COVID-19 大流行对智障集体之家居民的影响:对马萨诸塞州自我倡导者的包容性定性访谈结果

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1111/jppi.12478
Matthew S. Smith, Anne Fracht, Diana Mairose, Anthony Phillips, Michael Ashley Stein
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行对智障集体之家居民的影响:对马萨诸塞州自我倡导者的包容性定性访谈结果","authors":"Matthew S. Smith,&nbsp;Anne Fracht,&nbsp;Diana Mairose,&nbsp;Anthony Phillips,&nbsp;Michael Ashley Stein","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little research on the experiences of persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been done by persons with ID themselves. Moreover, little research focuses on group home residents with ID, despite the greater risks they faced of COVID-19 transmission and mortality. To address these gaps, researchers with and without ID organized qualitative interviews and a focus group discussion with six group home residents with ID in Massachusetts. Study participants identified as self-advocates and reported feelings of frustration and isolation that at times were exacerbated by community access restrictions imposed by their group homes. All participants described group home staff efforts to keep them physically safe, while some reported lapses that contributed to their risk of contracting COVID-19. None described comparable efforts to address their social and mental health needs. All participants received information about COVID-19 and related precautions from group home staff, but none reported receiving information about heightened risks of contracting COVID-19 while living in group settings. Also, notwithstanding pandemic-related challenges, most participants identified at least one positive change in their lives, either by changing where they lived or worked or by forging new relationships. Participants' perspectives, as presented to researchers with ID, shed unique light on the range of group home residents' pandemic experiences, signal opportunities for interventions addressing social isolation, and underscore the efficacy of inclusive research methods in eliciting information from research participants with ID.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"20 4","pages":"405-414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 pandemic experiences of group home residents with intellectual disabilities: Findings from inclusive, qualitative interviews with self-advocates in Massachusetts\",\"authors\":\"Matthew S. Smith,&nbsp;Anne Fracht,&nbsp;Diana Mairose,&nbsp;Anthony Phillips,&nbsp;Michael Ashley Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jppi.12478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Little research on the experiences of persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been done by persons with ID themselves. Moreover, little research focuses on group home residents with ID, despite the greater risks they faced of COVID-19 transmission and mortality. To address these gaps, researchers with and without ID organized qualitative interviews and a focus group discussion with six group home residents with ID in Massachusetts. Study participants identified as self-advocates and reported feelings of frustration and isolation that at times were exacerbated by community access restrictions imposed by their group homes. All participants described group home staff efforts to keep them physically safe, while some reported lapses that contributed to their risk of contracting COVID-19. None described comparable efforts to address their social and mental health needs. All participants received information about COVID-19 and related precautions from group home staff, but none reported receiving information about heightened risks of contracting COVID-19 while living in group settings. Also, notwithstanding pandemic-related challenges, most participants identified at least one positive change in their lives, either by changing where they lived or worked or by forging new relationships. Participants' perspectives, as presented to researchers with ID, shed unique light on the range of group home residents' pandemic experiences, signal opportunities for interventions addressing social isolation, and underscore the efficacy of inclusive research methods in eliciting information from research participants with ID.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"405-414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12478\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于智障人士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历,智障人士自己所做的研究很少。此外,尽管智障人士面临的 COVID-19 传播和死亡风险更大,但很少有研究关注智障人士集体之家的居民。为了填补这些空白,研究人员与马萨诸塞州的六位智障人士组织了定性访谈和焦点小组讨论。研究参与者自称是自我倡导者,并报告了他们的挫败感和孤独感,这些挫败感和孤独感有时会因集体之家施加的社区准入限制而加剧。所有参与者都描述了疗养院工作人员在保证他们人身安全方面所做的努力,但也有一些人报告说,这些努力的失误导致了他们感染 COVID-19 的风险。没有人描述过在满足他们的社会和心理健康需求方面所做的类似努力。所有参与者都从集体之家的工作人员那里获得了有关 COVID-19 和相关预防措施的信息,但没有人报告说他们在集体生活中获得了有关感染 COVID-19 的更高风险的信息。此外,尽管面临与大流行相关的挑战,但大多数参与者认为他们的生活至少发生了一次积极的变化,或是改变了居住或工作地点,或是建立了新的人际关系。智障研究人员从参与者的角度了解了集体之家居民的各种大流行经历,为解决社会隔离问题的干预措施提供了机会,并强调了包容性研究方法在从智障研究参与者那里获取信息方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 pandemic experiences of group home residents with intellectual disabilities: Findings from inclusive, qualitative interviews with self-advocates in Massachusetts

Little research on the experiences of persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been done by persons with ID themselves. Moreover, little research focuses on group home residents with ID, despite the greater risks they faced of COVID-19 transmission and mortality. To address these gaps, researchers with and without ID organized qualitative interviews and a focus group discussion with six group home residents with ID in Massachusetts. Study participants identified as self-advocates and reported feelings of frustration and isolation that at times were exacerbated by community access restrictions imposed by their group homes. All participants described group home staff efforts to keep them physically safe, while some reported lapses that contributed to their risk of contracting COVID-19. None described comparable efforts to address their social and mental health needs. All participants received information about COVID-19 and related precautions from group home staff, but none reported receiving information about heightened risks of contracting COVID-19 while living in group settings. Also, notwithstanding pandemic-related challenges, most participants identified at least one positive change in their lives, either by changing where they lived or worked or by forging new relationships. Participants' perspectives, as presented to researchers with ID, shed unique light on the range of group home residents' pandemic experiences, signal opportunities for interventions addressing social isolation, and underscore the efficacy of inclusive research methods in eliciting information from research participants with ID.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the UK During COVID-19? Talk-LD and Talk-LD+: A pilot trial of school-based interventions to challenge discrimination and promote inclusion Moving toward a time-based and balanced quality of life Evaluation of an Australian community-based model of care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities undergoing procedures under sedation After us, together with us: Quality of life in adults with disabilities in an inclusive and sustainable future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1