针对 2 型系统性红斑狼疮症状的医生总体评估的开发和心理计量学评估

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Lupus Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1136/lupus-2023-001016
Megan E B Clowse, Jennifer L Rogers, Theresa Coles, David S Pisetsky, Lisa G Criscione-Schreiber, Dana Burshell, Jayanth Doss, Rebecca E Sadun, Kai Sun, Mithu Maheswaranathan, Amanda M Eudy
{"title":"针对 2 型系统性红斑狼疮症状的医生总体评估的开发和心理计量学评估","authors":"Megan E B Clowse, Jennifer L Rogers, Theresa Coles, David S Pisetsky, Lisa G Criscione-Schreiber, Dana Burshell, Jayanth Doss, Rebecca E Sadun, Kai Sun, Mithu Maheswaranathan, Amanda M Eudy","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2023-001016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Manifestations of SLE can be categorised as type 1 (classic signs and symptoms of SLE) or type 2 (fatigue, widespread pain and brain fog with an unclear relationship to inflammation). While measures of type 1 SLE activity exist, most current physician-reported measures do not encompass type 2 SLE manifestations. To better evaluate type 2 SLE symptoms, we developed and psychometrically evaluated a physician-reported measure of type 2 symptoms, the Type 2 Physician Global Assessment (‘Type 2 PGA’). Methods and analysis The Type 2 PGA was developed and evaluated by six rheumatologists practising in the same academic lupus clinic. The study began with a roundtable discussion to establish consensus guidelines for scoring the Type 2 PGA. Following the roundtable, the Type 2 PGA was psychometrically evaluated using data prospectively collected from 263 patients with SLE enrolled in the Duke Lupus Registry. Results There was strong intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.83), indicating the Type 2 PGA scores were consistent within a rheumatologist and across rheumatologists. The Type 2 PGA was correlated with patient-reported symptoms of polysymptomatic distress (r=0.76), fatigue (r=0.68), cognitive dysfunction (r=0.63), waking unrefreshed (r=0.62) and forgetfulness (r=0.60), and weakly correlated with the Type 1 PGA and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index. Conclusion The Type 2 PGA performed well as a physician-reported measure of type 2 SLE symptoms. The incorporation of the Type 2 PGA into a routine rheumatology visit may improve patient care by bringing the provider’s attention to certain symptoms not well represented in conventional measures of disease activity. Data are available upon reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and psychometric evaluation of a physician global assessment for type 2 systemic lupus erythematosus symptoms\",\"authors\":\"Megan E B Clowse, Jennifer L Rogers, Theresa Coles, David S Pisetsky, Lisa G Criscione-Schreiber, Dana Burshell, Jayanth Doss, Rebecca E Sadun, Kai Sun, Mithu Maheswaranathan, Amanda M Eudy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2023-001016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective Manifestations of SLE can be categorised as type 1 (classic signs and symptoms of SLE) or type 2 (fatigue, widespread pain and brain fog with an unclear relationship to inflammation). While measures of type 1 SLE activity exist, most current physician-reported measures do not encompass type 2 SLE manifestations. To better evaluate type 2 SLE symptoms, we developed and psychometrically evaluated a physician-reported measure of type 2 symptoms, the Type 2 Physician Global Assessment (‘Type 2 PGA’). Methods and analysis The Type 2 PGA was developed and evaluated by six rheumatologists practising in the same academic lupus clinic. The study began with a roundtable discussion to establish consensus guidelines for scoring the Type 2 PGA. Following the roundtable, the Type 2 PGA was psychometrically evaluated using data prospectively collected from 263 patients with SLE enrolled in the Duke Lupus Registry. Results There was strong intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.83), indicating the Type 2 PGA scores were consistent within a rheumatologist and across rheumatologists. The Type 2 PGA was correlated with patient-reported symptoms of polysymptomatic distress (r=0.76), fatigue (r=0.68), cognitive dysfunction (r=0.63), waking unrefreshed (r=0.62) and forgetfulness (r=0.60), and weakly correlated with the Type 1 PGA and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index. Conclusion The Type 2 PGA performed well as a physician-reported measure of type 2 SLE symptoms. The incorporation of the Type 2 PGA into a routine rheumatology visit may improve patient care by bringing the provider’s attention to certain symptoms not well represented in conventional measures of disease activity. Data are available upon reasonable request.