APAAACI 关于青霉素过敏脱标直接激发试验的临床路径。

IF 1.6 Q3 ALLERGY Asia Pacific Allergy Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-18 DOI:10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000122
Philip Hei Li, Bernard Yu-Hor Thong, Ruby Pawankar, Chandima Jeewandara, Rommel Crisenio M Lobo, Hye-Ryun Kang, Padukudru Anand Mahesh, Juan Meng, Sonomjamts Munkhbayarlakh, Duy Le Pham, Ticha Rerkpattanapipat, Min-Moon Tang, Masao Yamaguchi, Amir Hamzah Abdul Latiff, Iris Rengganis, Jiu-Yao Wang, Luo Zhang, Michaela Lucas
{"title":"APAAACI 关于青霉素过敏脱标直接激发试验的临床路径。","authors":"Philip Hei Li, Bernard Yu-Hor Thong, Ruby Pawankar, Chandima Jeewandara, Rommel Crisenio M Lobo, Hye-Ryun Kang, Padukudru Anand Mahesh, Juan Meng, Sonomjamts Munkhbayarlakh, Duy Le Pham, Ticha Rerkpattanapipat, Min-Moon Tang, Masao Yamaguchi, Amir Hamzah Abdul Latiff, Iris Rengganis, Jiu-Yao Wang, Luo Zhang, Michaela Lucas","doi":"10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergy to penicillin is commonly reported in many countries and is an overwhelming global public health concern. Penicillin allergy labels can lead to the use of less effective antibiotics and can be associated with antimicrobial resistance. Appropriate assessment of suspected penicillin allergy (often including skin testing, followed by drug provocation testing [DPT] performed by allergists) can prevent the unnecessary restriction of penicillin or delabelling. Many countries in the Asia Pacific (AP) have very limited access to allergy services, and there are significant disparities in the methods of evaluating penicillin allergy. Therefore, a clinical pathway for the management of penicillin allergy is essential.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a risk-stratified clinical pathway for delabeling penicillin allergy, taking into account the distinct epidemiology, patient/sensitization profiles, and disparities of allergy services or facilities within the AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A risk-stratified penicillin allergy delabeling clinical pathway was formulated by the Drug Allergy Committee of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. and members of the Penicillin Allergy Disparities survey in AP each representing one country/region of the AP. The clinical pathway was tested based on a database of anonymized patients who were sequentially referred for and completed penicillin allergy evaluation in Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical pathway was piloted employing a \"hub-and-spoke\" approach to foster multidisciplinary collaboration between allergists and nonallergists. A simulation run of the algorithm on a retrospective Hong Kong cohort of 439 patients was performed. Overall, 367 (84%) of patients were suitable for direct DPT and reduced the need for skin testing or specialist's care for 357 (97%) skin test-negative individuals. Out of the skin test-negative patients, 345 (94%) patients had a negative DPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This risk-stratification strategy for direct oral DPT can reduce the need for unnecessary skin testing in patients with low-risk penicillin allergy histories. The hub and spoke model of care may be considered for further piloting and validation in other AP populations that lack adequately trained allergists.</p>","PeriodicalId":8488,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Allergy","volume":"13 4","pages":"142-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APAAACI clinical pathway on direct provocation testing for penicillin allergy delabeling.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Hei Li, Bernard Yu-Hor Thong, Ruby Pawankar, Chandima Jeewandara, Rommel Crisenio M Lobo, Hye-Ryun Kang, Padukudru Anand Mahesh, Juan Meng, Sonomjamts Munkhbayarlakh, Duy Le Pham, Ticha Rerkpattanapipat, Min-Moon Tang, Masao Yamaguchi, Amir Hamzah Abdul Latiff, Iris Rengganis, Jiu-Yao Wang, Luo Zhang, Michaela Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergy to penicillin is commonly reported in many countries and is an overwhelming global public health concern. Penicillin allergy labels can lead to the use of less effective antibiotics and can be associated with antimicrobial resistance. Appropriate assessment of suspected penicillin allergy (often including skin testing, followed by drug provocation testing [DPT] performed by allergists) can prevent the unnecessary restriction of penicillin or delabelling. Many countries in the Asia Pacific (AP) have very limited access to allergy services, and there are significant disparities in the methods of evaluating penicillin allergy. Therefore, a clinical pathway for the management of penicillin allergy is essential.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a risk-stratified clinical pathway for delabeling penicillin allergy, taking into account the distinct epidemiology, patient/sensitization profiles, and disparities of allergy services or facilities within the AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A risk-stratified penicillin allergy delabeling clinical pathway was formulated by the Drug Allergy Committee of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. and members of the Penicillin Allergy Disparities survey in AP each representing one country/region of the AP. The clinical pathway was tested based on a database of anonymized patients who were sequentially referred for and completed penicillin allergy evaluation in Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical pathway was piloted employing a \\\"hub-and-spoke\\\" approach to foster multidisciplinary collaboration between allergists and nonallergists. A simulation run of the algorithm on a retrospective Hong Kong cohort of 439 patients was performed. Overall, 367 (84%) of patients were suitable for direct DPT and reduced the need for skin testing or specialist's care for 357 (97%) skin test-negative individuals. Out of the skin test-negative patients, 345 (94%) patients had a negative DPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This risk-stratification strategy for direct oral DPT can reduce the need for unnecessary skin testing in patients with low-risk penicillin allergy histories. The hub and spoke model of care may be considered for further piloting and validation in other AP populations that lack adequately trained allergists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"142-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715740/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多国家都有青霉素过敏的报道,这是一个令人担忧的全球公共卫生问题。青霉素过敏标签可导致使用效果较差的抗生素,并可能与抗菌药耐药性有关。对疑似青霉素过敏进行适当的评估(通常包括皮试,然后由过敏学家进行药物激发试验 [DPT])可以避免不必要地限制使用青霉素或取消标签。亚太地区(AP)许多国家的过敏服务非常有限,青霉素过敏的评估方法也存在很大差异。因此,制定青霉素过敏临床治疗路径至关重要:考虑到亚太地区内不同的流行病学、患者/过敏情况以及过敏服务或设施的差异,制定一个风险分级的青霉素过敏脱敏临床路径:方法:亚太地区过敏、哮喘和临床免疫学协会药物过敏委员会和亚太地区青霉素过敏差异调查的成员各代表亚太地区的一个国家/地区,共同制定了风险分级的青霉素过敏脱敏临床路径。临床路径的测试基于一个匿名数据库,该数据库包含了在香港依次转诊并完成青霉素过敏评估的患者:临床路径采用 "中心辐射 "的方式进行试点,以促进过敏学家和非过敏学家之间的多学科合作。该算法对香港的 439 名患者进行了模拟运行。总体而言,有 367 名(84%)患者适合直接使用 DPT,并减少了 357 名(97%)皮试阴性患者的皮试或专科护理需求。在皮试阴性的患者中,有 345 人(94%)的 DPT 结果为阴性:结论:这种直接口服 DPT 的风险分级策略可减少有低风险青霉素过敏史的患者进行不必要的皮试。可以考虑在其他缺乏训练有素的过敏专科医生的 AP 群体中进一步试点和验证这种 "中心辐射 "护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
APAAACI clinical pathway on direct provocation testing for penicillin allergy delabeling.

