Vijender Singh, Roshan F. Sutar, Suruchi Gupta, Abhijit P. Pakhare, A. Kokane, B. A. Aravind, G. Gururaj, Mathew Varghese, V. Benegal, Girish N. Rao
{"title":"印度中央邦精神疾病对残疾和社会经济影响的研究","authors":"Vijender Singh, Roshan F. Sutar, Suruchi Gupta, Abhijit P. Pakhare, A. Kokane, B. A. Aravind, G. Gururaj, Mathew Varghese, V. Benegal, Girish N. Rao","doi":"10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_841_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Disability associated with mental illness has a disproportionate impact on the work, social, and family responsibilities of an individual toward society. The evidence for disability in mental illnesses would help the clinician, caregivers, policymakers, and various stakeholders to come up with sustainable solutions not only to help fill the existing gaps in care but also to develop new avenues as per the specific needs of the population of Madhya Pradesh (MP).\n \n \n \n To estimate the burden of disability related to mental illnesses in the state of MP.\n \n \n \n A multi-site cross-sectional study was conducted in 2015–16 as part of National Mental Health Survey among adults above 18 years of age. Samples were selected using multi-stage, stratified, random cluster sampling based on probability proportionate to size. Six tehsils with one urban metro out of four districts from a total of 50 districts were selected in the state of MP. The Sheehan Disability Scale and socio-economic impact of illness (from selected questions from WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0) were used to assess mental morbidity and the subjective reporting of disability.\n \n \n \n The weighted prevalence of disability (n = 1011) was found as 10.2%, 13.1%, and 13.9%, respectively, in work/school, social life, and family/home domains. The weighted prevalence of moderate to extreme disability in the same domains was, respectively, 5.1%, 6.7%, and 7.3%. The presence of common mental disorders (CMDs) increases the odds of self-reported disability in work [odds ratio (OR) 2.48, 95% CI 1.35 to 4.59], social life (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.50 to 5.07), and family domains (OR 3.03, 95% CI1.62 to 5.74). When combined with common mental disorders, tobacco use disorder further escalates the odds of self-reported disability in all three domains [OR 7.10, confidence interval (CI) 3.15 to 16.37; 4.93, CI 2.19 to 11.28; and 7.10, CI 2.78 to 19.25]. Currently, non-working persons had a higher disability in social life and family life domains (P = 0.003 and P = 0.021), respectively.\n \n \n \n We report a substantial magnitude of disability in social, work, and family life domains. Participants having CMDs, female gender, and those non-working had more disabilities and would require targeted interventions.\n","PeriodicalId":13345,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of disability and socio-economic impact of mental morbidities from the state of Madhya Pradesh, India\",\"authors\":\"Vijender Singh, Roshan F. Sutar, Suruchi Gupta, Abhijit P. Pakhare, A. Kokane, B. A. Aravind, G. Gururaj, Mathew Varghese, V. Benegal, Girish N. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_841_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Disability associated with mental illness has a disproportionate impact on the work, social, and family responsibilities of an individual toward society. The evidence for disability in mental illnesses would help the clinician, caregivers, policymakers, and various stakeholders to come up with sustainable solutions not only to help fill the existing gaps in care but also to develop new avenues as per the specific needs of the population of Madhya Pradesh (MP).\\n \\n \\n \\n To estimate the burden of disability related to mental illnesses in the state of MP.\\n \\n \\n \\n A multi-site cross-sectional study was conducted in 2015–16 as part of National Mental Health Survey among adults above 18 years of age. Samples were selected using multi-stage, stratified, random cluster sampling based on probability proportionate to size. Six tehsils with one urban metro out of four districts from a total of 50 districts were selected in the state of MP. The Sheehan Disability Scale and socio-economic impact of illness (from selected questions from WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0) were used to assess mental morbidity and the subjective reporting of disability.