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2023-001016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2023-001016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统性红斑狼疮的客观表现可分为 1 型(系统性红斑狼疮的典型体征和症状)和 2 型(疲劳、广泛性疼痛和脑雾,与炎症的关系不明确)。虽然目前已有针对 1 型系统性红斑狼疮活动的测量方法,但大多数由医生报告的测量方法并不包括 2 型系统性红斑狼疮的表现。为了更好地评估 2 型系统性红斑狼疮的症状,我们开发了一种由医生报告的 2 型症状测量方法,即 2 型系统性红斑狼疮医生总体评估("Type 2 PGA"),并对其进行了心理计量学评估。方法与分析 2型PGA由在同一狼疮学术诊所执业的六位风湿病学家共同开发和评估。研究以圆桌讨论的形式开始,目的是为 2 型 PGA 的评分建立共识准则。圆桌会议结束后,使用从杜克大学狼疮登记处登记的 263 名系统性红斑狼疮患者中收集的数据,对 2 型 PGA 进行了心理计量学评估。结果 评定者内部和评定者之间具有很高的可靠性(类内相关系数=0.83),表明风湿病学家内部和不同风湿病学家之间的 2 型 PGA 评分是一致的。2 型 PGA 与患者报告的多症状困扰(r=0.76)、疲劳(r=0.68)、认知功能障碍(r=0.63)、醒后无精神(r=0.62)和健忘(r=0.60)等症状相关,与 1 型 PGA 和系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数的相关性较弱。结论 2型PGA作为医生报告的2型系统性红斑狼疮症状测量方法表现良好。将 2 型 PGA 纳入常规风湿病就诊中,可使医疗服务提供者注意到某些在传统疾病活动指标中没有得到很好体现的症状,从而改善对患者的护理。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and psychometric evaluation of a physician global assessment for type 2 systemic lupus erythematosus symptoms
Objective Manifestations of SLE can be categorised as type 1 (classic signs and symptoms of SLE) or type 2 (fatigue, widespread pain and brain fog with an unclear relationship to inflammation). While measures of type 1 SLE activity exist, most current physician-reported measures do not encompass type 2 SLE manifestations. To better evaluate type 2 SLE symptoms, we developed and psychometrically evaluated a physician-reported measure of type 2 symptoms, the Type 2 Physician Global Assessment (‘Type 2 PGA’). Methods and analysis The Type 2 PGA was developed and evaluated by six rheumatologists practising in the same academic lupus clinic. The study began with a roundtable discussion to establish consensus guidelines for scoring the Type 2 PGA. Following the roundtable, the Type 2 PGA was psychometrically evaluated using data prospectively collected from 263 patients with SLE enrolled in the Duke Lupus Registry. Results There was strong intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.83), indicating the Type 2 PGA scores were consistent within a rheumatologist and across rheumatologists. The Type 2 PGA was correlated with patient-reported symptoms of polysymptomatic distress (r=0.76), fatigue (r=0.68), cognitive dysfunction (r=0.63), waking unrefreshed (r=0.62) and forgetfulness (r=0.60), and weakly correlated with the Type 1 PGA and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index. Conclusion The Type 2 PGA performed well as a physician-reported measure of type 2 SLE symptoms. The incorporation of the Type 2 PGA into a routine rheumatology visit may improve patient care by bringing the provider’s attention to certain symptoms not well represented in conventional measures of disease activity. Data are available upon reasonable request.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of a voclosporin-based triple immunosuppressive therapy to high-dose glucocorticoid-based immunosuppressive therapy: a propensity analysis of the AURA-LV and AURORA 1 studies and ALMS. Using photovoice to investigate patient experiences of lupus nephritis in Canada. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on pregnancy outcome in patients with SLE: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Improving routine mental health screening for depression and anxiety in a paediatric lupus clinic: a quality improvement initiative for enhanced mental healthcare. Validating claims-based algorithms for a systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis in Medicare data for informed use of the Lupus Index: a tool for geospatial research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1