维罗妮卡-罗伯茨-奥格尔著《奥古斯丁笔下的政治与尘世之城》(评论)

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1353/earl.2023.a915035
Naoki Kamimura
{"title":"维罗妮卡-罗伯茨-奥格尔著《奥古斯丁笔下的政治与尘世之城》(评论)","authors":"Naoki Kamimura","doi":"10.1353/earl.2023.a915035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's</em> by Veronica Roberts Ogle <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Naoki Kamimura </li> </ul> Veronica Roberts Ogle <em>Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's</em> City of God Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020 Pp. x + 201. $99.00. <p>In her 2020 book, <em>Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's</em> City of God, Veronica Roberts Ogle critically examines what the \"earthly city\" means as presented in Augustine's <em>City of God</em> and draws attention to the \"psychagogic\" function of the rhetoric of the <em>City of God</em>. She argues that the status of \"politics\" should be determined within a sacramental worldview. She also claims that Augustine expects his readers \"to work for an earthly peace understood in light of <em>amor Dei</em> … in light of the needs of concrete human persons\" (183).</p> <p>Augustine's <em>City of God</em>, like other important works in his corpus, is a fascinating text that has addressed us with a \"great and arduous task,\" so to speak, the response to which has always been debated and questioned. Many who have discussed the implications of Augustine's model of two \"cities\" for our society indicate that Augustine's pessimistic emphasis on politics most aptly expresses his contempt for the political character of our lives. Indeed, Augustinian scholarship in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries has been mired in debates over conflicting positions on the status of politics in Augustine's thought. Those who have worked in this area will know well that scholars such as Ernest Fortin, Herbert Deane, Robert Markus, John Milbank, Rowan Williams, Robert Dodaro, Gerald O'Daly, and Gillian Clark have argued over whether Augustine was a political realist, whether he positioned the political sphere as a neutral space, or whether he viewed the political in a pessimistic light. Ogle provides a valuable overview of this sequence of discussions in the Introduction. With the six chapters that follow and a brief conclusion, Ogle's book joins more recent attempts (e.g., those of Eric Gregory, Michael Bruno, Richard Dougherty, Michael Lamb, and Mary Keys) to articulate Augustine's multifaceted view of political philosophy and theology.</p> <p>After showing the <em>status quaestionis</em> and its correlation with her work in the Introduction, in Chapter One, \"The Parodic City,\" Ogle details how Augustine's \"earthly city\" is a \"counterfeit\" or \"shadow of the city of God\" (41), examining the argument in Books 11–14 of the <em>City of God</em> and presenting <em>amor sui</em> as the destructive logic contained in the earthly city. Chapter Two, \"The Sack of <em>Roma Aeterna</em>,\" reveals Augustine's attempt, based on his psychagogical methods, to <strong>[End Page 575]</strong> direct the reader's attention beyond the history of the city of Rome to that of the two cities. Chapter Three, \"Exposing the Worldviews of Empires, Patriots, and Philosophers,\" exposes the problematic nature of three false solutions to <em>amor sui</em>—the promise of empire, the promise of political philosophy, and the promise of philosophy as a way of life—by looking at the psychagogical debate from a broader perspective. Chapter Four, \"Roman History Retold,\" exposes the limitations of telling Roman history without distortion. His readers will be urged to shift their attention from their earthly city (<em>patria</em>) to the true, heavenly city. In Chapter Five, \"The Sacramental Worldview and Its Antisacramental Distortion,\" Ogle places the two cities within what she calls Augustine's \"sacramental worldview,\" the