{"title":"基督教与古代晚期的男子气概之争:卡帕多西亚教父与男性修辞》,Nathan D. Howard 著(评论)","authors":"Richard Flower","doi":"10.1353/earl.2023.a915045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity</em> by Nathan D. Howard <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Richard Flower </li> </ul> Nathan D. Howard <em>Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity</em> Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023 Pp. xvi + 338. $120.00. <p>When the emperor Julian's relationship with Antioch soured during his stay there on his way to Persia, his response was characteristically idiosyncratic: he penned his <em>Misopogon</em>, or <em>Beard Hater</em>, and had it posted up publicly for all to see. In this incredibly sarcastic treatise, he issued a mock apology for his appearance, including his philosophical beard and shaggy chest-hair, contrasting it with the depilated bodies of the Antiochenes, which were \"smoother than women\" (346A). He similarly compared his own austere, bookish lifestyle with the city's love of luxury, with excessive eating, drinking, dancing, and theater-going. Moreover, Julian claimed that his devotion to <em>paideia</em> and \"manliness\" (ἀνδρεία) in resisting desires were instilled during his youth by his tutor Mardonius, who was both a Scythian barbarian and a eunuch. In a reversal of expectations, Mardonius understood proper masculinity much better than the so-called \"men\" of Antioch.</p> <p>Nathan D. Howard's book examines the deployment of similar discourse by three of Julian's Christian contemporaries, the \"Cappadocian Fathers\" Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus. Despite being vehemently opposed to the pagan emperor, the trio enjoyed the same elite educational background as him and were keen to present themselves (and other figures they approved of) as <em>pepaideumenoi</em>, paradigmatic examples of cultured, aristocratic men who formed the ruling class of the later Roman empire. Howard therefore situates these bishops firmly within a classical tradition of constructing the ideal Greek man, while also demonstrating some distinctively Christian elements of their rhetoric, most notably in the celebration of asceticism, the incorporation of biblical <em>exempla</em>, and the deployment of these ideas for invective against enemies of Nicene theology, especially \"Heterousian\" heretics. The substantial Introduction establishes important context, exploring a wealth of different factors involved in the characterization of elite men during the preceding centuries. Howard focuses in particular on the agonistic culture of public oratory and performance during the \"Second Sophistic,\" drawing on studies of the construction of masculinity and <em>aretē</em> (\"excellence\") in this period, especially the work of Maud Gleason and Erik Gunderson. The Introduction does, however, range much more widely, examining scholarship on an impressive array of topics, including civic euergetism, identity theory, Christian ideas of \"transcendent masculinity,\" and approaches to letter collections and hagiography.</p> <p>The first two chapters both employ the concept of the <em>agōn</em> (\"contest\") and its role in proving and displaying masculinity. Chapter One engages particularly closely with Second Sophistic ideas about the role of the <em>agōn</em> in displaying <em>aretē</em>, but argues that, in the letters of the Cappadocians, the focus was less on defeating and \"emasculating\" rivals and more on encouraging others to reach similar heights, with the three bishops acting \"as arbiters of <em>aretē</em> by praising, rebuking, and evaluating performances\" (67). As Howard demonstrates, these <strong>[End Page 594]</strong> authors shaped their rhetoric and <em>exempla</em> to suit particular contexts and correspondents, while also arguing for an alignment between traditional elite values and Christianity. Chapter Two continues to examine epistolary exchange and the notion of <em>philia</em> (\"friendship\") in creating a community of <em>pepaideumenoi</em>. It focuses in particular on letters conveying the presence of an absent person by analyzing references to the eyes, voice, and hands and demonstrating how they drew on classical, Jewish, and Christian ideas, while also considering epistolary communication as a form of gift exchange.