三维打印聚合物和聚合物复合材料的产品、工艺、属性和性能(PPPP)关系:数值和实验分析

IF 9.9 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.12.001
Ans Al Rashid, Shoukat Alim Khan, Muammer Koç
{"title":"三维打印聚合物和聚合物复合材料的产品、工艺、属性和性能(PPPP)关系:数值和实验分析","authors":"Ans Al Rashid,&nbsp;Shoukat Alim Khan,&nbsp;Muammer Koç","doi":"10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the external and internal factors during an additive manufacturing (AM) process is crucial, as they can significantly affect the final product's performance. Efforts have been made to unwind the product, process, property, and performance (PPPP) relationships. The conventional experimental approaches can lead to boundless runs, resulting in exorbitant costs for research and development. Hence, developing, adapting, and validating numerical models is essential to achieving the desired performance of 3D-printed products with lesser resource utilization. In this study, numerical and experimental techniques were used to perform the PPPP relationship assessment on material extrusion 3D-printed parts. Three infill designs (rectangular, triangular, and hexagonal), with layer heights (0.1 mm, 0.125 mm, and 0.2 mm), and three different materials (carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide-6 (PA6-CF), polyamide-6 (PA6), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)), were selected for the investigation. Taguchi's design of experiments (DOE) method was used to limit the number of numerical simulations and experimental runs. A thermomechanical numerical model was utilized to perform the material extrusion process simulations and mechanical performance prediction of the specimens. Subsequently, the samples were 3D-printed and tested mechanically to validate the numerical simulation results. The dimensional, distortion, and mechanical analysis performed on numerical simulation results agreed well with the experimental observations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7186,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 245-254"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542504823000751/pdfft?md5=5d523b7c53007b735720b50d9fbd9a05&pid=1-s2.0-S2542504823000751-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Product, process, property, and performance (PPPP) relationship of 3D-Printed polymers and polymer composites: Numerical and experimental analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ans Al Rashid,&nbsp;Shoukat Alim Khan,&nbsp;Muammer Koç\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding the external and internal factors during an additive manufacturing (AM) process is crucial, as they can significantly affect the final product's performance. Efforts have been made to unwind the product, process, property, and performance (PPPP) relationships. The conventional experimental approaches can lead to boundless runs, resulting in exorbitant costs for research and development. Hence, developing, adapting, and validating numerical models is essential to achieving the desired performance of 3D-printed products with lesser resource utilization. In this study, numerical and experimental techniques were used to perform the PPPP relationship assessment on material extrusion 3D-printed parts. Three infill designs (rectangular, triangular, and hexagonal), with layer heights (0.1 mm, 0.125 mm, and 0.2 mm), and three different materials (carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide-6 (PA6-CF), polyamide-6 (PA6), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)), were selected for the investigation. Taguchi's design of experiments (DOE) method was used to limit the number of numerical simulations and experimental runs. A thermomechanical numerical model was utilized to perform the material extrusion process simulations and mechanical performance prediction of the specimens. Subsequently, the samples were 3D-printed and tested mechanically to validate the numerical simulation results. The dimensional, distortion, and mechanical analysis performed on numerical simulation results agreed well with the experimental observations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 245-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542504823000751/pdfft?md5=5d523b7c53007b735720b50d9fbd9a05&pid=1-s2.0-S2542504823000751-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542504823000751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542504823000751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解增材制造(AM)过程中的外部和内部因素至关重要,因为它们会极大地影响最终产品的性能。人们一直在努力理清产品、工艺、属性和性能(PPPP)之间的关系。传统的实验方法可能会导致无限制的运行,从而导致高昂的研发成本。因此,开发、调整和验证数值模型对于以较少的资源利用率实现 3D 打印产品的理想性能至关重要。本研究采用数值和实验技术对材料挤压 3D 打印部件进行 PPPP 关系评估。研究选择了三种填充设计(矩形、三角形和六边形)、层高(0.1 毫米、0.125 毫米和 0.2 毫米)和三种不同材料(碳纤维增强聚酰胺-6(PA6-CF)、聚酰胺-6(PA6)和丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS))。采用田口试验设计法(DOE)限制了数值模拟和试验运行的次数。利用热力学数值模型对材料挤压过程进行模拟,并对试样的机械性能进行预测。随后,对试样进行了 3D 打印和机械测试,以验证数值模拟结果。根据数值模拟结果进行的尺寸、变形和机械分析与实验观察结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Product, process, property, and performance (PPPP) relationship of 3D-Printed polymers and polymer composites: Numerical and experimental analysis

Understanding the external and internal factors during an additive manufacturing (AM) process is crucial, as they can significantly affect the final product's performance. Efforts have been made to unwind the product, process, property, and performance (PPPP) relationships. The conventional experimental approaches can lead to boundless runs, resulting in exorbitant costs for research and development. Hence, developing, adapting, and validating numerical models is essential to achieving the desired performance of 3D-printed products with lesser resource utilization. In this study, numerical and experimental techniques were used to perform the PPPP relationship assessment on material extrusion 3D-printed parts. Three infill designs (rectangular, triangular, and hexagonal), with layer heights (0.1 mm, 0.125 mm, and 0.2 mm), and three different materials (carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide-6 (PA6-CF), polyamide-6 (PA6), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)), were selected for the investigation. Taguchi's design of experiments (DOE) method was used to limit the number of numerical simulations and experimental runs. A thermomechanical numerical model was utilized to perform the material extrusion process simulations and mechanical performance prediction of the specimens. Subsequently, the samples were 3D-printed and tested mechanically to validate the numerical simulation results. The dimensional, distortion, and mechanical analysis performed on numerical simulation results agreed well with the experimental observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research
Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research Materials Science-Polymers and Plastics
CiteScore
26.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
29 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Fire performance durability of flame retardants in polymers and coatings Review of thermal conductivity in epoxy thermosets and composites: Mechanisms, parameters, and filler influences Surface grafting POSS to improve the hydrophobicity and fire safety of polyrotaxane based smart phase change materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1