vision in which Augustine expects the readers of the <em>City of God</em> will be led to God, their creator. For Augustine, the church is the primary vehicle for liberating them from the earthly city and its superstitions and cultivating <em>amor Dei</em>. In Chapter Six, \"The Status of Politics,\" Ogle, after an interpretation of Augustine's vision of secular life, articulates the role that politics should play in the sacramental worldview. As a pilgrim whose <em>patria</em> lies beyond any actual political community, Christians should participate in their community. In the meantime, they must do so with a humble spirit of service for the sake of <em>amor Dei</em>.</p> <p>There are, however, a few points I found myself questioning. First, it would be persuasive for the author's reading and helpful in avoiding misunderstandings if she were to provide more clarity about what...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":44662,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's by Veronica Roberts Ogle (review)\",\"authors\":\"Naoki Kamimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/earl.2023.a915035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's</em> by Veronica Roberts Ogle <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Naoki Kamimura </li> </ul> Veronica Roberts Ogle <em>Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's</em> City of God Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020 Pp. x + 201. $99.00. <p>In her 2020 book, <em>Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's</em> City of God, Veronica Roberts Ogle critically examines what the \\\"earthly city\\\" means as presented in Augustine's <em>City of God</em> and draws attention to the \\\"psychagogic\\\" function of the rhetoric of the <em>City of God</em>. She argues that the status of \\\"politics\\\" should be determined within a sacramental worldview. She also claims that Augustine expects his readers \\\"to work for an earthly peace understood in light of <em>amor Dei</em> … in light of the needs of concrete human persons\\\" (183).</p> <p>Augustine's <em>City of God</em>, like other important works in his corpus, is a fascinating text that has addressed us with a \\\"great and arduous task,\\\" so to speak, the response to which has always been debated and questioned. Many who have discussed the implications of Augustine's model of two \\\"cities\\\" for our society indicate that Augustine's pessimistic emphasis on politics most aptly expresses his contempt for the political character of our lives. Indeed, Augustinian scholarship in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries has been mired in debates over conflicting positions on the status of politics in Augustine's thought. Those who have worked in this area will know well that scholars such as Ernest Fortin, Herbert Deane, Robert Markus, John Milbank, Rowan Williams, Robert Dodaro, Gerald O'Daly, and Gillian Clark have argued over whether Augustine was a political realist, whether he positioned the political sphere as a neutral space, or whether he viewed the political in a pessimistic light. Ogle provides a valuable overview of this sequence of discussions in the Introduction. With the six chapters that follow and a brief conclusion, Ogle's book joins more recent attempts (e.g., those of Eric Gregory, Michael Bruno, Richard Dougherty, Michael Lamb, and Mary Keys) to articulate Augustine's multifaceted view of political philosophy and theology.