Song-Chol Pak, Nam-Chol O, Ryong-Jin Ri, Jong-Song Ro, Pong-Chol Ri
{"title":"碳足迹作为食品环保性能指标的适用性","authors":"Song-Chol Pak, Nam-Chol O, Ryong-Jin Ri, Jong-Song Ro, Pong-Chol Ri","doi":"10.1007/s41742-023-00553-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the past decades, the environmental impact categories have been applied to life cycle assessment of consumer product, but the challenge of applying the impact categories is still posed. Although former studies have screened impact categories/indicators to represent sustainability for environmental performance of products from the existing ones, the practitioners have rarely discussed the challenge within food products. This present study aims to conduct a correlation analysis between life cycle impacts of food products on eight impact categories/indicators with a question of whether Carbon Footprint (CF) expressed as Global Warming Potential (GWP100a) could serve as indicator for environmental performance of food products. 1548 food products from the French database AGRIBALYSE v3.0.1 is employed in the analysis, while eight impact categories/indicators in the CML-IA baseline method are calculated by the openLCA 1.10.3 software. The results show that correlation coefficients between the impact categories/indicators vary in a range of 0.42–0.87. Strong correlations between the CF and the others are found in the whole product category except toxicity-related impact categories, and the correlations could be stronger or weaker depending on the product subcategories. It reveals that, on one hand, the CF could act as proxy for some of the impact indicators in the product categories; on the other hand, the indicator could not serve as a stand-alone indicator to represent the environmental sustainability. The research findings might be used in selecting impact categories/indicators for environmental performance of food products, while screening impact categories/indicators from the existing ones and making a contribution to sustainability assessment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":14121,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of Carbon Footprint as Indicator for Environmental Performance of Food Products\",\"authors\":\"Song-Chol Pak, Nam-Chol O, Ryong-Jin Ri, Jong-Song Ro, Pong-Chol Ri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41742-023-00553-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the past decades, the environmental impact categories have been applied to life cycle assessment of consumer product, but the challenge of applying the impact categories is still posed. Although former studies have screened impact categories/indicators to represent sustainability for environmental performance of products from the existing ones, the practitioners have rarely discussed the challenge within food products. This present study aims to conduct a correlation analysis between life cycle impacts of food products on eight impact categories/indicators with a question of whether Carbon Footprint (CF) expressed as Global Warming Potential (GWP100a) could serve as indicator for environmental performance of food products. 1548 food products from the French database AGRIBALYSE v3.0.1 is employed in the analysis, while eight impact categories/indicators in the CML-IA baseline method are calculated by the openLCA 1.10.3 software. The results show that correlation coefficients between the impact categories/indicators vary in a range of 0.42–0.87. Strong correlations between the CF and the others are found in the whole product category except toxicity-related impact categories, and the correlations could be stronger or weaker depending on the product subcategories. It reveals that, on one hand, the CF could act as proxy for some of the impact indicators in the product categories; on the other hand, the indicator could not serve as a stand-alone indicator to represent the environmental sustainability. The research findings might be used in selecting impact categories/indicators for environmental performance of food products, while screening impact categories/indicators from the existing ones and making a contribution to sustainability assessment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":14121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00553-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00553-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Applicability of Carbon Footprint as Indicator for Environmental Performance of Food Products
In the past decades, the environmental impact categories have been applied to life cycle assessment of consumer product, but the challenge of applying the impact categories is still posed. Although former studies have screened impact categories/indicators to represent sustainability for environmental performance of products from the existing ones, the practitioners have rarely discussed the challenge within food products. This present study aims to conduct a correlation analysis between life cycle impacts of food products on eight impact categories/indicators with a question of whether Carbon Footprint (CF) expressed as Global Warming Potential (GWP100a) could serve as indicator for environmental performance of food products. 1548 food products from the French database AGRIBALYSE v3.0.1 is employed in the analysis, while eight impact categories/indicators in the CML-IA baseline method are calculated by the openLCA 1.10.3 software. The results show that correlation coefficients between the impact categories/indicators vary in a range of 0.42–0.87. Strong correlations between the CF and the others are found in the whole product category except toxicity-related impact categories, and the correlations could be stronger or weaker depending on the product subcategories. It reveals that, on one hand, the CF could act as proxy for some of the impact indicators in the product categories; on the other hand, the indicator could not serve as a stand-alone indicator to represent the environmental sustainability. The research findings might be used in selecting impact categories/indicators for environmental performance of food products, while screening impact categories/indicators from the existing ones and making a contribution to sustainability assessment.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Research is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of environment. In pursuit of these, environmentalist disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. International Journal of Environmental Research publishes original research papers, research notes and reviews across the broad field of environment. These include but are not limited to environmental science, environmental engineering, environmental management and planning and environmental design, urban and regional landscape design and natural disaster management. Thus high quality research papers or reviews dealing with any aspect of environment are welcomed. Papers may be theoretical, interpretative or experimental.