俄罗斯国家原子能公司(Rosatom State Corporation)各机构为控制计划暴露情况而使用的光子和中子辐射剂量测量系统的比较

O.A. Kochetkov, E.Yu. Tarasova, S.M. Shinkarev, E.A. Rumyantsev
{"title":"俄罗斯国家原子能公司(Rosatom State Corporation)各机构为控制计划暴露情况而使用的光子和中子辐射剂量测量系统的比较","authors":"O.A. Kochetkov, E.Yu. Tarasova, S.M. Shinkarev, E.A. Rumyantsev","doi":"10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-6-118-124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Using the example of reviewing and discussing the results of comparison tests of dosimetric systems of gamma and neutron radiation used in organizations of the State Corporation “Rosatom”, to assess the current state of reliability of monitoring the planned exposure of workers in fields of mixed gamma-neutron radiation using the considered dosimetric systems in order to produce recommendations for corrective actions to ensure a unified approach to conduct individual dosimetric control of external exposure. Results: All measuring instruments for individual dose equivalent of photon and neutron radiation, presented in comparison tests, comply with up-to-date requirements for individual dosimetric control systems. All measuring instruments confirmed their measuring capabilities, showed satisfactory quality of measurement results and the absence of a systematic bias in the measurement results. Analysis of the results of measuring the individual dose equivalent of neutron radiation showed that problems affecting the quality of the results obtained were identified in the considered instruments of measuring personal dose equivalent. The following factors might be the sources of problems: lack of knowledge about the real characteristics of radiation fields (spectral characteristics, radiation direction, etc.) at workplaces; insufficient research of the method used for measuring neutron radiation under real conditions (technical and metrological characteristics and features of the individual dosimeters used); failure to take into account the weighing coefficients for neutrons of various energies when measuring instruments are calibrated and when real measurements are conducted. Conclusion: It is necessary to organize and conduct investigations of the metrological characteristics of the measuring instrument that are used under conditions typical for a specific radiation object. After finishing these experimental studies, it is recommended to test the methodology with an analysis of the compliance of the accuracy indicators with the requirements of the relevant guidelines. In order to solve the problem of a lack of knowledge about the real characteristics of radiation fields, radiation safety services of organizations are recommended to organize and conduct research aimed at studying such characteristics using radiometric and spectrometric methods, experimental modeling of the process of personnel exposure using anthropomorphic phantoms and determining correction factors for the individual dosimeters used.","PeriodicalId":37358,"journal":{"name":"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety","volume":" 91","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Photon and Neutron Radiation Dosimetric Systems Used in Organizations of Rosatom State Corporation for Control in A Planned Exposure Situation\",\"authors\":\"O.A. Kochetkov, E.Yu. Tarasova, S.M. Shinkarev, E.A. Rumyantsev\",\"doi\":\"10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-6-118-124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Using the example of reviewing and discussing the results of comparison tests of dosimetric systems of gamma and neutron radiation used in organizations of the State Corporation “Rosatom”, to assess the current state of reliability of monitoring the planned exposure of workers in fields of mixed gamma-neutron radiation using the considered dosimetric systems in order to produce recommendations for corrective actions to ensure a unified approach to conduct individual dosimetric control of external exposure. Results: All measuring instruments for individual dose equivalent of photon and neutron radiation, presented in comparison tests, comply with up-to-date requirements for individual dosimetric control systems. All measuring instruments confirmed their measuring capabilities, showed satisfactory quality of measurement results and the absence of a systematic bias in the measurement results. Analysis of the results of measuring the individual dose equivalent of neutron radiation showed that problems affecting the quality of the results obtained were identified in the considered instruments of measuring personal dose equivalent. The following factors might be the sources of problems: lack of knowledge about the real characteristics of radiation fields (spectral characteristics, radiation direction, etc.) at workplaces; insufficient research of the method used for measuring neutron radiation under real conditions (technical and metrological characteristics and features of the individual dosimeters used); failure to take into account the weighing coefficients for neutrons of various energies when measuring instruments are calibrated and when real measurements are conducted. Conclusion: It is necessary to organize and conduct investigations