</p> <p>The book's second half concerns hagiography, with Chapter Three consisting of a set of close readings of the Gregories' portrayals of Caesarius, Basil, Gregory Thaumaturgus, Gorgonia, and Macrina. Howard explores the portrayal of \"manliness and nobility\" (158) in these texts, particularly the use of a combination of classical and biblical <em>exempla</em> for the agonistic tropes of athletics and warfare, and brings out clearly the distinctive <em>aretē</em> attributed to the saintly women. Chapter Four then considers how these authors presented Athanasius of Alexandria, Basil, and Macrina as \"embodiments of sacred <em>aret...</em></p> </p>","PeriodicalId":44662,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity by Nathan D. Howard (review)\",\"authors\":\"Richard Flower\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/earl.2023.a915045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity</em> by Nathan D. Howard <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Richard Flower </li> </ul> Nathan D. Howard <em>Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity</em> Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023 Pp. xvi + 338. $120.00. <p>When the emperor Julian's relationship with Antioch soured during his stay there on his way to Persia, his response was characteristically idiosyncratic: he penned his <em>Misopogon</em>, or <em>Beard Hater</em>, and had it posted up publicly for all to see. In this incredibly sarcastic treatise, he issued a mock apology for his appearance, including his philosophical beard and shaggy chest-hair, contrasting it with the depilated bodies of the Antiochenes, which were \\\"smoother than women\\\" (346A). He similarly compared his own austere, bookish lifestyle with the city's love of luxury, with excessive eating, drinking, dancing, and theater-going. Moreover, Julian claimed that his devotion to <em>paideia</em> and \\\"manliness\\\" (ἀνδρεία) in resisting desires were instilled during his youth by his tutor Mardonius, who was both a Scythian barbarian and a eunuch. In a reversal of expectations, Mardonius understood proper masculinity much better than the so-called \\\"men\\\" of Antioch.</p> <p>Nathan D. Howard's book examines the deployment of similar discourse by three of Julian's Christian contemporaries, the \\\"Cappadocian Fathers\\\" Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus. Despite being vehemently opposed to the pagan emperor, the trio enjoyed the same elite educational background as him and were keen to present themselves (and other figures they approved of) as <em>pepaideumenoi</em>, paradigmatic examples of cultured, aristocratic men who formed the ruling class of the later Roman empire. Howard therefore situates these bishops firmly within a classical tradition of constructing the ideal Greek man, while also demonstrating some distinctively Christian elements of their rhetoric, most notably in the celebration of asceticism, the incorporation of biblical <em>exempla</em>, and the deployment of these ideas for invective against enemies of Nicene theology, especially \\\"Heterousian\\\" heretics. The substantial Introduction establishes important context, exploring a wealth of different factors involved in the characterization of elite men during the preceding centuries. Howard focuses in particular on the agonistic culture of public oratory and performance during the \\\"Second Sophistic,\\\" drawing on studies of the construction of masculinity and <em>aretē</em> (\\\"excellence\\\") in this period, especially the work of Maud Gleason and Erik Gunderson. The Introduction does, however, range much more widely, examining scholarship on an impressive array of topics, including civic euergetism, identity theory, Christian ideas of \\\"transcendent masculinity,\\\" and approaches to letter collections and hagiography.