特定文化习俗和价值观如何影响国际(罗马尼亚-南韩)婚姻

Q3 Arts and Humanities Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2478/ausp-2023-0025
E. Buja
{"title":"特定文化习俗和价值观如何影响国际(罗马尼亚-南韩)婚姻","authors":"E. Buja","doi":"10.2478/ausp-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of my research study is to identify the barriers that cross-cultural and interracial couples are confronted with and the ways they try to overcome these potential obstacles in order for their marriage to work, with a focus on Romanian–Korean couples (Romanian wives and Korean husbands). At stake are many aspects pertaining to culture such as religious or ideological beliefs (Christianity vs. Confucianism), individualism vs. collectivism, egalitarian vs. non-egalitarian treatment of women, the language adopted by the spouses, family expectations, as well as the discrimination of bi-racial children. The hypothesis underlying the study is that no matter how much the spouses love each other, any difference in values, practices, and behaviours can create problems. Derived from this hypothesis, the following research questions will be addressed in the study: (a) Which particular cultural issues may cause (more) frictions in international, interracial marriages? (b) What steps are taken and by which partner in order to solve the possible culturally triggered problems that appear in their relationship? (c) Are there any advantages to international, interracial marriages? To provide answers to these questions, 7 Romanian–Korean couples have been subjected to a semi-structured interview. The information provided by the respondents has been analysed within the framework of “thematic analysis”, defined by Berelson (1952: 18) as “a research technique for the objective, systematic, and quantitative description of the manifest content of communication.","PeriodicalId":37574,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Culture-Specific Practices and Values May Influence International (Romanian–South Korean) Marriages\",\"authors\":\"E. Buja\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ausp-2023-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of my research study is to identify the barriers that cross-cultural and interracial couples are confronted with and the ways they try to overcome these potential obstacles in order for their marriage to work, with a focus on Romanian–Korean couples (Romanian wives and Korean husbands). At stake are many aspects pertaining to culture such as religious or ideological beliefs (Christianity vs. Confucianism), individualism vs. collectivism, egalitarian vs. non-egalitarian treatment of women, the language adopted by the spouses, family expectations, as well as the discrimination of bi-racial children. The hypothesis underlying the study is that no matter how much the spouses love each other, any difference in values, practices, and behaviours can create problems. Derived from this hypothesis, the following research questions will be addressed in the study: (a) Which particular cultural issues may cause (more) frictions in international, interracial marriages? (b) What steps are taken and by which partner in order to solve the possible culturally triggered problems that appear in their relationship? (c) Are there any advantages to international, interracial marriages? To provide answers to these questions, 7 Romanian–Korean couples have been subjected to a semi-structured interview. The information provided by the respondents has been analysed within the framework of “thematic analysis”, defined by Berelson (1952: 18) as “a research technique for the objective, systematic, and quantitative description of the manifest content of communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2023-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我的研究目的是确定跨文化和跨种族夫妇所面临的障碍,以及他们试图克服这些潜在障碍的方式,以便他们的婚姻工作,重点是罗马尼亚-韩国夫妇(罗马尼亚妻子和韩国丈夫)。利害攸关的是与文化有关的许多方面,如宗教或意识形态信仰(基督教与儒家),个人主义与集体主义,平等主义与非平等主义对待妇女,配偶采用的语言,家庭期望,以及对双种族儿童的歧视。这项研究背后的假设是,无论夫妻彼此多么相爱,价值观、行为习惯和行为上的任何差异都可能产生问题。根据这一假设,本研究将探讨以下研究问题:(a)在国际、跨种族婚姻中,哪些特定的文化问题可能导致(更多)摩擦?(b)为解决在他们的关系中可能出现的由文化引起的问题,采取了哪些步骤,由哪一个伙伴采取了哪些步骤?(c)跨国、跨种族通婚有什么好处吗?为了回答这些问题,对7对罗马尼亚-韩国夫妇进行了半结构化采访。受访者提供的信息在“主题分析”的框架内进行了分析,Berelson(1952: 18)将其定义为“一种客观、系统和定量描述传播显性内容的研究技术”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Culture-Specific Practices and Values May Influence International (Romanian–South Korean) Marriages
Abstract The aim of my research study is to identify the barriers that cross-cultural and interracial couples are confronted with and the ways they try to overcome these potential obstacles in order for their marriage to work, with a focus on Romanian–Korean couples (Romanian wives and Korean husbands). At stake are many aspects pertaining to culture such as religious or ideological beliefs (Christianity vs. Confucianism), individualism vs. collectivism, egalitarian vs. non-egalitarian treatment of women, the language adopted by the spouses, family expectations, as well as the discrimination of bi-racial children. The hypothesis underlying the study is that no matter how much the spouses love each other, any difference in values, practices, and behaviours can create problems. Derived from this hypothesis, the following research questions will be addressed in the study: (a) Which particular cultural issues may cause (more) frictions in international, interracial marriages? (b) What steps are taken and by which partner in order to solve the possible culturally triggered problems that appear in their relationship? (c) Are there any advantages to international, interracial marriages? To provide answers to these questions, 7 Romanian–Korean couples have been subjected to a semi-structured interview. The information provided by the respondents has been analysed within the framework of “thematic analysis”, defined by Berelson (1952: 18) as “a research technique for the objective, systematic, and quantitative description of the manifest content of communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Series Philologica is published in cooperation with Sciendo by De Gruyter. Series Philologica publishes original, previously unpublished articles in the wide field of philological studies, and it is published in 3 issues a year (since 2014). The printed and online version of papers are identical.
期刊最新文献
Diasporic Imagination and Chronotopes Social Implications of Borrowings How Culture-Specific Practices and Values May Influence International (Romanian–South Korean) Marriages Political Discourse and Oppression – Influences on the Mentality and Culture of the Soviet Man Between Two Worlds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1