Background: Allergy to penicillin is commonly reported in many countries and is an overwhelming global public health concern. Penicillin allergy labels can lead to the use of less effective antibiotics and can be associated with antimicrobial resistance. Appropriate assessment of suspected penicillin allergy (often including skin testing, followed by drug provocation testing [DPT] performed by allergists) can prevent the unnecessary restriction of penicillin or delabelling. Many countries in the Asia Pacific (AP) have very limited access to allergy services, and there are significant disparities in the methods of evaluating penicillin allergy. Therefore, a clinical pathway for the management of penicillin allergy is essential.

Objectives: To develop a risk-stratified clinical pathway for delabeling penicillin allergy, taking into account the distinct epidemiology, patient/sensitization profiles, and disparities of allergy services or facilities within the AP.

Methods: A risk-stratified penicillin allergy delabeling clinical pathway was formulated by the Drug Allergy Committee of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. and members of the Penicillin Allergy Disparities survey in AP each representing one country/region of the AP. The clinical pathway was tested based on a database of anonymized patients who were sequentially referred for and completed penicillin allergy evaluation in Hong Kong.

Results: The clinical pathway was piloted employing a "hub-and-spoke" approach to foster multidisciplinary collaboration between allergists and nonallergists. A simulation run of the algorithm on a retrospective Hong Kong cohort of 439 patients was performed. Overall, 367 (84%) of patients were suitable for direct DPT and reduced the need for skin testing or specialist's care for 357 (97%) skin test-negative individuals. Out of the skin test-negative patients, 345 (94%) patients had a negative DPT.

Conclusions: This risk-stratification strategy for direct oral DPT can reduce the need for unnecessary skin testing in patients with low-risk penicillin allergy histories. The hub and spoke model of care may be considered for further piloting and validation in other AP populations that lack adequately trained allergists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Allergy (AP Allergy) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). Although the primary aim of the journal is to promote communication between Asia Pacific scientists who are interested in allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology including immunodeficiency, the journal is intended to be available worldwide. To enable scientists and clinicians from emerging societies appreciate the scope and intent of the journal, early issues will contain more educational review material. For better communication and understanding, it will include rational concepts related to the diagnosis and management of asthma and other immunological conditions. Over time, the journal will increase the number of original research papers to become the foremost citation journal for allergy and clinical immunology information of the Asia Pacific in the future.
期刊最新文献
Anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody (CM310) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CROWNS-2): Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) suspected triggered by lipid transfer protein in a Chinese child: A case report. From tumor to tolerance: A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-related adverse events. New-onset autoimmune thyroid disease following COVID-19. Identification of cross-reactive IgE-binding proteins from Philippine allergenic grass pollen extracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1