Priya Patel, Benjamin Jacob, Barbara Clyne, Alice Le Bonniec, Samantha L. Quaife, Stephen H. Bradley, Patrick Redmond
{"title":"提高肺癌筛查参与率的全科医生策略--系统性审查方案","authors":"Priya Patel, Benjamin Jacob, Barbara Clyne, Alice Le Bonniec, Samantha L. Quaife, Stephen H. Bradley, Patrick Redmond","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13767.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite this, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose CT is substantially low in comparison to established cancer screening programmes. Additionally, those at higher risk of the disease are the least likely to participate in screening, including current smokers and those experiencing socioeconomic deprivation. General practice (which may be referred to as primary care or family medicine depending on location) plays a vital role in screening through the identification of eligible individuals, overcoming participation barriers, and facilitating shared decision-making. Given the low rates of participation, it is important to understand which, if any, strategies from general practice could improve the effectiveness of a national programme. Objectives To assess and quantify the effects of strategies implemented in general practice to increase participation in LCS. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis, where possible, will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be conducted. All randomised trials, non-randomised studies, and quantitative descriptive studies that report recruitment strategies based in general practice and LCS outcomes will be eligible. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias and overall certainty of findings will be assessed using the MMAT and GRADE tools, respectively. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist will be used for data extraction and the Behavioural Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy for data analysis of the components of interventions. Conclusion This review will provide data on the most effective general practice-based recruitment strategies aimed at improving LCS participation. Understanding the most effective and equitable strategies is important in the development of successful LCS and ensuring individuals at the greatest risk can participate.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":" 64","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General practice focussed strategies to increase participation in lung cancer screening – a systematic review protocol\",\"authors\":\"Priya Patel, Benjamin Jacob, Barbara Clyne, Alice Le Bonniec, Samantha L. Quaife, Stephen H. Bradley, Patrick Redmond\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13767.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite this, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose CT is substantially low in comparison to established cancer screening programmes. Additionally, those at higher risk of the disease are the least likely to participate in screening, including current smokers and those experiencing socioeconomic deprivation. General practice (which may be referred to as primary care or family medicine depending on location) plays a vital role in screening through the identification of eligible individuals, overcoming participation barriers, and facilitating shared decision-making. Given the low rates of participation, it is important to understand which, if any, strategies from general practice could improve the effectiveness of a national programme. Objectives To assess and quantify the effects of strategies implemented in general practice to increase participation in LCS. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis, where possible, will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be conducted. All randomised trials, non-randomised studies, and quantitative descriptive studies that report recruitment strategies based in general practice and LCS outcomes will be eligible. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias and overall certainty of findings will be assessed using the MMAT and GRADE tools, respectively. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist will be used for data extraction and the Behavioural Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy for data analysis of the components of interventions. Conclusion This review will provide data on the most effective general practice-based recruitment strategies aimed at improving LCS participation. Understanding the most effective and equitable strategies is important in the development of successful LCS and ensuring individuals at the greatest risk can participate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\" 64\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13767.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13767.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肺癌是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因。尽管如此,与已建立的癌症筛查计划相比,使用低剂量CT进行肺癌筛查(LCS)的接受程度仍低得多。此外,那些患病风险较高的人最不可能参与筛查,包括目前的吸烟者和那些经历社会经济剥夺的人。全科医生(视地点而定,可称为初级保健或家庭医学)通过确定合格个人、克服参与障碍和促进共同决策,在筛查方面发挥着至关重要的作用。鉴于参与率低,重要的是要了解,如果有的话,来自一般做法的哪些战略可以提高国家方案的效力。目的评估和量化在全科实践中实施的策略的效果,以增加LCS的参与。方法在可能的情况下,按照PRISMA报告指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO国际临床试验注册平台。所有报告基于一般实践和LCS结果的招募策略的随机试验、非随机研究和定量描述性研究都将符合条件。筛选和数据提取将由两名审稿人独立进行。偏倚风险和结果的总体确定性将分别使用MMAT和GRADE工具进行评估。干预措施描述和复制模板(TIDieR)清单将用于数据提取,行为改变技术(BCT)分类法将用于干预措施组成部分的数据分析。本综述将提供旨在提高LCS参与的最有效的基于一般实践的招聘策略的数据。了解最有效和公平的策略对于成功发展LCS和确保风险最大的个人能够参与至关重要。
General practice focussed strategies to increase participation in lung cancer screening – a systematic review protocol
Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite this, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose CT is substantially low in comparison to established cancer screening programmes. Additionally, those at higher risk of the disease are the least likely to participate in screening, including current smokers and those experiencing socioeconomic deprivation. General practice (which may be referred to as primary care or family medicine depending on location) plays a vital role in screening through the identification of eligible individuals, overcoming participation barriers, and facilitating shared decision-making. Given the low rates of participation, it is important to understand which, if any, strategies from general practice could improve the effectiveness of a national programme. Objectives To assess and quantify the effects of strategies implemented in general practice to increase participation in LCS. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis, where possible, will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be conducted. All randomised trials, non-randomised studies, and quantitative descriptive studies that report recruitment strategies based in general practice and LCS outcomes will be eligible. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias and overall certainty of findings will be assessed using the MMAT and GRADE tools, respectively. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist will be used for data extraction and the Behavioural Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy for data analysis of the components of interventions. Conclusion This review will provide data on the most effective general practice-based recruitment strategies aimed at improving LCS participation. Understanding the most effective and equitable strategies is important in the development of successful LCS and ensuring individuals at the greatest risk can participate.