\\n \\n \\n \\n The weighted prevalence of disability (n = 1011) was found as 10.2%, 13.1%, and 13.9%, respectively, in work/school, social life, and family/home domains. The weighted prevalence of moderate to extreme disability in the same domains was, respectively, 5.1%, 6.7%, and 7.3%. The presence of common mental disorders (CMDs) increases the odds of self-reported disability in work [odds ratio (OR) 2.48, 95% CI 1.35 to 4.59], social life (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.50 to 5.07), and family domains (OR 3.03, 95% CI1.62 to 5.74). When combined with common mental disorders, tobacco use disorder further escalates the odds of self-reported disability in all three domains [OR 7.10, confidence interval (CI) 3.15 to 16.37; 4.93, CI 2.19 to 11.28; and 7.10, CI 2.78 to 19.25]. Currently, non-working persons had a higher disability in social life and family life domains (P = 0.003 and P = 0.021), respectively.\\n \\n \\n \\n We report a substantial magnitude of disability in social, work, and family life domains. Participants having CMDs, female gender, and those non-working had more disabilities and would require targeted interventions.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_841_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_841_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
与精神疾病相关的残疾对个人对社会的工作、社会和家庭责任有不成比例的影响。精神疾病致残的证据将有助于临床医生、护理人员、政策制定者和各种利益相关者提出可持续的解决方案,不仅有助于填补现有的护理空白,还可以根据中央邦(MP)人口的具体需求开发新的途径。估计MP州与精神疾病相关的残疾负担。作为全国18岁以上成年人心理健康调查的一部分,2015-16年进行了一项多地点横断面研究。样本采用基于概率与大小成比例的多阶段分层随机聚类抽样。中央邦从总共50个选区的4个选区中选出了6个拥有城市地铁的选区。使用Sheehan残疾量表和疾病的社会经济影响(来自世卫组织残疾评估表-2.0的选定问题)来评估精神发病率和残疾的主观报告。在工作/学校、社会生活和家庭/家庭领域,加权残疾患病率(n = 1011)分别为10.2%、13.1%和13.9%。相同领域中中度至重度残疾的加权患病率分别为5.1%、6.7%和7.3%。常见精神障碍(cmd)的存在增加了工作中自我报告残疾的几率[比值比(OR) 2.48, 95% CI 1.35至4.59],社会生活(OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.50至5.07)和家庭领域(OR 3.03, 95% CI1.62至5.74)。当与常见精神障碍合并时,烟草使用障碍进一步增加了所有三个领域中自我报告残疾的几率[OR 7.10,置信区间(CI) 3.15至16.37;4.93, CI 2.19 ~ 11.28;7.10, CI 2.78 ~ 19.25]。目前,非工作人员在社会生活和家庭生活领域的残疾程度较高(P = 0.003和P = 0.021)。我们报告了社会、工作和家庭生活领域中大量的残疾。患有慢性疾病、女性和非工作的参与者有更多的残疾,需要有针对性的干预。
A study of disability and socio-economic impact of mental morbidities from the state of Madhya Pradesh, India
Disability associated with mental illness has a disproportionate impact on the work, social, and family responsibilities of an individual toward society. The evidence for disability in mental illnesses would help the clinician, caregivers, policymakers, and various stakeholders to come up with sustainable solutions not only to help fill the existing gaps in care but also to develop new avenues as per the specific needs of the population of Madhya Pradesh (MP).
To estimate the burden of disability related to mental illnesses in the state of MP.
A multi-site cross-sectional study was conducted in 2015–16 as part of National Mental Health Survey among adults above 18 years of age. Samples were selected using multi-stage, stratified, random cluster sampling based on probability proportionate to size. Six tehsils with one urban metro out of four districts from a total of 50 districts were selected in the state of MP. The Sheehan Disability Scale and socio-economic impact of illness (from selected questions from WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0) were used to assess mental morbidity and the subjective reporting of disability.
The weighted prevalence of disability (n = 1011) was found as 10.2%, 13.1%, and 13.9%, respectively, in work/school, social life, and family/home domains. The weighted prevalence of moderate to extreme disability in the same domains was, respectively, 5.1%, 6.7%, and 7.3%. The presence of common mental disorders (CMDs) increases the odds of self-reported disability in work [odds ratio (OR) 2.48, 95% CI 1.35 to 4.59], social life (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.50 to 5.07), and family domains (OR 3.03, 95% CI1.62 to 5.74). When combined with common mental disorders, tobacco use disorder further escalates the odds of self-reported disability in all three domains [OR 7.10, confidence interval (CI) 3.15 to 16.37; 4.93, CI 2.19 to 11.28; and 7.10, CI 2.78 to 19.25]. Currently, non-working persons had a higher disability in social life and family life domains (P = 0.003 and P = 0.021), respectively.
We report a substantial magnitude of disability in social, work, and family life domains. Participants having CMDs, female gender, and those non-working had more disabilities and would require targeted interventions.
期刊介绍:
The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (ISSN 0019-5545), is an official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society. It is published Bimonthly with one additional supplement (total 5 issues). The IJP publishes original work in all the fields of psychiatry. All papers are peer-reviewed before publication.
The issues are published Bimonthly. An additional supplement is also published annually. Articles can be submitted online from www.journalonweb.com . The journal provides immediate free access to all the published articles. The journal does not charge the authors for submission, processing or publication of the articles.