个人主义、经济自由和影子经济的发展

IF 2.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Systems Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101168
James W. Saunoris
{"title":"个人主义、经济自由和影子经济的发展","authors":"James W. Saunoris","doi":"10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To better understand the relationship between formal institutions, culture, and the size of the shadow economy, this paper considers the impact of pro-market institutions and cultures of individualism, and their interplay, on the size of the shadow economy. Using panel data for 64 countries from 1995 to 2017, the results show that economically free countries that value individualism over collectivism are, on average, associated with smaller shadow economies. Furthermore, the findings reveal that individualistic cultures amplify the effect of formal market-supporting institutions in reducing the size of the shadow economy, and vice versa. In terms of policy guidance, the results of this study suggest that policies would benefit from accounting for culture in promoting pro-market institutions to combat the shadow economy or in transitioning shadow participants to the formal sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51505,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems","volume":"48 1","pages":"Article 101168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualism, economic freedom, and the development of the shadow economy\",\"authors\":\"James W. Saunoris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To better understand the relationship between formal institutions, culture, and the size of the shadow economy, this paper considers the impact of pro-market institutions and cultures of individualism, and their interplay, on the size of the shadow economy. Using panel data for 64 countries from 1995 to 2017, the results show that economically free countries that value individualism over collectivism are, on average, associated with smaller shadow economies. Furthermore, the findings reveal that individualistic cultures amplify the effect of formal market-supporting institutions in reducing the size of the shadow economy, and vice versa. In terms of policy guidance, the results of this study suggest that policies would benefit from accounting for culture in promoting pro-market institutions to combat the shadow economy or in transitioning shadow participants to the formal sector.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Systems\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523001073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939362523001073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了更好地理解正规制度、文化和影子经济规模之间的关系,本文研究了亲市场制度和个人主义文化及其相互作用对影子经济规模的影响。利用 1995 年至 2017 年 64 个国家的面板数据,研究结果表明,重视个人主义而非集体主义的经济自由国家的影子经济规模平均较小。此外,研究结果还显示,个人主义文化会放大正规市场支持机构在缩小影子经济规模方面的作用,反之亦然。就政策指导而言,本研究的结果表明,在促进支持市场的机构打击影子经济或将影子经济参与者过渡到正规部门的过程中,考虑文化因素将使政策受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individualism, economic freedom, and the development of the shadow economy

To better understand the relationship between formal institutions, culture, and the size of the shadow economy, this paper considers the impact of pro-market institutions and cultures of individualism, and their interplay, on the size of the shadow economy. Using panel data for 64 countries from 1995 to 2017, the results show that economically free countries that value individualism over collectivism are, on average, associated with smaller shadow economies. Furthermore, the findings reveal that individualistic cultures amplify the effect of formal market-supporting institutions in reducing the size of the shadow economy, and vice versa. In terms of policy guidance, the results of this study suggest that policies would benefit from accounting for culture in promoting pro-market institutions to combat the shadow economy or in transitioning shadow participants to the formal sector.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Systems
Economic Systems ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Economic Systems is a refereed journal for the analysis of causes and consequences of the significant institutional variety prevailing among developed, developing, and emerging economies, as well as attempts at and proposals for their reform. The journal is open to micro and macro contributions, theoretical as well as empirical, the latter to analyze related topics against the background of country or region-specific experiences. In this respect, Economic Systems retains its long standing interest in the emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe and other former transition economies, but also encourages contributions that cover any part of the world, including Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, or Africa.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comovement and Global Imbalances of Current Accounts Demographic transition and inflation The impact of the heterogenous fiscal policy stance of euro-area member states on ECB monetary policy Environmental protection taxes and green productivity: Evidence from listed companies in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1