对减少药品浪费的干预措施进行系统性审查和系统性探索的议定书

Áine Harris, Ryan Jayesinghe, Lorna Bonnici West, Derek Stewart, T. Grimes, Patrick Redmond
{"title":"对减少药品浪费的干预措施进行系统性审查和系统性探索的议定书","authors":"Áine Harris, Ryan Jayesinghe, Lorna Bonnici West, Derek Stewart, T. Grimes, Patrick Redmond","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13800.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction A reduction in medicines wastage is an important objective in promoting appropriate use of finite resources. The objective of this systematic review is to both assess the effectiveness of interventions to reduce medicines wastage, and apply a systems based exploration of the factors affecting implementation of interventions. Methods A systematic review will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches will be performed in Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Medline, PubMed, Science Citation Index, PsycInfo, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, grey literature, and trials registries. Data extraction and critical appraisal will be completed independently by two reviewers. If studies are sufficiently homogenous in terms of design and comparators, we will conduct a meta-analysis. Where this is not possible, we will provide a narrative synthesis of results grouping studies with similar interventions together. The barriers and enablers of the described interventions will then be analysed using the Systems Engineering Initiative in Patient Safety (SEIPS 101) model. Conclusions This review will describe the effectiveness of interventions to reduce medicines wastage and issues associated with their implementation in order to inform policy development and intervention implementation in the future. This will have the potential to reduce both the economic and environmental burden of medicines wastage on the health service. PROSPERO registration CRD42022335848 (12/06/2022)","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":" 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for a systematic review and systems-based exploration of interventions to reduce medicines wastage\",\"authors\":\"Áine Harris, Ryan Jayesinghe, Lorna Bonnici West, Derek Stewart, T. Grimes, Patrick Redmond\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13800.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction A reduction in medicines wastage is an important objective in promoting appropriate use of finite resources. The objective of this systematic review is to both assess the effectiveness of interventions to reduce medicines wastage, and apply a systems based exploration of the factors affecting implementation of interventions. Methods A systematic review will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches will be performed in Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Medline, PubMed, Science Citation Index, PsycInfo, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, grey literature, and trials registries. Data extraction and critical appraisal will be completed independently by two reviewers. If studies are sufficiently homogenous in terms of design and comparators, we will conduct a meta-analysis. Where this is not possible, we will provide a narrative synthesis of results grouping studies with similar interventions together. The barriers and enablers of the described interventions will then be analysed using the Systems Engineering Initiative in Patient Safety (SEIPS 101) model. Conclusions This review will describe the effectiveness of interventions to reduce medicines wastage and issues associated with their implementation in order to inform policy development and intervention implementation in the future. This will have the potential to reduce both the economic and environmental burden of medicines wastage on the health service. PROSPERO registration CRD42022335848 (12/06/2022)\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\" 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13800.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13800.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

减少药品浪费是促进合理利用有限资源的一个重要目标。本系统综述的目的是评估减少药物浪费的干预措施的有效性,并对影响干预措施实施的因素进行基于系统的探索。方法按照PRISMA报告指南进行系统评价。检索将在护理和联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Embase、Medline、PubMed、科学引文索引、PsycInfo、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆、灰色文献和试验注册中进行。数据提取和关键评估将由两名审稿人独立完成。如果研究在设计和比较物方面具有足够的同质性,我们将进行荟萃分析。如果这是不可能的,我们将提供一个叙述性的综合结果,将具有类似干预措施的研究分组在一起。然后将使用患者安全系统工程计划(SEIPS 101)模型分析上述干预措施的障碍和促成因素。本综述将描述减少药物浪费的干预措施的有效性及其实施相关问题,以便为未来的政策制定和干预措施实施提供信息。这将有可能减轻医药浪费给卫生服务造成的经济和环境负担。普洛斯彼罗注册编号42022335848 (12/06/2022)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protocol for a systematic review and systems-based exploration of interventions to reduce medicines wastage
Introduction A reduction in medicines wastage is an important objective in promoting appropriate use of finite resources. The objective of this systematic review is to both assess the effectiveness of interventions to reduce medicines wastage, and apply a systems based exploration of the factors affecting implementation of interventions. Methods A systematic review will be conducted following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Searches will be performed in Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Medline, PubMed, Science Citation Index, PsycInfo, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, grey literature, and trials registries. Data extraction and critical appraisal will be completed independently by two reviewers. If studies are sufficiently homogenous in terms of design and comparators, we will conduct a meta-analysis. Where this is not possible, we will provide a narrative synthesis of results grouping studies with similar interventions together. The barriers and enablers of the described interventions will then be analysed using the Systems Engineering Initiative in Patient Safety (SEIPS 101) model. Conclusions This review will describe the effectiveness of interventions to reduce medicines wastage and issues associated with their implementation in order to inform policy development and intervention implementation in the future. This will have the potential to reduce both the economic and environmental burden of medicines wastage on the health service. PROSPERO registration CRD42022335848 (12/06/2022)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
A study to explore the role of a low threshold, fitness focussed physical rehabilitation intervention with protein supplementation to target physical function and frailty in people with problematic substance use and homelessness: protocol for a single-arm pre-post intervention study. Protocol for a systematic search and critical discourse analysis of research on national HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis programmes among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Development and Initial Implementation of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy in a Non-regulated Trial: a research note from the ReStOre II Trial. The emerging role of a Stroke Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) in Early Supported Discharged: Developing a pathway for stroke nursing for secondary prevention in the community.  A scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1