提高肺癌筛查参与率的全科医生策略--系统性审查方案

Priya Patel, Benjamin Jacob, Barbara Clyne, Alice Le Bonniec, Samantha L. Quaife, Stephen H. Bradley, Patrick Redmond
{"title":"提高肺癌筛查参与率的全科医生策略--系统性审查方案","authors":"Priya Patel, Benjamin Jacob, Barbara Clyne, Alice Le Bonniec, Samantha L. Quaife, Stephen H. Bradley, Patrick Redmond","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13767.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite this, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose CT is substantially low in comparison to established cancer screening programmes. Additionally, those at higher risk of the disease are the least likely to participate in screening, including current smokers and those experiencing socioeconomic deprivation. General practice (which may be referred to as primary care or family medicine depending on location) plays a vital role in screening through the identification of eligible individuals, overcoming participation barriers, and facilitating shared decision-making. Given the low rates of participation, it is important to understand which, if any, strategies from general practice could improve the effectiveness of a national programme. Objectives To assess and quantify the effects of strategies implemented in general practice to increase participation in LCS. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis, where possible, will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be conducted. All randomised trials, non-randomised studies, and quantitative descriptive studies that report recruitment strategies based in general practice and LCS outcomes will be eligible. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias and overall certainty of findings will be assessed using the MMAT and GRADE tools, respectively. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist will be used for data extraction and the Behavioural Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy for data analysis of the components of interventions. Conclusion This review will provide data on the most effective general practice-based recruitment strategies aimed at improving LCS participation. Understanding the most effective and equitable strategies is important in the development of successful LCS and ensuring individuals at the greatest risk can participate.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":" 64","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General practice focussed strategies to increase participation in lung cancer screening – a systematic review protocol\",\"authors\":\"Priya Patel, Benjamin Jacob, Barbara Clyne, Alice Le Bonniec, Samantha L. Quaife, Stephen H. Bradley, Patrick Redmond\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13767.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite this, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose CT is substantially low in comparison to established cancer screening programmes. Additionally, those at higher risk of the disease are the least likely to participate in screening, including current smokers and those experiencing socioeconomic deprivation. General practice (which may be referred to as primary care or family medicine depending on location) plays a vital role in screening through the identification of eligible individuals, overcoming participation barriers, and facilitating shared decision-making. Given the low rates of participation, it is important to understand which, if any, strategies from general practice could improve the effectiveness of a national programme. Objectives To assess and quantify the effects of strategies implemented in general practice to increase participation in LCS. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis, where possible, will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be conducted. All randomised trials, non-randomised studies, and quantitative descriptive studies that report recruitment strategies based in general practice and LCS outcomes will be eligible. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias and overall certainty of findings will be assessed using the MMAT and GRADE tools, respectively. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist will be used for data extraction and the Behavioural Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy for data analysis of the components of interventions. Conclusion This review will provide data on the most effective general practice-based recruitment strategies aimed at improving LCS participation. Understanding the most effective and equitable strategies is important in the development of successful LCS and ensuring individuals at the greatest risk can participate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\" 64\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13767.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13767.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺癌是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因。尽管如此,与已建立的癌症筛查计划相比,使用低剂量CT进行肺癌筛查(LCS)的接受程度仍低得多。此外,那些患病风险较高的人最不可能参与筛查,包括目前的吸烟者和那些经历社会经济剥夺的人。全科医生(视地点而定,可称为初级保健或家庭医学)通过确定合格个人、克服参与障碍和促进共同决策,在筛查方面发挥着至关重要的作用。鉴于参与率低,重要的是要了解,如果有的话,来自一般做法的哪些战略可以提高国家方案的效力。目的评估和量化在全科实践中实施的策略的效果,以增加LCS的参与。方法在可能的情况下,按照PRISMA报告指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO国际临床试验注册平台。所有报告基于一般实践和LCS结果的招募策略的随机试验、非随机研究和定量描述性研究都将符合条件。筛选和数据提取将由两名审稿人独立进行。偏倚风险和结果的总体确定性将分别使用MMAT和GRADE工具进行评估。干预措施描述和复制模板(TIDieR)清单将用于数据提取,行为改变技术(BCT)分类法将用于干预措施组成部分的数据分析。本综述将提供旨在提高LCS参与的最有效的基于一般实践的招聘策略的数据。了解最有效和公平的策略对于成功发展LCS和确保风险最大的个人能够参与至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
General practice focussed strategies to increase participation in lung cancer screening – a systematic review protocol
Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite this, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose CT is substantially low in comparison to established cancer screening programmes. Additionally, those at higher risk of the disease are the least likely to participate in screening, including current smokers and those experiencing socioeconomic deprivation. General practice (which may be referred to as primary care or family medicine depending on location) plays a vital role in screening through the identification of eligible individuals, overcoming participation barriers, and facilitating shared decision-making. Given the low rates of participation, it is important to understand which, if any, strategies from general practice could improve the effectiveness of a national programme. Objectives To assess and quantify the effects of strategies implemented in general practice to increase participation in LCS. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis, where possible, will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be conducted. All randomised trials, non-randomised studies, and quantitative descriptive studies that report recruitment strategies based in general practice and LCS outcomes will be eligible. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias and overall certainty of findings will be assessed using the MMAT and GRADE tools, respectively. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist will be used for data extraction and the Behavioural Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy for data analysis of the components of interventions. Conclusion This review will provide data on the most effective general practice-based recruitment strategies aimed at improving LCS participation. Understanding the most effective and equitable strategies is important in the development of successful LCS and ensuring individuals at the greatest risk can participate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
A study to explore the role of a low threshold, fitness focussed physical rehabilitation intervention with protein supplementation to target physical function and frailty in people with problematic substance use and homelessness: protocol for a single-arm pre-post intervention study. Protocol for a systematic search and critical discourse analysis of research on national HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis programmes among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Development and Initial Implementation of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy in a Non-regulated Trial: a research note from the ReStOre II Trial. The emerging role of a Stroke Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) in Early Supported Discharged: Developing a pathway for stroke nursing for secondary prevention in the community.  A scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1