减少应用语言学研究中 "可避免的研究浪费"：医疗保健研究的启示

IF 4 2区文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language Teaching Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1017/s0261444823000411

Talia Isaacs, Hamish Chalmers

{"title":"减少应用语言学研究中 \"可避免的研究浪费\"：医疗保健研究的启示","authors":"Talia Isaacs, Hamish Chalmers","doi":"10.1017/s0261444823000411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores Chalmers and Glasziou's (2009) notion of ‘research waste’ from healthcare research to examine what it can offer the field of applied linguistics. Drawing on examples from both disciplines, we unpack Macleod et al.'s (2014) five research waste categories: (1) asking the wrong research questions, (2) failing to situate new research in the context of existing research, (3) inefficient research regulation/management, (4) failing to disseminate findings, and (5) poor research reporting practices. We advance this typology to help applied linguists identify and reduce avoidable research waste and improve the relevance, quality, and impact of their research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47770,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching","volume":"267 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing ‘avoidable research waste’ in applied linguistics research: Insights from healthcare research\",\"authors\":\"Talia Isaacs, Hamish Chalmers\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0261444823000411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper explores Chalmers and Glasziou's (2009) notion of ‘research waste’ from healthcare research to examine what it can offer the field of applied linguistics. Drawing on examples from both disciplines, we unpack Macleod et al.'s (2014) five research waste categories: (1) asking the wrong research questions, (2) failing to situate new research in the context of existing research, (3) inefficient research regulation/management, (4) failing to disseminate findings, and (5) poor research reporting practices. We advance this typology to help applied linguists identify and reduce avoidable research waste and improve the relevance, quality, and impact of their research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"267 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444823000411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444823000411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了 Chalmers 和 Glasziou（2009 年）在医疗保健研究中提出的 "研究浪费 "概念，以研究其对应用语言学领域的启示。借鉴这两个学科的实例，我们解读了 Macleod 等人（2014 年）提出的五个研究浪费类别：(1) 提出错误的研究问题；(2) 未能将新研究置于现有研究的背景之下；(3) 研究监管/管理效率低下；(4) 未能传播研究结果；(5) 研究报告实践欠佳。我们推进这一类型学，以帮助应用语言学家识别和减少可避免的研究浪费，提高研究的相关性、质量和影响力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Reducing ‘avoidable research waste’ in applied linguistics research: Insights from healthcare research

This paper explores Chalmers and Glasziou's (2009) notion of ‘research waste’ from healthcare research to examine what it can offer the field of applied linguistics. Drawing on examples from both disciplines, we unpack Macleod et al.'s (2014) five research waste categories: (1) asking the wrong research questions, (2) failing to situate new research in the context of existing research, (3) inefficient research regulation/management, (4) failing to disseminate findings, and (5) poor research reporting practices. We advance this typology to help applied linguists identify and reduce avoidable research waste and improve the relevance, quality, and impact of their research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Language Teaching Multiple-

CiteScore

7.10

自引率

2.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Language Teaching is the essential research resource for language professionals providing a rich and expert overview of research in the field of second-language teaching and learning. It offers critical survey articles of recent research on specific topics, second and foreign languages and countries, and invites original research articles reporting on replication studies and meta-analyses. The journal also includes regional surveys of outstanding doctoral dissertations, topic-based research timelines, theme-based research agendas, recent plenary conference speeches, and research-in-progress reports. A thorough peer-reviewing procedure applies to both the commissioned and the unsolicited articles.