</p> <p>After showing the <em>status quaestionis</em> and its correlation with her work in the Introduction, in Chapter One, \\\"The Parodic City,\\\" Ogle details how Augustine's \\\"earthly city\\\" is a \\\"counterfeit\\\" or \\\"shadow of the city of God\\\" (41), examining the argument in Books 11–14 of the <em>City of God</em> and presenting <em>amor sui</em> as the destructive logic contained in the earthly city. Chapter Two, \\\"The Sack of <em>Roma Aeterna</em>,\\\" reveals Augustine's attempt, based on his psychagogical methods, to <strong>[End Page 575]</strong> direct the reader's attention beyond the history of the city of Rome to that of the two cities. Chapter Three, \\\"Exposing the Worldviews of Empires, Patriots, and Philosophers,\\\" exposes the problematic nature of three false solutions to <em>amor sui</em>—the promise of empire, the promise of political philosophy, and the promise of philosophy as a way of life—by looking at the psychagogical debate from a broader perspective. Chapter Four, \\\"Roman History Retold,\\\" exposes the limitations of telling Roman history without distortion. His readers will be urged to shift their attention from their earthly city (<em>patria</em>) to the true, heavenly city. In Chapter Five, \\\"The Sacramental Worldview and Its Antisacramental Distortion,\\\" Ogle places the two cities within what she calls Augustine's \\\"sacramental worldview,\\\" the vision in which Augustine expects the readers of the <em>City of God</em> will be led to God, their creator. For Augustine, the church is the primary vehicle for liberating them from the earthly city and its superstitions and cultivating <em>amor Dei</em>. In Chapter Six, \\\"The Status of Politics,\\\" Ogle, after an interpretation of Augustine's vision of secular life, articulates the role that politics should play in the sacramental worldview. As a pilgrim whose <em>patria</em> lies beyond any actual political community, Christians should participate in their community. In the meantime, they must do so with a humble spirit of service for the sake of <em>amor Dei</em>.</p> <p>There are, however, a few points I found myself questioning. First, it would be persuasive for the author's reading and helpful in avoiding misunderstandings if she were to provide more clarity about what...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2023.a915035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2023.a915035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 奥古斯丁《上帝之城》中的政治与尘世之城 作者:Veronica Roberts Ogle Naoki Kamimura Veronica Roberts Ogle Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's City of God Cambridge:剑桥大学出版社,2020 年,第 x 页 + 201 页。$99.00.维罗妮卡-罗伯茨-奥格尔(Veronica Roberts Ogle)在其 2020 年出版的著作《奥古斯丁〈上帝之城〉中的政治与尘世之城》中,批判性地研究了奥古斯丁《上帝之城》中所呈现的 "尘世之城 "的含义,并提请人们注意《上帝之城》修辞的 "心理教化 "功能。她认为,"政治 "的地位应在神圣的世界观中确定。她还声称,奥古斯丁期望他的读者 "根据'挚爱'......根据具体的人的需要,为理解的尘世和平而努力"(183)。奥古斯丁的《上帝之城》与他的其他重要著作一样,是一部引人入胜的文本,向我们提出了所谓的 "伟大而艰巨的任务",对此的回应一直存在争论和质疑。许多讨论过奥古斯丁的双 "城 "模式对我们社会的影响的人都指出,奥古斯丁对政治的悲观强调最恰当地表达了他对我们生活的政治特征的蔑视。事实上,二十世纪和二十一世纪的奥古斯丁学术研究一直深陷于关于政治在奥古斯丁思想中地位的立场冲突的争论之中。在这一领域工作过的人都很清楚,欧内斯特-福尔廷、赫伯特-迪恩、罗伯特-马库斯、约翰-米尔班克、罗旺-威廉斯、罗伯特-多达罗、杰拉尔德-奥达利和吉莉安-克拉克等学者曾就奥古斯丁是否是政治现实主义者、他是否将政治领域定位为中立空间、或者他是否以悲观的眼光看待政治等问题展开过争论。奥格尔在导言中对这一系列讨论进行了有价值的概述。通过接下来的六章和一个简短的结论,奥格尔的书加入了更多新近的尝试(如埃里克-格雷戈里、迈克尔-布鲁诺、理查德-多尔蒂、迈克尔-兰姆和玛丽-凯斯的尝试),以阐明奥古斯丁多方面的政治哲学和神学观点。在导言中展示了 "quaestionis "及其与奥古斯丁作品的关联之后,奥格尔在第一章 "模仿之城 "中详细阐述了奥古斯丁的 "尘世之城 "是如何成为 "上帝之城的赝品 "或 "影子"(41)的,他考察了《上帝之城》第11-14卷中的论证,并将 "amor sui "作为尘世之城所包含的破坏性逻辑加以呈现。第二章 "罗马城的劫掠 "揭示了奥古斯丁根据其心理学方法,试图 [End Page 575] 将读者的注意力从罗马城的历史引向两座城市的历史。第三章 "揭露帝国、爱国者和哲学家的世界观 "通过从更广阔的视角审视心理哲学的争论,揭露了 "友谊 "的三种错误解决方案--帝国的承诺、政治哲学的承诺和哲学作为一种生活方式的承诺--的问题本质。第四章 "重述罗马历史 "揭露了不加歪曲地讲述罗马历史的局限性。他敦促读者将注意力从尘世之城(Patria)转移到真正的天国之城。在第五章 "圣礼世界观及其反圣礼歪曲 "中,奥格尔将这两座城市置于她所称的奥古斯丁的 "圣礼世界观 "中,奥古斯丁希望《上帝之城》的读者在这一愿景中被引向上帝--他们的创造者。对奥古斯丁来说,教会是将他们从尘世的城市及其迷信中解放出来并培养 "挚爱 "的主要工具。在第六章 "政治的地位 "中,奥格尔在阐释了奥古斯丁对世俗生活的看法之后,阐明了政治在圣礼世界观中应该扮演的角色。基督徒是朝圣者,他们的祖国在任何实际的政治团体之外,基督徒应该参与他们的团体。与此同时,他们必须本着谦卑的服务精神,为 "上帝之爱"(amor Dei)而努力。然而,我发现自己有几点疑问。首先,如果作者能更清楚地说明什么是......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's by Veronica Roberts Ogle (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's by Veronica Roberts Ogle
  • Naoki Kamimura
Veronica Roberts Ogle Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's City of God Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020 Pp. x + 201. $99.00.

