Hungarian legislative and judiciary at the expense of the increase in the significance of the executive after 2010. Although the Fundamental Law provides the rule of the separation of power, Viktor Orbán and his party, using their position in the parliament and government, limit the autonomy of the judiciary and legislative authorities. From the methodological perspective, the analysis is embedded in the neo institutional approach and derives from the concept of the mechanism of democracy regression proposed by Gerschewski. The main question posed in the article refers to the trajectory of limiting the autonomy of the judiciary and legislative power in Hungary after 2010.","PeriodicalId":355641,"journal":{"name":"Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M – Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Predominance of Hungarian Executive Power over the Legislative and Judiciary Authorities from the Perspective of Illiberal Democracy (2010–2021). A Neo-Institutional Approach\",\"authors\":\"S. Kubas\",\"doi\":\"10.17951/bc.2023.8.49-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the problem of limiting the competences of the Hungarian legislative and judiciary at the expense of the increase in the significance of the executive after 2010. Although the Fundamental Law provides the rule of the separation of power, Viktor Orbán and his party, using their position in the parliament and government, limit the autonomy of the judiciary and legislative authorities. From the methodological perspective, the analysis is embedded in the neo institutional approach and derives from the concept of the mechanism of democracy regression proposed by Gerschewski. The main question posed in the article refers to the trajectory of limiting the autonomy of the judiciary and legislative power in Hungary after 2010.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M – Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis\",\"volume\":\"6 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M – Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17951/bc.2023.8.49-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio M – Balcaniensis et Carpathiensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/bc.2023.8.49-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了2010年以后,匈牙利立法和司法权限受到限制的问题,其代价是行政权力的重要性有所提高。虽然《基本法》规定了权力分立的规则,但维克多Orbán和他的政党利用他们在议会和政府中的地位,限制了司法和立法当局的自主权。从方法论的角度来看,这一分析植根于新制度方法,并源于格舍夫斯基提出的民主回归机制的概念。文章提出的主要问题是2010年后匈牙利限制司法和立法权自治的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Predominance of Hungarian Executive Power over the Legislative and Judiciary Authorities from the Perspective of Illiberal Democracy (2010–2021). A Neo-Institutional Approach
The article analyzes the problem of limiting the competences of the Hungarian legislative and judiciary at the expense of the increase in the significance of the executive after 2010. Although the Fundamental Law provides the rule of the separation of power, Viktor Orbán and his party, using their position in the parliament and government, limit the autonomy of the judiciary and legislative authorities. From the methodological perspective, the analysis is embedded in the neo institutional approach and derives from the concept of the mechanism of democracy regression proposed by Gerschewski. The main question posed in the article refers to the trajectory of limiting the autonomy of the judiciary and legislative power in Hungary after 2010.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Institution of the President in the Political System of the Republic of Serbia Electoral System Changes in Austria – an Assessment of the Political Consequences “Fleeing heir of the Kemalists”. A Picture of a Revolutionary Entourage in the Face of the Challenges and Threats Tugging Contemporary Anatolia Local Governance in Poland and Hungary from a Comparative Perspective Ukrainian Immigration to Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1