金属线和金属管的水下电气爆炸:对比研究

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Traditional Medicine Research Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1063/5.0180925
Shaojie Zhang, Yongmin Zhang, Yong Lu, Hejie Zhao, Cheng Luo, Haodong Wang, Shuangming Wang, Aici Qiu
{"title":"金属线和金属管的水下电气爆炸:对比研究","authors":"Shaojie Zhang, Yongmin Zhang, Yong Lu, Hejie Zhao, Cheng Luo, Haodong Wang, Shuangming Wang, Aici Qiu","doi":"10.1063/5.0180925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With an initial energy storage of approximately 53.5 kJ, experiments on underwater electrical explosions of metallic wire and thin-wall tube were conducted. Two sets of controlled experiments were designed, and the wire and tube for each set were of the same length, cross-sectional area, and material. Load voltage, circuit current, and shock wave pressure were measured and analyzed, and electric power, energy deposition, and energy deposition rate were also calculated and investigated. Experimental results indicated that the underwater electrical tube explosion (UETE) always has higher and earlier local resistance peak, voltage peak, and electric power peak, as well as faster phase transition and ionization process than the underwater electrical wire explosion (UEWE). In addition, the energy deposition rate from the beginning of discharge or the decrease in current to the voltage peak is significantly increased when replacing a wire with a tube. For the shock-wave characteristics, the peak pressure, energy density, and impulse of the shock wave generated by UETE are greater than that generated by UEWE. The peak pressure at ∼33 cm increased from 21.1 to 24.5 MPa in the first set and from 18.1 to 21.7 MPa in the second when a tube was used instead of a wire. These experimental results help us understand the physical process of UETE and provide an alternative methodology for load design in industrial applications.","PeriodicalId":23192,"journal":{"name":"Traditional Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study\",\"authors\":\"Shaojie Zhang, Yongmin Zhang, Yong Lu, Hejie Zhao, Cheng Luo, Haodong Wang, Shuangming Wang, Aici Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0180925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With an initial energy storage of approximately 53.5 kJ, experiments on underwater electrical explosions of metallic wire and thin-wall tube were conducted. Two sets of controlled experiments were designed, and the wire and tube for each set were of the same length, cross-sectional area, and material. Load voltage, circuit current, and shock wave pressure were measured and analyzed, and electric power, energy deposition, and energy deposition rate were also calculated and investigated. Experimental results indicated that the underwater electrical tube explosion (UETE) always has higher and earlier local resistance peak, voltage peak, and electric power peak, as well as faster phase transition and ionization process than the underwater electrical wire explosion (UEWE). In addition, the energy deposition rate from the beginning of discharge or the decrease in current to the voltage peak is significantly increased when replacing a wire with a tube. For the shock-wave characteristics, the peak pressure, energy density, and impulse of the shock wave generated by UETE are greater than that generated by UEWE. The peak pressure at ∼33 cm increased from 21.1 to 24.5 MPa in the first set and from 18.1 to 21.7 MPa in the second when a tube was used instead of a wire. These experimental results help us understand the physical process of UETE and provide an alternative methodology for load design in industrial applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traditional Medicine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traditional Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180925\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traditional Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在初始储能约为 53.5 kJ 的情况下,进行了金属丝和薄壁管的水下电爆炸实验。设计了两组对照实验,每组实验的金属丝和薄壁管的长度、横截面积和材料均相同。对负载电压、电路电流和冲击波压力进行了测量和分析,并计算和研究了电功率、能量沉积和能量沉积率。实验结果表明,与水下电线爆炸(UEWE)相比,水下电管爆炸(UETE)总是具有更高和更早的局部电阻峰值、电压峰值和电功率峰值,以及更快的相变和电离过程。此外,用管子代替电线时,从放电开始或电流减小到电压峰值的能量沉积率也会显著提高。在冲击波特性方面,UETE 产生的冲击波的峰值压力、能量密度和脉冲均大于 UEWE。当使用管子代替金属丝时,第一组在 ∼33 厘米处的峰值压力从 21.1 兆帕增加到 24.5 兆帕,第二组从 18.1 兆帕增加到 21.7 兆帕。这些实验结果有助于我们了解 UETE 的物理过程,并为工业应用中的负载设计提供了一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study
With an initial energy storage of approximately 53.5 kJ, experiments on underwater electrical explosions of metallic wire and thin-wall tube were conducted. Two sets of controlled experiments were designed, and the wire and tube for each set were of the same length, cross-sectional area, and material. Load voltage, circuit current, and shock wave pressure were measured and analyzed, and electric power, energy deposition, and energy deposition rate were also calculated and investigated. Experimental results indicated that the underwater electrical tube explosion (UETE) always has higher and earlier local resistance peak, voltage peak, and electric power peak, as well as faster phase transition and ionization process than the underwater electrical wire explosion (UEWE). In addition, the energy deposition rate from the beginning of discharge or the decrease in current to the voltage peak is significantly increased when replacing a wire with a tube. For the shock-wave characteristics, the peak pressure, energy density, and impulse of the shock wave generated by UETE are greater than that generated by UEWE. The peak pressure at ∼33 cm increased from 21.1 to 24.5 MPa in the first set and from 18.1 to 21.7 MPa in the second when a tube was used instead of a wire. These experimental results help us understand the physical process of UETE and provide an alternative methodology for load design in industrial applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traditional Medicine Research
Traditional Medicine Research INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
自引率
7.70%
发文量
240
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Underwater electrical explosion of metallic wire and tube: A comparison study Positive Effects of ‘AUM’ Chanting on Mental Health Well-Being In Vitro Establishment, Hydroponic, Salt Tolerance, Antifungal And Phytochemical Investigations In Important Sand Binder Medicinal Plant Ipomoea Pes-Caprae Danlu Tongdu tablets treat lumbar spinal stenosis through reducing reactive oxygen species and apoptosis by regulating CDK2/CDK4/CDKN1A expression The effect of head and facial massage on sleep condition after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1