In her 2020 book, Politics and the Earthly City in Augustine's City of God, Veronica Roberts Ogle critically examines what the "earthly city" means as presented in Augustine's City of God and draws attention to the "psychagogic" function of the rhetoric of the City of God. She argues that the status of "politics" should be determined within a sacramental worldview. She also claims that Augustine expects his readers "to work for an earthly peace understood in light of amor Dei … in light of the needs of concrete human persons" (183).

Augustine's City of God, like other important works in his corpus, is a fascinating text that has addressed us with a "great and arduous task," so to speak, the response to which has always been debated and questioned. Many who have discussed the implications of Augustine's model of two "cities" for our society indicate that Augustine's pessimistic emphasis on politics most aptly expresses his contempt for the political character of our lives. Indeed, Augustinian scholarship in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries has been mired in debates over conflicting positions on the status of politics in Augustine's thought. Those who have worked in this area will know well that scholars such as Ernest Fortin, Herbert Deane, Robert Markus, John Milbank, Rowan Williams, Robert Dodaro, Gerald O'Daly, and Gillian Clark have argued over whether Augustine was a political realist, whether he positioned the political sphere as a neutral space, or whether he viewed the political in a pessimistic light. Ogle provides a valuable overview of this sequence of discussions in the Introduction. With the six chapters that follow and a brief conclusion, Ogle's book joins more recent attempts (e.g., those of Eric Gregory, Michael Bruno, Richard Dougherty, Michael Lamb, and Mary Keys) to articulate Augustine's multifaceted view of political philosophy and theology.

After showing the status quaestionis and its correlation with her work in the Introduction, in Chapter One, "The Parodic City," Ogle details how Augustine's "earthly city" is a "counterfeit" or "shadow of the city of God" (41), examining the argument in Books 11–14 of the City of God and presenting amor sui as the destructive logic contained in the earthly city. Chapter Two, "The Sack of Roma Aeterna," reveals Augustine's attempt, based on his psychagogical methods, to [End Page 575] direct the reader's attention beyond the history of the city of Rome to that of the two cities. Chapter Three, "Exposing the Worldviews of Empires, Patriots, and Philosophers," exposes the problematic nature of three false solutions to amor sui—the promise of empire, the promise of political philosophy, and the promise of philosophy as a way of life—by looking at the psychagogical debate from a broader perspective. Chapter Four, "Roman History Retold," exposes the limitations of telling Roman history without distortion. His readers will be urged to shift their attention from their earthly city (patria) to the true, heavenly city. In Chapter Five, "The Sacramental Worldview and Its Antisacramental Distortion," Ogle places the two cities within what she calls Augustine's "sacramental worldview," the vision in which Augustine expects the readers of the City of God will be led to God, their creator. For Augustine, the church is the primary vehicle for liberating them from the earthly city and its superstitions and cultivating amor Dei. In Chapter Six, "The Status of Politics," Ogle, after an interpretation of Augustine's vision of secular life, articulates the role that politics should play in the sacramental worldview. As a pilgrim whose patria lies beyond any actual political community, Christians should participate in their community. In the meantime, they must do so with a humble spirit of service for the sake of amor Dei.

There are, however, a few points I found myself questioning. First, it would be persuasive for the author's reading and helpful in avoiding misunderstandings if she were to provide more clarity about what...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The official publication of the North American Patristics Society (NAPS), the Journal of Early Christian Studies focuses on the study of Christianity in the context of late ancient societies and religions from c.e. 100-700. Incorporating The Second Century (an earlier publication), the Journal publishes the best of traditional patristics scholarship while showcasing articles that call attention to newer themes and methodologies than those appearing in other patristics journals. An extensive book review section is featured in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Disfigurement and Deliverance: Eusebian Portrayals of Martyrdom and the Letter of the Churches of Lyons and Vienne Μετοχῇ Θεότητος: Partakers of Divinity in Origen's Contra Celsum Developments in Early Eucharistic Praying in Light of Changes in Early Christian Meeting Spaces From Text to Relics: The Emergence of the Scribe-Martyr in Late Antique Christianity (Fourth Century–Seventh Century) Reconfigured Relations: A New Perspective on the Relationship between Ambrose's De sacramentis and the Roman Canon Missae
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1