实现记忆经济:确定记忆的物质条件

IF 1.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Memory Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1177/17506980231202339
Daniel Palacios González
{"title":"实现记忆经济:确定记忆的物质条件","authors":"Daniel Palacios González","doi":"10.1177/17506980231202339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following proposes a reframing of approaches to Memory Studies from a materialist perspective. Memory Studies emerged simultaneously with the decline of materialist theories and political economy in historical and cultural studies. Despite attempts to generate alternative genealogies and methodological updates, materialism and political economy have been omitted from the study of memory. Several possibilities to define frameworks for future work on memory will be explored here. First, working on memory as part of a mode of production; second, understanding memory as a field that organises internal hierarchies; and third, defining memory as an ideology that ensures the reproduction of the mode of production. This theoretical proposal is supported by fieldwork and experience in the study of memory practices and policies related to the Spanish Civil War and Francisco Franco’s Dictatorship.","PeriodicalId":47104,"journal":{"name":"Memory Studies","volume":"23 40","pages":"1452 - 1465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an economy of memory: Defining material conditions of remembrance\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Palacios González\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17506980231202339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following proposes a reframing of approaches to Memory Studies from a materialist perspective. Memory Studies emerged simultaneously with the decline of materialist theories and political economy in historical and cultural studies. Despite attempts to generate alternative genealogies and methodological updates, materialism and political economy have been omitted from the study of memory. Several possibilities to define frameworks for future work on memory will be explored here. First, working on memory as part of a mode of production; second, understanding memory as a field that organises internal hierarchies; and third, defining memory as an ideology that ensures the reproduction of the mode of production. This theoretical proposal is supported by fieldwork and experience in the study of memory practices and policies related to the Spanish Civil War and Francisco Franco’s Dictatorship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memory Studies\",\"volume\":\"23 40\",\"pages\":\"1452 - 1465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memory Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231202339\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231202339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下面从唯物主义的角度提出记忆研究方法的重构。记忆研究是与唯物主义理论和政治经济学在历史文化研究中的衰落同时出现的。尽管试图产生替代谱系和方法论更新,唯物主义和政治经济学已经从记忆的研究中被忽略。这里将探讨为未来的内存工作定义框架的几种可能性。首先,将记忆作为生产模式的一部分;第二,将内存理解为组织内部层次结构的领域;第三,将记忆定义为一种确保生产方式再生产的意识形态。这一理论建议得到了与西班牙内战和弗朗西斯科·佛朗哥独裁统治有关的记忆实践和政策研究的实地调查和经验的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards an economy of memory: Defining material conditions of remembrance
The following proposes a reframing of approaches to Memory Studies from a materialist perspective. Memory Studies emerged simultaneously with the decline of materialist theories and political economy in historical and cultural studies. Despite attempts to generate alternative genealogies and methodological updates, materialism and political economy have been omitted from the study of memory. Several possibilities to define frameworks for future work on memory will be explored here. First, working on memory as part of a mode of production; second, understanding memory as a field that organises internal hierarchies; and third, defining memory as an ideology that ensures the reproduction of the mode of production. This theoretical proposal is supported by fieldwork and experience in the study of memory practices and policies related to the Spanish Civil War and Francisco Franco’s Dictatorship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memory Studies
Memory Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Memory Studies is an international peer reviewed journal. Memory Studies affords recognition, form, and direction to work in this nascent field, and provides a critical forum for dialogue and debate on the theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues central to a collaborative understanding of memory today. Memory Studies examines the social, cultural, cognitive, political and technological shifts affecting how, what and why individuals, groups and societies remember, and forget. The journal responds to and seeks to shape public and academic discourse on the nature, manipulation, and contestation of memory in the contemporary era.
期刊最新文献
My body my choice: The hostile appropriation of feminist cultural memory in American anti-vaccine movements. Commodification anxiety and the memory of Turkish revolutionary Deniz Gezmiş. Remembering activism: Means and ends. Solidarity: Memory work, periodicals and the protest lexicon in the long 1960s. Migrants, transcultural memory and World War I commemoration in post-conflict Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1