of the metrological characteristics of the measuring instrument that are used under conditions typical for a specific radiation object. After finishing these experimental studies, it is recommended to test the methodology with an analysis of the compliance of the accuracy indicators with the requirements of the relevant guidelines. In order to solve the problem of a lack of knowledge about the real characteristics of radiation fields, radiation safety services of organizations are recommended to organize and conduct research aimed at studying such characteristics using radiometric and spectrometric methods, experimental modeling of the process of personnel exposure using anthropomorphic phantoms and determining correction factors for the individual dosimeters used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety\",\"volume\":\" 91\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-6-118-124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-6-118-124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以审查和讨论国家"俄罗斯国家原子能公司"各组织使用的伽马辐射和中子辐射剂量计量系统的比较试验结果为例,评估使用所考虑的剂量学系统监测混合伽马-中子辐射领域工作人员计划照射的可靠性现状,以便提出纠正措施建议,以确保采用统一的方法对外部照射进行个人剂量学控制。结果:在比较试验中,所有的光子和中子辐射的剂量当量测量仪器都符合最新的剂量控制系统的要求。所有测量仪器都确认了它们的测量能力,显示了令人满意的测量结果质量,并且测量结果中没有系统偏差。对测量中子辐射个人剂量当量结果的分析表明,在考虑的测量个人剂量当量的仪器中发现了影响所得结果质量的问题。以下因素可能是问题的根源:对工作场所辐射场的真实特征(光谱特征、辐射方向等)缺乏了解;对实际条件下测量中子辐射的方法研究不足(所使用的个别剂量计的技术和计量特性和特征);在校准测量仪器和进行实际测量时,没有考虑到不同能量的中子的称重系数。结论:有必要对特定辐射对象典型条件下使用的测量仪器的计量特性进行组织和研究。在完成这些实验研究后,建议对方法进行检验,分析准确度指标是否符合相关指南的要求。为了解决人们对辐射场的真实特征缺乏了解的问题,建议各组织的辐射安全服务部门组织开展研究,利用辐射学和光谱学方法研究辐射场的真实特征,利用拟人模型对人员照射过程进行实验建模,并确定所使用的个别剂量计的校正系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Photon and Neutron Radiation Dosimetric Systems Used in Organizations of Rosatom State Corporation for Control in A Planned Exposure Situation
Purpose: Using the example of reviewing and discussing the results of comparison tests of dosimetric systems of gamma and neutron radiation used in organizations of the State Corporation “Rosatom”, to assess the current state of reliability of monitoring the planned exposure of workers in fields of mixed gamma-neutron radiation using the considered dosimetric systems in order to produce recommendations for corrective actions to ensure a unified approach to conduct individual dosimetric control of external exposure. Results: All measuring instruments for individual dose equivalent of photon and neutron radiation, presented in comparison tests, comply with up-to-date requirements for individual dosimetric control systems. All measuring instruments confirmed their measuring capabilities, showed satisfactory quality of measurement results and the absence of a systematic bias in the measurement results. Analysis of the results of measuring the individual dose equivalent of neutron radiation showed that problems affecting the quality of the results obtained were identified in the considered instruments of measuring personal dose equivalent. The following factors might be the sources of problems: lack of knowledge about the real characteristics of radiation fields (spectral characteristics, radiation direction, etc.) at workplaces; insufficient research of the method used for measuring neutron radiation under real conditions (technical and metrological characteristics and features of the individual dosimeters used); failure to take into account the weighing coefficients for neutrons of various energies when measuring instruments are calibrated and when real measurements are conducted. Conclusion: It is necessary to organize and conduct investigations of the metrological characteristics of the measuring instrument that are used under conditions typical for a specific radiation object. After finishing these experimental studies, it is recommended to test the methodology with an analysis of the compliance of the accuracy indicators with the requirements of the relevant guidelines. In order to solve the problem of a lack of knowledge about the real characteristics of radiation fields, radiation safety services of organizations are recommended to organize and conduct research aimed at studying such characteristics using radiometric and spectrometric methods, experimental modeling of the process of personnel exposure using anthropomorphic phantoms and determining correction factors for the individual dosimeters used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Radiation Risk of Death from Cardiovascular Diseases among the Liquidators Involved in the Cleaning up of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident – Workers in the Nuclear Industry Sector The Mitochondrial 18 kDa Translocator Protein as a Biomarker of Radiation-Induced Neuroinflammatory In Memory of Radiotoxicologist Yuri Alexandrovich Klassovsky for the 100th Anniversary of his Birth on 01/15/1924–04/27/1982 The Importance of SPECT/CT in Simultaneous Assessment of Calcinosis of Coronary Arteries, Perfusion and Contractile Function of the Myocardium among Men’s with Coronary Heart Disease Study of Clinical, Hematologic and Immunologic Parameters in Assessing the Anti-Radiation Efficacy of the Therapeutic Agent Based on the Microorganism Fusobacterium Necrophorum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1