</p> <p>The first two chapters both employ the concept of the <em>agōn</em> (\\\"contest\\\") and its role in proving and displaying masculinity. Chapter One engages particularly closely with Second Sophistic ideas about the role of the <em>agōn</em> in displaying <em>aretē</em>, but argues that, in the letters of the Cappadocians, the focus was less on defeating and \\\"emasculating\\\" rivals and more on encouraging others to reach similar heights, with the three bishops acting \\\"as arbiters of <em>aretē</em> by praising, rebuking, and evaluating performances\\\" (67). As Howard demonstrates, these <strong>[End Page 594]</strong> authors shaped their rhetoric and <em>exempla</em> to suit particular contexts and correspondents, while also arguing for an alignment between traditional elite values and Christianity. Chapter Two continues to examine epistolary exchange and the notion of <em>philia</em> (\\\"friendship\\\") in creating a community of <em>pepaideumenoi</em>. It focuses in particular on letters conveying the presence of an absent person by analyzing references to the eyes, voice, and hands and demonstrating how they drew on classical, Jewish, and Christian ideas, while also considering epistolary communication as a form of gift exchange.</p> <p>The book's second half concerns hagiography, with Chapter Three consisting of a set of close readings of the Gregories' portrayals of Caesarius, Basil, Gregory Thaumaturgus, Gorgonia, and Macrina. Howard explores the portrayal of \\\"manliness and nobility\\\" (158) in these texts, particularly the use of a combination of classical and biblical <em>exempla</em> for the agonistic tropes of athletics and warfare, and brings out clearly the distinctive <em>aretē</em> attributed to the saintly women. Chapter Four then considers how these authors presented Athanasius of Alexandria, Basil, and Macrina as \\\"embodiments of sacred <em>aret...</em></p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2023.a915045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2023.a915045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 基督教与古代晚期的男子气概之争:Nathan D. Howard 著 Richard Flower 译 Nathan D. Howard 著 Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity:卡帕多西亚教父与男性修辞学》,剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2023 年,第 xvi + 338 页。$120.00.当皇帝朱利安在前往波斯途中逗留安提阿期间与安提阿的关系恶化时,他做出了特立独行的回应:他撰写了《Misopogon》,即《憎恶胡须者》,并将其公开张贴,让所有人都能看到。在这篇讽刺性极强的论文中,他对自己的外貌,包括充满哲理的胡须和蓬乱的胸毛进行了嘲讽性的道歉,并将其与安提柯奈人 "比女人还光滑"(346A)的脱毛身体进行了对比。同样,他还将自己朴素的书生气生活方式与城市中的奢侈之风,即过度饮食、饮酒、跳舞和看戏进行了对比。此外,朱利安还声称,他在青年时期就被身为斯基泰野蛮人和太监的家庭教师马尔多纽斯灌输了虔诚的信仰和抵制欲望的 "男子气概"(ἀνδρεία)。马尔多尼乌斯颠覆了人们的期望,他比安提阿的所谓 "男人 "更了解男子气概。内森-D-霍华德(Nathan D. Howard)在书中研究了与朱利安同时代的三位基督徒--"卡帕多西亚教父 "凯撒利亚的罗勒、尼萨的格雷戈里和拿细安祖斯的格雷戈里--对类似论述的运用。尽管他们极力反对这位异教皇帝,但他们三人与这位皇帝拥有相同的精英教育背景,并热衷于将自己(以及他们认可的其他人物)塑造成有教养的贵族典范,他们构成了后来罗马帝国的统治阶层。因此,霍华德将这些主教牢牢地置于塑造理想希腊人的古典传统之中,同时也展示了他们修辞中一些独特的基督教元素,最明显的是对禁欲主义的颂扬、圣经典范的融入,以及利用这些思想抨击尼西亚神学的敌人,尤其是 "异端 "异教徒。内容充实的导言确立了重要的背景,探讨了前几个世纪精英人物描写所涉及的大量不同因素。霍华德特别关注了 "第二次诡辩 "时期的公共演说和表演文化,并借鉴了这一时期对男性气质和aretē("卓越")构建的研究,尤其是莫德-格里森和埃里克-冈德森的研究成果。不过,《导论》的研究范围更为广泛,对一系列令人印象深刻的主题进行了研究,包括公民优生论、身份理论、基督教的 "超越男性 "思想,以及书信集和传记的研究方法。前两章都采用了agōn("竞赛")的概念及其在证明和展示男子气概方面的作用。第一章与第二诡辩派关于agōn在展示aretē中的作用的观点尤其密切相关,但认为在卡帕多西亚人的书信中,重点不在于击败和 "削弱 "对手,而在于鼓励其他人达到类似的高度,三位主教 "通过表扬、斥责和评价表现来充当aretē的仲裁者"(67)。正如霍华德所展示的,这些 [第 594 页完] 作者塑造了他们的修辞和范例,以适应特定的背景和通信者,同时也在论证传统精英价值观与基督教之间的一致性。第二章继续研究书信交流和 philia("友谊")概念在创建 pepaideumenoi 社区中的作用。该章通过分析书信中提到的眼睛、声音和手,特别关注了传递不在场者存在的书信,并展示了这些书信是如何借鉴古典、犹太和基督教思想的,同时还将书信交流视为一种礼物交换形式。该书的后半部分涉及传记文学,其中第三章是对格里高利家族描写的凯撒里乌斯、罗勒、格里高利-陶马图尔古斯、戈尔戈尼亚和麦克里纳的一组细读。霍华德探讨了这些文本中对 "男子气概和贵族气质"(158)的描绘,尤其是将古典和圣经范例结合起来运用于竞技和战争的咏叹调,并清晰地展现了圣女们与众不同的特质。然后,第四章探讨了这些作者如何将亚历山大的亚他那修、巴西尔和麦克里纳描绘成 "圣女的化身"。
Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity by Nathan D. Howard (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity by Nathan D. Howard
Richard Flower
Nathan D. Howard Christianity and the Contest for Manhood in Late Antiquity: The Cappadocian Fathers and the Rhetoric of Masculinity Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023 Pp. xvi + 338. $120.00.
When the emperor Julian's relationship with Antioch soured during his stay there on his way to Persia, his response was characteristically idiosyncratic: he penned his Misopogon, or Beard Hater, and had it posted up publicly for all to see. In this incredibly sarcastic treatise, he issued a mock apology for his appearance, including his philosophical beard and shaggy chest-hair, contrasting it with the depilated bodies of the Antiochenes, which were "smoother than women" (346A). He similarly compared his own austere, bookish lifestyle with the city's love of luxury, with excessive eating, drinking, dancing, and theater-going. Moreover, Julian claimed that his devotion to paideia and "manliness" (ἀνδρεία) in resisting desires were instilled during his youth by his tutor Mardonius, who was both a Scythian barbarian and a eunuch. In a reversal of expectations, Mardonius understood proper masculinity much better than the so-called "men" of Antioch.
Nathan D. Howard's book examines the deployment of similar discourse by three of Julian's Christian contemporaries, the "Cappadocian Fathers" Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus. Despite being vehemently opposed to the pagan emperor, the trio enjoyed the same elite educational background as him and were keen to present themselves (and other figures they approved of) as pepaideumenoi, paradigmatic examples of cultured, aristocratic men who formed the ruling class of the later Roman empire. Howard therefore situates these bishops firmly within a classical tradition of constructing the ideal Greek man, while also demonstrating some distinctively Christian elements of their rhetoric, most notably in the celebration of asceticism, the incorporation of biblical exempla, and the deployment of these ideas for invective against enemies of Nicene theology, especially "Heterousian" heretics. The substantial Introduction establishes important context, exploring a wealth of different factors involved in the characterization of elite men during the preceding centuries. Howard focuses in particular on the agonistic culture of public oratory and performance during the "Second Sophistic," drawing on studies of the construction of masculinity and aretē ("excellence") in this period, especially the work of Maud Gleason and Erik Gunderson. The Introduction does, however, range much more widely, examining scholarship on an impressive array of topics, including civic euergetism, identity theory, Christian ideas of "transcendent masculinity," and approaches to letter collections and hagiography.
The first two chapters both employ the concept of the agōn ("contest") and its role in proving and displaying masculinity. Chapter One engages particularly closely with Second Sophistic ideas about the role of the agōn in displaying aretē, but argues that, in the letters of the Cappadocians, the focus was less on defeating and "emasculating" rivals and more on encouraging others to reach similar heights, with the three bishops acting "as arbiters of aretē by praising, rebuking, and evaluating performances" (67). As Howard demonstrates, these [End Page 594] authors shaped their rhetoric and exempla to suit particular contexts and correspondents, while also arguing for an alignment between traditional elite values and Christianity. Chapter Two continues to examine epistolary exchange and the notion of philia ("friendship") in creating a community of pepaideumenoi. It focuses in particular on letters conveying the presence of an absent person by analyzing references to the eyes, voice, and hands and demonstrating how they drew on classical, Jewish, and Christian ideas, while also considering epistolary communication as a form of gift exchange.
The book's second half concerns hagiography, with Chapter Three consisting of a set of close readings of the Gregories' portrayals of Caesarius, Basil, Gregory Thaumaturgus, Gorgonia, and Macrina. Howard explores the portrayal of "manliness and nobility" (158) in these texts, particularly the use of a combination of classical and biblical exempla for the agonistic tropes of athletics and warfare, and brings out clearly the distinctive aretē attributed to the saintly women. Chapter Four then considers how these authors presented Athanasius of Alexandria, Basil, and Macrina as "embodiments of sacred aret...
期刊介绍:
The official publication of the North American Patristics Society (NAPS), the Journal of Early Christian Studies focuses on the study of Christianity in the context of late ancient societies and religions from c.e. 100-700. Incorporating The Second Century (an earlier publication), the Journal publishes the best of traditional patristics scholarship while showcasing articles that call attention to newer themes and methodologies than those appearing in other patristics journals. An extensive book review section is featured in every issue.